EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Danish compromise on GM crops headed for defeat

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 09 March 2012

EU ministers are unlikely to agree draft rules to let countries decide themselves whether to grow or ban genetically modified (GM) crops, despite efforts by Denmark's EU presidency to reach a compromise.

EU environment ministers meeting in Brussels today (9 March) will vote on a Danish compromise designed to break a deadlock that has split governments since the draft rules were proposed in 2010.

The rule change was drafted by the executive European Commission to try to unblock EU decision-making on GM crop approvals, which has seen just two varieties authorised for cultivation in more than 12 years.

But strong opposition from several EU countries has stymied efforts to agree the new rules.

"Things are still looking extremely difficult," Danish Environment Minister Ida Auken, who will lead the discussions, told Reuters.

"We have a small blocking minority at the moment, but we still hope that we will dissolve it, and it's going to come down to one or two countries in the end."

While France, Germany and Belgium are unlikely to reverse their opposition, Britain and Spain had initially appeared willing to support the Danish compromise, EU sources involved in the talks said.

But London and Madrid are now expected to vote against the plan unless certain concessions can be made. Auken would not speculate on what possible changes could win their support.

"I'm going to try to use the argument that, why not give the 22 countries the right to say 'no' when they really want this right?" Auken said. "Why stop somebody else from having that right to say 'no' in their own land?"

The Danish plan would first see companies seeking EU approval to cultivate a GM crop try to agree in advance not to market the product in countries that do not want to grow it, in return for approval to grow the crops in other EU states.

If that proved unsuccessful, countries would then be able to cite certain environmental or other concerns to ban cultivation in all or part of their territories, provided they respect World Trade Organization and EU internal-market rules, the draft compromise showed.

Auken said if no agreement could be reached on Friday, Denmark would consider holding further talks on the plans only if some of the opposing countries showed a willingness to reach a deal.

Environmental campaigners have dismissed the Danish compromise, saying it fails to offer governments sufficient legal grounds to ban GM crops when compared with those proposed by lawmakers in the European Parliament.

EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • Many of the health issues in the US are a direct result of GMO crops (plus the antibiotics and hormones in dairy foods and meats). Dow is now working on their own version of GMO corn that would need a pesticide with components of the agent orange used in Viet Nam. Over 125,000 Indian farmers committed suicide because their crops failed, and they did not have money to purchase new seed or the specific pesticides necessary (Mail Online, 3 Nov, 2008). Dr. Mercola has some excellent, researched and cited articles on the dangers of these crops on the health level.

    By :
    Rette
    - Posted on :
    12/03/2012
  • @Rette, it would perhaps be a good idea to consult other websites than just those of activists and self-proclaimed experts (whose whole business model consists of scaring people and then selling them their own books, products or whatever). Scientific societies from countries all around the world agree that GM crops per se are not more risky than conventional crops, pesticides are used whether there are GM crops or not (and even on organics, only then the pesticides are less refined so they can be classified "organic", but they are nevertheless bioactive substances), and Indian farmers unfortunately killed themselves already before GM cotton arrived in India and they do so in regions where not GM crops are cultivated (the problem there is poverty and lack of access to the formal credit market, not GMOs). Etc., etc., etc.

    By :
    John
    - Posted on :
    26/03/2012
Background: 

EU countries are able to restrict genetically modified crop cultivation under strict conditions as authorisation licences are valid across the 27-country bloc, in accordance with the principles of the EU's single market.

Several member states have repeatedly invoked an EU safeguard clause enabling them to suspend the marketing or growth on their territory of GM crops that enjoy EU-wide authorisation, but the European Commission has never substantiated their applications and has always ordered the lifting of national bans.

In addition, the safety assessments performed by the European Food Safety Authority have come under criticism over the years. The EU executive has tried to introduce practical changes to the EFSA'sGMO-approval process and in spring 2008, it mandated  the agency to revise its guidance for the long-term environmental risk assessment of GM plants.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 2

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising