EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Disgruntled GMO firms start pulling out of EU market

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 25 January 2012, updated 27 January 2012

Monsanto has announced it will scrap plans to sell an insect-resistant maize in France, the second move in a week by biotech company to retreat from the genetically modified foods market in Europe.

Monsanto's announcement on Tuesday (24 January) came a week after Germany's BASF said it would suspend the development of GM crops in Europe and move its plant science arm to the United States.

BASF's move is a particular blow for Europe, said Carel du Marchie Sarvaas, director of agricultural biotechnology at EuropaBio.

"The BASF decision is not good for Europe because I think it is the reaction of a quintessentially European company to what is a stifling political and regulatory environment,” said du Marchie Sarvaas, whose Brussels organisation represents agricultural technology companies.

“Research, jobs, money will go to where it is welcomed. In this case it will be somewhere else. It's a bad day for Europe."

Monsanto said it would not resume sales of MON810, a maize genetically modified to improve pest resistance, despite a French court ruling in November that overturned a 2008 government ban on the sale of MON810.

“Monsanto considers that favourable conditions for the sale of the MON810 in France in 2012 and beyond are not in place,” the St. Louis, Missouri-based company said in a statement.

'Lack of acceptance'

BASF’s decision to move its plant science headquarters from Limburgerhof, Germany, to Raleigh, North Carolina was an acknowledgement that GM plants are unpopular in the European Union.

“We are convinced that plant biotechnology is a key technology for the 21st century,” Stefan Marcinowski, a board member of BASF in charge of plant biotechnology, said in a statement on 16 January. “However, there is still a lack of acceptance for this technology in many parts of Europe – from the majority of consumers, farmers and politicians.

“Therefore, it does not make business sense to continue investing in products exclusively for cultivation in this market.”

While widely accepted on the other side of the Atlantic, GM crops have long been a volatile issue in Europe. Public opinion surveys conducted by Eurobarometer and other polling agencies show a high level if distrust in GM crops in the EU.

Environmental and consumer groups have pressed for restrictions on imports of GM seeds and crops.

Adrian Bebb, food campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe, welcomed the BASF decision last week.

“This is another nail in the coffin for genetically modified foods in Europe,” Bebb said. “No one wants to eat them and few farmers want to grow them. This is a good day for consumers and farmers and opens the door for the European Union to shift Europe to greener and more publicly acceptable farming."

In November, Greens in the European Parliament urged the European Commission to rethink its trade ties with Latin American nations that grow a large part of the protein plants used in animal feed in Europe, arguing that many of the imports are produced through genetically modified crops and are therefore making their way into the food chain.

Still, the opposition is not universal. Last year, MEPs voted overwhelmingly in support of plans to let national governments choose whether to ban the cultivation of GM crops on their territory amid resistance from some countries – including the Czech Republic and Spain – to EU-wide restrictions.

Positions: 

Yara, a Norwegian-based chemicals and agriculture products company, said in a statement that "sustainability has to be the guiding principle for all agricultural activity, and that agricultural R&D should be targeted to improve resource and nutrient efficiency as well as to improve the environmental performance of agriculture. "So far GMO has played an insignificant part of the food security issue in the developing world. It still has to be proven whether GMOs have benefits when it comes to, for instance, water efficiency and nitrogen efficiency. However, we believe that genetic modification of crops is a scientific tool that may prove to be useful in solving future challenges if applied correctly." 

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Anti-science Europe, they must still believe in creationism and engage in Earth worship.

    By :
    Dialla
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • This is a GREAT thing...how on earth is something genetically modified to kill insects going to be any better for a human who ingests it? I love science to death, but genetically modified food is not something that any living being should be consuming.

    By :
    troxycat
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • It is very interesting that real science is being totally ignored. The major changes in organisms caused by the alteration of their genetic makeup is not being tested, nor will it be unless some government insists. ALL changes end up with UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES. U ntil they are tested, no one knows. It could be logical to place at least SOME of the blame for the spike it obesity, diabetes, and other ailments on the back of all the GMO products currently in the USA food supply. And Sweet Corn is supposed to be coming this summer along with FrankenSalmon. Congrats to you in the EU for keeping this genre out of your market.

    By :
    Steve{
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • The situation for science in Europe is getting harder and harder and more and more vulnerable to green extremists!!!
    There is areal danger that our science will be very soon of lower quality compared to that in USA, China etc., since here we are working under constant pressure and even, hate!
    In addition, the problems of European agriculture grow and European citizens are becoming more and more consumers not producers, thus depending on food supply from outside the continent! So, it is a matter of hypocrisy to claim that Europe doesn't want to EAT GM foods, since Europe imports such foods and they are on the European market

    By :
    dimdji
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • The situation for science in Europe is getting harder and harder and more and more vulnerable to green extremists!!!
    There is areal danger that our science will be very soon of lower quality compared to that in USA, China etc., since here we are working under constant pressure and even, hate!
    In addition, the problems of European agriculture grow and European citizens are becoming more and more consumers not producers, thus depending on food supply from outside the continent! So, it is a matter of hypocrisy to claim that Europe doesn't want to EAT GM foods, since Europe imports such foods and they are on the European market

    By :
    dimdji
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • YAY ! One step in the direction ! GM should be banned from all the countries and the directors of monsanto and the other GM companies should be in jail for life for crimes against humanity !

    By :
    Anna E
    - Posted on :
    27/01/2012
  • This is great news! Nobody around here want to buy or eat genetically modified food, good riddance!

    By :
    H.T. Ohlsen
    - Posted on :
    27/01/2012
  • There are several reasons for the"acceptance" of GMO products in the US.
    1. Monsanto has spent around $8-10 million/year to lobby Congress.
    2. GMO products are not labeled as such, so consumers do not have a choice.
    3. Michael R. Taylor who has flip-flopped between US government jobs and Monsanto has now been appointed to the FDA. From 1998-2001, he was VP for Public Policy at Monsanto.
    4. Per Wikileaks: In 2007 it was requested that specific nations inside the European Union be punished for not supporting the expansion of Monsanto’s GMO crops. The request for such measures to be taken was made by Craig Stapleton, the United States ambassador to France and partner to George W. Bush. Despite mounting evidence linking Monsanto’s GM corn to organ damage and environmental devastation, the ambassador plainly calls for ‘target retaliation’ against those not supporting the GM crop. In the leaked documents.
    Scientific info regarding hazards of GMO http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/01/15/dr-don-huber-interview-part-2.aspx

    By :
    Rette
    - Posted on :
    27/01/2012
  • This article is incorrect in its statement that GMOs are widely accepted in the US. with farmers and food manufacturers and government officials they are. Consumers have NO say in this....they are not labeled. Now upwards of 80% of corn and soy here are GMO and we basically have to like it or leave it. Our government only listens to this one company and never listens to us when we call for labeling. I make sure I never touch corn or soy in any form. The only way to protect ourselves from eating GMO is to eat organic, and even then they say the corn and soy have likely been contaminated. We are fighting for labels now...with complete silence from government officials. If justice is on our side, we will get them.

    By :
    Mary
    - Posted on :
    27/01/2012
  • "While widely accepted on the other side of the Atlantic, GM crops have long been a volatile issue in Europe. Public opinion surveys conducted by Eurobarometer and other polling agencies show a high level if distrust in GM crops in the EU."

    As someone who lives "on the other side of the Atlantic" I wouldn't say that GM crops are widely accepted in the US as much as they are forced upon us through lack of transparency and collusion between industry and our government. There is a huge movement underway here in the U.S. to label, and ultimately remove, GM foods from our food supply.

    Keep up the good fight, EU!! The rest of the world is looking to you in this matter!

    By :
    Jenn
    - Posted on :
    27/01/2012
  • As an United States citizen i am great concerned that i am going to go hungry since i eat ORGANICALLY! Its about time Monsanto's gets a taste of their OWN medicine... Stop toying with our food supply... Other countrys really hate us and we don't want to be with out food! For real good for Europe for telling that horrible company to shove their GMO's where the sun doesn't shine! If our country wasn't run by greed and corruption perhaps we as consumers would have a choice about what was going into our food supply! I personally think that these companies harrass farmers to use their crops! People will realize the damage these companies have done when it is too late! Look at the climate changes and the "Super Weeds".... Round-up ready herbicides fail!

    By :
    Brandi Robinson
    - Posted on :
    27/01/2012
  • Well in the United States we now have no choice but to eat GMO's.... It is horrible that our goverment has such deep pockets! When will it end? When we all become flesh eating zombies?

    By :
    Brandi Robinson
    - Posted on :
    27/01/2012
  • very good for Europe! maybe that is where we should all move, so it is safe to eat again

    By :
    Connie
    - Posted on :
    28/01/2012
  • The article states "widely acceptable on the other side of the Atlantic" This is a myth. The fact of the matter is many americans don't know what they're eating, since there are no labels on their food when purchased and if you ask most Americans about GMO, they say "what's that?". As soon as people are educated about what's on their plate, there will be a ban in America as well.

    By :
    Lori
    - Posted on :
    28/01/2012
  • Drug companies need to be charged for WAR CRIMES against the American people as they are using weapons of mass destruction. Biological Warfare (vaccines/GMO foods) and chemical warfare using Mustard Gas (chemo) and nuclear weapons (radiation)and toxic potions/sorcery (drugs). They must be made accountable and charged for mass murder of America People. They are responsible for more deaths than all of the American wars combined annually! When Ron Paul is President, we the people, will demand that every Congressman who has voted to protect drug companies will be charged as well, and fined double what the drug companies gave them. They will be charged with treason for NOT uphold our constitution through the Patriot Act and NDAA as well. Vote Ron Paul!

    By :
    EllenDiann
    - Posted on :
    29/01/2012
  • France grows much more grain normally than its people can use. They do not need to poison their lands with Roundup.

    Ellen: Ron Paul is for the American people! but doubt that he will be go that far.

    By :
    gram evans
    - Posted on :
    30/01/2012
  • No economic growth just for the sake of economic growth - isn't that what got us in this financial/environmental crisis to begin with? Good work, Europe.

    By :
    Naomi
    - Posted on :
    31/01/2012
  • Im from Canada and yes i would say they ahave been forced on us all :/

    By :
    Nikki
    - Posted on :
    03/02/2012
  • America and Canada are the least free and least democratic countries in the world, run by evil facist government institutions and corporations. America is a corporate facism and the government's idol and model is communist china

    By :
    Mark
    - Posted on :
    15/02/2012
  • How do we feed the poorest if not with GMO?

    By :
    Sam Lowry
    - Posted on :
    22/02/2012
  • XXX

    By :
    Test
    - Posted on :
    22/02/2012
Background: 

In July 2010, the European Commission adopted proposals overhauling the EU's policy on GM crop cultivation, hoping to draw a line under years of controversy regarding GMO approvals.

Under the proposal, EU member states would be able to ban GM crop cultivation on their territory.

The 2010 package included non-binding guidelines on co-existence between GM and non-GM crops, which replaced the 2003 Commission guidance on national co-existence measures.

According to the EU executive, the new guidelines on co-existence enable member states to adopt measures to avoid the unintended presence of GM plants in conventional and organic crops below the labelling threshold of 0.9%.

In July 2011 the European Parliament voted overwhelmingly in support of plans to let member states choose whether to ban the cultivation of GM crops on their territory.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising