EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Liberal, socialist leaders join spat over Romania protests

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 02 February 2012

The European Parliament's Liberal and socialist leaders, Guy Verhofstadt and Hannes Swoboda, gave their support to the Romanian opposition during a public hearing over the democratic situation there, as protests continue in Bucharest over government austerity measures.

The hearing - called The Romanian Democracy - Political abuse and citizens' reactions - was opened on 31 January with strong-worded statements by Verhofstadt and Swoboda, the new leader of the Socialists and Democrats group in the European Parliament.

The hearing took place after weeks of protests in Romania over an unpopular healthcare reform bill and focused on the state of democracy in Romania under the current government.

“The fact that Verhofstadt showed up and supported them shows that this is something that deserves special attention, the European political groups need the support of the ruling party in Romania,” said a Romanian source in Parliament who asked not to be named.

In Romania, the Social-Democrats and Liberals, together with the Conservatives, form a strong opposition to the current ruling party, the centre-right Democratic Liberal party (PDL) (see background).

“I am worried that there is an increased tendency in Europe towards populism and radicalism, a re-nationalisation of Europe,” Verhofstadt said. “The message everywhere is the same: it cannot continue like that. I think there is a problem. Protests reflect that.”

Corruption

The liberal leader gave a series of examples of international groups, such as Transparency International, which revealed that the corruption situation in Romania had worsened under President Traian Basescu's PDL.

Swoboda said the latest developments in Romania were “a dangerous deviation from the principle of democracy”.

He gave an explanation for what pushed Romanians to take to the streets in the past month: "Bypassing parliament and issuing government decrees instead of democratic laws cannot be tolerated. If people realise that the parliament is not heard, they will rightly go onto the streets.”

When it comes to voting in the European Parliament, Romanian liberals are the most to the Parliament's Liberal group and the country's social democrats are the third most loyal to the Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group, according to statistics provided by the VoteWatch group, which monitors legislative votes.

This year, Bucharest will be a point of attraction for political groups in the European Parliament, with the centre-right European People's Party (EPP) holding its annual congress there. The European Socialists will also hold their biggest political event there at the end of September.

As a relatively large country, Romania has 33 MEPs in Parliament, compared to 18 representing Bulgaria. “In Central and Eastern Europe, Romania and Poland are generally considered the most influential countries and at the moment, the European political families have a stake in Romania,” a Romanian source told EurActiv.

Location of public hearing boosts audience impact

Opinion polls show that Romanians trust EU institutions more than their domestic political system.

“Romanians think the EU is more honest than the national politicians and usually good things came from the EU in Romania, such as the reform of the judiciary, brought about with the help of the Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification,” the Romanian source said. “The EU is perceived as a guardian of good manners and directions in Romania”.

The European Parliament's public hearing was broadcast on Romania's Antena 3 television which currently leads in terms of audience and has been most active in covering last month’s protests. The station is broadly seen as supporting the opposition.

“For the ordinary Romanian, who does not know what are the responsibilities of the European Parliament exactly, the fact that democracy in their country was discussed in the EP will mean that the situation is getting serious – the social democrats and the liberals played on this, making the EP say it for them,” the source close to the political discussions said.

He also added that the intention of the opposition parties in Romania was to affect the country’s image - for which he said Basescu holds responsibility.

Intention of hearing was 'not to complain'

“I did not come here with the opposition parties to complain or criticise Romania. I came with three targets: to inform you about facts that we consider a break of European standards of democracy,” said Victor Ponta, who heads Romania's Social Democrats.

Liberal leader Crin Antonescu likened Romania's current regime to a “dictatorship” similar to Syria, adding that the US ambassador to Romania said that “at least people are not being shot in the streets”. The liberal leader also accused Basescu of adopting Mussolini-like rhetoric.

Conservative leader Constantin Daniel criticised Prime Minister Emil Boc for Romania’s low capacity to absorb EU regional funding - currently the lowest in the EU, at 3.5%.

