EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Mercosur trade deal to cost EU farmers billions: Study

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 29 April 2011, updated 03 May 2011

European farmers could lose more than €3 billion in annual revenue by 2020 under any free trade deal between the European Union and Latin America's Mercosur region, a study for the EU executive showed.

The deepest loses would be felt by beef producers in Ireland, Britain and France, hit by a predicted 200,000-tonne annual increase in beef imports from Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, the study for the European Commission showed.

Last year, the European Union and Mercosur relaunched talks stalled since 2004 with the aim of creating the world's biggest free-trade zone, with 750 million people and trade in goods and services worth €84 billion in 2010. Negotiators remain hopeful of reaching an agreement later this year. Any deal is likely to see Europe open its markets to South American agricultural imports in return for greater access to Mercosur's markets for services and goods, such as cars.

But the talks face strong opposition from EU governments such as France and Ireland, where influential farming groups have warned that an increase in cheaper food imports could put many EU producers out of business.

Job losses

The study was produced for the Commission's agriculture department by the EU's scientific research centre, the JRC, and was presented to EU government trade officials in Brussels on Thursday. It remains private but Reuters has seen a copy.

It showed that up to 33,000 farm jobs could be lost in Europe if the draft EU-Mercosur deal was approved.

"The overall impact of a possible EU-Mercosur free trade agreement on the EU agricultural sector is negative, but the intensity of the effects considerably varies across agricultural products [and] regions," the study's authors said.

By 2020, EU beef production would fall by over 150,000 tonnes a year, with producer prices for the meat falling by nearly 8%, the study said.

Ireland would see its annual farm revenues fall by more than 4% in 2020, due to the high share of beef production in overall farm output, while farm income in Britain and France would fall by 3% and 2% respectively, the study showed.

EU cereals exports to the four Mercosur countries would increase by about one million tonnes a year by 2020, while the deal would have little impact on EU sugar production or prices, the authors said.

The Commission's trade department has said an EU-Mercosur trade deal would deliver net economic benefits worth about €4.5 billion a year to both regions.

(EurActiv with Reuters.)

Positions: 

EU farmers' lobby Copa-Cogeca has repeatedly warned against further liberalising agriculture trade with Mercosur. The Latin American Trade Bloc "has already seen phenomenal growth in its agricultural exports, with its trade surplus increasing fivefold since 2000, and the EU is its main market. Further trade liberalisation will increase our dependence on Mercosur for food at the expense of EU farmers and will cause severe environmental damage and deforestation," it said.

Copa-Cogeca stresses that Mercosur and the EU are not comparable as the first is not a customs union or an internal market like the EU, but an economic and political agreement between its members. This means, for example, that products exported to Mercosur need to be sold to each country separately, whereas Mercosur imports to the EU can freely move inside the 27 member states.

The Latin American bloc does not follow the same high level production standards as the EU farmers either, uses pesticides forbidden in Europe and growth hormones in animal feed, and its animal wellfare requirements are modest compared to those in force in the EU, the group said.

Mercosur countries' agricultural sector is already very competitive, while additional market access to the EU market would have a catastrophic impact on the EU agricultural sector and the economy and employment in rural areas, it added.

"A study carried out by the Joint Research Centre on behalf of the [European] Commission reveals that beef production in Brazil results in twice the quantity of green house gas emissions produced by EU beef production and four times as much if account is taken of the destruction of forests which has taken place to make way for beef production," said Pekka Personen, Copa-Cogeca's secretary-general. 

"Existing imports of beef from Brazil alone represents 3% of all EU agricultural emissions. Any increase in beef imports would make it that much more difficult to achieve the EU’s reduction objectives or global reductions," Pesonen added.

Joris Baecke, president of the European Council of Young Farmers (CEJA), said that "the EU's high agricultural quality and production standards, as well as other important non-trade concerns such as a potential greening of the CAP, should be kept in mind in the Mercosur negotiations".

"Europe's young farmers already face a real financial challenge when starting up and modernising their farms, and new policies from the CAP reform could mean that Europe's farmers will be asked to do even more in the coming years. Therefore, trade deals that could affect important agri-sectors and the competitive potential of young farmers' agri-businesses should be treated with a more than careful approach from the EU," Baecke added. 

Next steps: 
  • 2 May 2011: EU farmers' lobby Copa-Cogeca to host seminar on agricultural impact of EU-Mercosur trade negotiations. Impact of potential agreement on EU meat, sugar, fruit juice and maize sectors to be presented at seminar.
  • 2-6 May 2011: Second-to-last round of negotiations in Asunción (offers might be exchanged).
  • 4-8 July 2011: Last round of negotiations in Brussels.
Background: 

Mercosur was established in 1991 and counts Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay among its members. It is not a customs union or an internal market like the EU, but an economic and political agreement between its members. In area size, Brazil alone counts for nearly double the EU-27 area.

The first EU-Mercosur free trade talks were launched in 1999, but they stalled in 2004 because the EU did not get what it wanted on the industrial goods and services market.

To the great despair of European farmers, the talks were relaunched in May 2010 under the Spanish EU Presidency. 

Last year, the European Union and Mercosur relaunched talks stalled since 2004 with the aim of creating the world's biggest free-trade zone, with 750 million people and trade in goods and services worth €84 billion euro in 2010. Negotiators remain hopeful of reaching an agreement later this year. Any deal is likely to see Europe open its markets to South American agricultural imports in return for greater access to Mercosur's markets for services and goods such as cars.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 2

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising