A conference on the "co-existence" of conventional and biologic farming with Genetically Modified crops ended with little progress in Vienna on Thursday (6 April), with all major stakeholders sticking to their positions.
But EU environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas may have broken new ground when he admitted on 5 April that GMO products "raise a whole new series of possible risks to the environment, notably potential longer-term effects that could impact on biodiversity". "Protected sites or areas, endangered or vulnerable species of plants and animals are of paramount importance in this respect," he said, promising that the Commission would discuss the issue at an orientation debate "next week".
At a news conference, Dimas openly questioned the quality of scientific opinions provided by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA), saying "scientific opinions rendered by EFSA have relied exclusively on information provided by companies that look at short-term effects". "EFSA cannot give a sound scientific opinion on long-term effects of GMOs", he said adding: "There are also questions on whether GMO companies are providing the right information to the European Commission," accoring to Reuters.
Dimas's statement should not necessarily be interpreted as a radical policy shift at the European Commission which has so far insisted on the high scientific quality of the safety assessments performed by EFSA.
Agriculture Commissioner Mariann Fischer Boel insisted that there should be no doubt about the safety of GM products already authorised by the Parma-based agency. "This is not a question of health or environmental protection, because no GMOs are allowed on the EU market unless they have been proved to be completely safe," said Boel.
The EFSA's GMO authorisation procedure has come under fire by some member states who point out that all GM products submitted to its approval have systematically been cleared so far (EurActiv 6 March 2006).
Eight GMO bans are still in place in Austria, France, Germany, Luxembourg and Greece despite EFSA's scientific approval. The Commission repeatedly attempted to lift those bans but was unable to do so because of a loophole in the procedure.
Organisers at the Austrian Presidency made farmers' freedom to choose whether or not to grow GMOs the central theme of the conference. Although national rules have already been put in place to prevent the accidental release of GMOs, some farmers and scientists are still raising concerns about GM crops contaminating neighbouring fields.
Austria, an outspoken critic of GMOs among EU member countries, tries to draw a parallel with consumers "freedom of choice" which is protected under EU law with a labelling obligation for GM food.
"We must now address the second important question, namely how this freedom of choice can be secured for farmers too", said Austria's agriculture minister Josef Pröll.
Pröll emphasised that cross-border "co-existence" of conventional crops with GMOs should also be secured, "given the proximity of fields in neighbouring countries". "We must also find cross-border coexistence solutions", he stressed, emphasising that "national coexistence measures are not always enough".