Romanian MEP Traian Ungureanu (EPP) criticised European Parliament President Martin Schulz, saying he exceeded his powers by getting involved in Romanian national politics and went over the top by welcoming Ponta and Antonescu in the Assembly on 31 January.

“In his capacity as president of the European Parliament, he has no moral right to rule in matters of domestic policy and I wonder if it's a gesture worthy of an EP President," the Mediafax news agency quoted Unugreanu as saying

Ungureanu called Swoboda an “accomplice” for ”reinforcing the idea that Romania is a country under dictatorship”, Mediafax reported.

MEPs who are members of the ruling PDL in Romania are expected to send an official complaint to the EP over Schulz’s action, the Mediafax report said.

Positions: 

Sulfina Barbu, Romanian labour minister, also present at the hearing, said: “We need to be in dialogue with the opposition to be able to come up with solutions for their worries because the EU needs member states that are strong and that are bold enough to respect budgetary discipline and to curb populist discourse and movements.”

Cristian Preda, MEP, member of the EPP group in the European Parliament, about Romanian future governance: “We need an intelligent coalition not a huge force”.

Monica MacoveiRomanian MEP, member of the EPP group and former minister of Justice in Romania: “The opposition did not leave room open for debate, did not use the democratic instruments they were talking about. The protests in Romania were for the reform of the political class, she added, “and the parties present here did not mention how they are going to reform it”.

Macovei also raised questions related to “the credibility of those who came to the meeting”. Most of the civil society representatives that the social-democrats and liberals invited to the public hearing in the European Parliament were people who appear constantly on television channel Antena 3, which is widely seen as supporting the opposition.

Liberal leader Crin Antonescu accused the Romanian government of not being "modern" enough and of being "irresponsible". “There should not be a debate on whether there is dictatorship in Romania or not, in the first place, we should not have to do this”.

Social-democrat leader Victor Ponta said they were in the European Parliament “to defend the people who took to the streets in 61 cities in Romania”. He said the demonstrators were not only protesting against economic austerity, but also against the government.

Next steps: 
  • 2012: local, parliamentary elections
  • 28-29 Sept. 2012: PES (Party of European Socialists) congress in Bucharest, Romania
  • Fall 2012: EPP congress in Bucharest, Romania
  • 2014: Romanian presidential elections
Ana-Maria Tolbaru

COMMENTS

  • The Romanian opposition are demagogues. Victor Ponta says "the demonstrators were not only protesting against economic austerity, but also against the government." He forgets to mention one of the main banners at the recent protests: "USL = PDL = the same garbage". The USL is the opposition coalition, whereas the PDL is the governing party. Some socialist Mr. Ponta is too ... if these protests hadn't started, he would have been racing at the Monte Carlo rally! As things stand, he needed to cancel, and so lost his 40,000 euro deposit!

    By :
    Andrei Panait
    - Posted on :
    02/02/2012
Background: 

Leftist Social Democrats and rightist Liberals and Conservatives are divided in ideology but united against the current government of Prime Minister Emil Boc and the president, Traian Basescu. They have decided to join their forces with a view to oust the center-right government in the next general election set for 2012.

The three parties on 5 February 2011 signed a protocol forming an alliance called the Social Liberal Union, USL.

USL are to present one candidate for all parties at local elections to be held in the spring of 2012 and they are also hopeful of forming the next government.

The first goal of the coalition is to spark early parliamentary elections. Both liberal leader Crin Antonescu and the social-democratic leader Victor Ponta have said they would like to see Basescu step down. The election for president is only due in 2014.

Basescu’s support started shrinking in January 2012, after an event that was called by international media the first in “Romania’s winter of discontent”. Deputy Health Minister Raed Arafat resigned on 10 January following his opposition to the health care provisions suggested by Romanian authorities that would privatise half the emergency healthcare system. He was later reinstated.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Central Europe News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Central Europe Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising