EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Mixed reactions to proposed EU farm sector reform

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 21 May 2008, updated 28 May 2012

Fewer production-linked payments, more monies for rural development and a scrapping of a requirement to keep a certain percentage of land out of production are part of the Commission's plans to make the EU's agricultural regime more responsive to market forces.

The proposed reforms are "all about freeing our farmers to meet growing demand and respond quickly to what the market is telling them," EU Agriculture and Rural Development Commissioner Mariann Fischer Boel said in a 20 May press statement announcing the plans.

Dubbed the 'Health Check', the proposals build on an earlier Commission communication published on 20 November 2007 and are part of an ongoing process to modernise and simplify the EU's agricultural regime, which has been heavily criticised for creating harmful distortions in European and global agricultural markets.

A further decoupling of production from payments is introduced as a main feature of the proposals, although suckler cow, goat and sheep premia will continue to benefit from exemptions. In parallel, 8% of current direct aid to farmers should be 'modulated', or shifted, towards the EU's rural development budget by 2012. 

"Funding obtained this way could be used by member states to reinforce programmes in the fields of climate change, renewable energy, water management and biodiversity," according to the Commission. 

Meanwhile 'cross compliance' obligations, under which farmers who do not adhere to environmental guidelines risk reductions to subsidies, should be simplified, the EU executive said. 

Existing intervention mechanisms, whereby public funds are used to buy up any surplus production, should also be eliminated or reduced for a number of products, notably durum wheat, rice and pig meat, according to the proposal.  

In addition, existing requirements to keep 10% of arable land out of production - the so-called 'set-aside' - should be abolished. Likewise milk quotas are to be phased out by 2015, following several years of continued quota increases in order to ensure milk producers a 'soft landing'. 

The reform plans, to be discussed by the EU's agriculture ministers (who hope to reach a deal before the end of the year), are being put forward in a context of surging global food prices (EurActiv 20/05/08). 

Positions: 

The UK gave a mixed reaction to the proposals. "Good progress has been made in reforming the CAP in recent years, but much more is needed to boost farm competitiveness, protect the environment, improve value for money and address concerns about food prices," the government said in a press statement.

More emphasis on environmental protection is needed, bureaucracy and market controls must be reduced, and all price support measures should be phased out, according to the statement.

"We will now study the Commission's proposals carefully and negotiate for the Health Check to advance these aims," it said. 

For the French government, which is opposed to full decoupling of payments, the plans are not in "frontal opposition" to France's position, in particular since key budget guarantees are in place. Nonetheless, the French EU Presidency, which will take up the dossier in the second half of 2008, may need to take a closer look at the file in the event that global agricultural prices remain high, EurActiv France reported

French President Nicolas Sarkozy also spoke out in favour of CAP reform in September 2007 (EurActiv 12/09/07). But the French Agriculture Minister Michel Barnier sent shockwaves through Brussels recently when he spoke out strongly in favour of the current subsidy regime, suggesting that the CAP should serve as an example for developing states in their effort to address rising food prices (EurActiv 29/04/08).

The Liberal Democrats (ALDE Group) in the Parliament welcomed the plans and pledged their support. "We shall strive to translate the Commission's vision into a modern, effective and sustainable agricultural policy for the years ahead," MEP Graham Watson, the group's leader, said in a statement.

The Greens/EFA Group, on the other hand, slammed the Health Check as "weak", labelling it "the wrong therapy". 

"The scandalous imbalance in public support at the disadvantage of the vast majority of European farmers persists" and the dossier should be treated under the codecision procedure in order to give Parliament a greater say, the Greens said in a statement. Currently, Parliament only has a consultative role, with the Commission and member states having the final say.

But the Commission is wary of such a shift in the proposal's legal basis. This would significantly delay adoption of the reforms, in particular since the EU's legislative process will be slowed in 2009 because of the arrival of a new Commission and Parliament, says Michael Mann, spokesperson for the Commission's Agriculture and Rural Development Directorate.

The UK National Farmers Union (NFU) lamented that the Health Check "does not go far enough" in terms of removing market distortions within the EU resulting from differing subsidy regimes between member states and regions. 

Next steps: 
  • By end 2008: Deal on CAP Health Check expected before the end of the year.
Background: 

The last major effort to reform and simplify the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) was launched in 2003 (EurActiv LinksDossier).

The reforms featured a 'decoupling' of agricultural production from subsidy payments in order to prevent over-production and waste through a Single Payment Scheme (SPS), in which subsidies are allocated according to indicators such as land size rather than production volume. Cross-compliance measures, whereby farmers are required to meet certain environmental, food safety and animal welfare standards, were also introduced as a pre-condition for receiving payments under the SPS.

In addition to cuts in intervention prices for several sectors, the reforms also featured a shift or so-called 'modulation' in monies from the first "pillar" of the CAP (direct aids and market support) to its "second pillar", rural development. This measure was presented as an instrument to "green" the CAP, which accounts for over 40% of the EU budget.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising