EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Parliament divided over Hungary’s democratic record

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 03 July 2013

Members of the European Parliament failed to unite behind a report calling on Budapest to remove a constitutional amendment that critics say restricts democracy and basic rights in Hungary. EurActiv reports from Strasbourg.

 

MEPs held a heated debate on Tuesday (2 July) in Strasbourg ahead of a vote on Wednesday over Hungary's democratic standards.

The conservative government of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has faced criticism over changes to the country's constitution, including changes to the fourth amendment, which grants broad new powers to the government (see background).

Orbán, who participated in the Strasbourg debate, has sharply attacked MEPs, saying that Europe used double standards and that successful countries were being punished instead of praised.

“We don’t want a Europe where the unity expressed by the two-thirds majority is condemned instead of respected,” he said.

Orbán’s ruling centre-right Fidesz party has used its unprecedented two-thirds parliamentary majority to make laws that critics say limit citizens' freedoms.

These include tough laws on education, homelessness and election funding. MEPs will adopt or reject today a report, written by Portuguese Green MEP Rui Tavares, which calls Orban’s government to scrap those provisions that the Constitutional Court have already declared unconstitutional.

If Hungary fails to comply, MEPs say the Council of Ministers should use Article 7 of the EU Treaty that enables a formal investigation as to whether the EU's fundamental rights have been breached.

Orban criticised the “very insulting report” and said it violated the Treaty as the report also calls for placing Hungary “under guardship”.

Defending the report, Tavares said Europe is a diverse place. "We don’t only respect this diversity, but we cherish it,” said Tavares.

“But what is important is whether these are compatible with our values or not. Europe is not only a club of democracies, we are also a union of democracy.”

MEPs were split left-right on the report, with the liberals (ALDE) saying it did not go far enough.

ALDE President Guy Verhofstadt noted that the Venice Commission, an advisory board of the Council of Europe, confirmed that the fourth amendment of the Hungarian Constitution contradicts EU fundamental laws and standards.

“In the European Parliament we ought to stand firm in protecting the basic principles of the European Union. How much more evidence do we need before recognising that in Hungary there is a risk of serious breach of European fundamental values,” Verhofstadt thundered.

"We should learn from our mistakes of the past. If today we turn a blind eye to a violation of EU fundamental rights in the EU Member States we will find ourselves faced with a political crisis with dire consequences in a long run."

Socialist group leader Hannes Swoboda insisted the report was not an attack on Hungary.

"If we vote for this report, we're voting for the freedom of the people in Hungary," said the Austrian MEP.

He said no other country in Europe had made so many constitutional changes as Hungary under the Orbán government, which came to power in 2010.

Positions: 

Sophie in’t Veld (D66, Netherlands) said: "Fundamental rights don't belong to any nationality, nor do they have a political colour. We should have the courage to tell each other when things are wrong, this is real friendship and a way to develop a real culture of fundamental rights."

EurActiv.com from Strasbourg

COMMENTS

  • Rui Tavares and Barroso should go back to Portugal and Spain and fix the mess in his own country.
    There is very could learn from Hungary.
    Hungary should be praised, not condemned.

    By :
    Ladislao Koe
    - Posted on :
    03/07/2013
  • What should Obama think about an divided U.S.Senate due to a democratic-lack of a state ...

    By :
    un european
    - Posted on :
    03/07/2013
  • BRIEF GLIMPSE OF TODAY'S HUNGARY THROUGH SMOKE RINGS, JULY 3 2013

    Ring 1: 2012: Fidesz Government (i.e., Mr. Viktor Orban, P.M.) decides to use parliamentary supermajority power (yet again), this time to reduce the number of tobacco concession licenses countrywide from 40,000 to about 5,500.

    Ring 2: Ostensible pretext: To reduce smoking

    Ring 3: Owners of about 40,000 tobacco shops ("Trafiks") countrywide, some of them decades-old family businesses, are informed that all of them will lose their right to sell tobacco and must apply to a nationwide assessment that will distribute the 5,500 licenses that will remain.

    Ring 4: The assessment takes place, and the recipients almost all turn out to be Fidesz supporters and their families, some families and individuals being awarded multiple concessions (one each to the husband and wife in one family, 9 to the cleaning lady of another family,).

    Ring 5: Almost none of the original 40,000 concessionaires were awarded licenses; almost all those who did win them had no prior experience in the trade: their only common attribute was their Fidesz connection.

    Ring 6: News of the outcome emerges; Fidesz denies bias: licenses were awarded to the best qualified.

    Ring 7: Testimony as well as tapes emerge of the deliberations in selecting the winners, and the explicit criterion is Fidesz fidelity. The public demands to see the data on the deliberations.

    Ring 8: Fidesz uses its supermajority power (yet again), to make the data inaccessible to the public.

    Ring 9: July 1 2013: Fidesz preparing to declare its anti-smoking campaign a great success, and to declare Hungary again a model for the rest of the world, as it is in so many other things: finance, governance, justice, constitutionality, and anti-corruption measures.

    Ring 10: July 3, 2013: EU votes to put Hungary's government under monitoring for breaching fundamental rights: EU vote is bipartisan, supported by both the left and the right.

    By :
    Stevan Harnad
    - Posted on :
    03/07/2013
  • What is at stake here is the next year’s parliamentary elections in Hungary. The Hungarian political left (the ex-Communist Socialists, and other left-wing groups) is in complete disarray and the European left (currently in majority on the EU) is doing everything it can to support it. These public scoldings and threats by the EU are designed to create uncertainty and fear and turn the people of Hungary against the government, which still has a comfortable lead among decided voters. The reports on the EU’s action, like this one, in the Western media, written mostly by people of Hungarian origin and mostly representing the views of the opposition, will be dutifully reported in the opposition media in Hungary as “Western condemnation” of the Hungarian government. This of course will become a useful partisan-political ammunition against the government in the upcoming months, leading up to the elections.

    Orban is right. This kind of politically motivated intervention (the vote on Hungary in the EU parliament clearly followed existing party lines) into member countries’ democratic process can be, end will be the undoing of the EU.

    By :
    Newsreader
    - Posted on :
    03/07/2013
  • „But what is important is whether these are compatible with our values or not. Europe is not only a club of democracies, we are also a union of democracy.”
    Which „European” values? The value of joblessness? Or the values of your cherished French revolution? The values of killing people due to their origin? Or the values of slavery? Or the values of colonising entire continents? Which „European” values? The „values” of poultry welfare? The „values” of animal welfare? What about the welfare of humans?
    Which „democracy”? That people „vote” on austerity or more austerity? Which „democracy”? That terrorists from the European Central Bank, from the European Commission and from the International Monetary Fund walk around Europe telling people that they should die because they’re not competitive enough? Which „democracy”? That people should leave their homeland because of your „democratic values”?

    „MEPs were split left-right on the report, with the liberals (ALDE) saying it did not go far enough.”
    These guys are not liberals, neither are they pseudo-liberals, they are terrorists.

    „Socialist group leader Hannes Swoboda insisted the report was not an attack on Hungary.” The guy is right. It was an attack on human values. Sous la guillotine avec vous!!

    By :
    Progressive Masculinist Party
    - Posted on :
    04/07/2013
  • I don't understand the title: the Parliament was not divided as 370 voted in favour, which is way more than the total seats held by S&D, ALDE and the Greens, while the votes against were far fewer than the total number of seats held by EPP, the conservatives and the eurosceptics. I await the legislative steps that must follow the report, as an EP own initiative report has no bearing in itself. The status of democratic institutions should be audited in every member state and the principle declared that if there is any constitutional change it can only bring "more democracy" not less.

    By :
    Akos Ersek
    - Posted on :
    04/07/2013
  • Tavares report on Hungary is a smoke screen for Barosso and company.If Hungary has no right to change,amend its constitution by the majority of its parliament.What about article 7 of the EU Treaty that enables a formal investigation as to whether the EU's fundamental rights have been breached in Greece?Human Rights are non-existent in Greece.The indigenous Macedonian,and Turkish minorities have not been recognized as separate ethnicity,their rights have been denied.These two peoples can't even declare their identity.Macedonians are being denied their basic rights as to be able to worship,speak and learn their mother tongue.Mr.Tavares finds time to critisize Hungarys democracy that two thirds of their parliament voted to amended the constitution,that is democracy Mr.Tavares.Why not go after Greece that is not respecting Human Rights of every individual that feels different than the Greeks.Why not tackle the ICJ findings,the McDougall (UN)report on Greece.How long will EU pimp for Greece?.

    By :
    Peter
    - Posted on :
    05/07/2013
Hungarian MEP Krisztina Morvai holds a banner in the European Parliament's plenary session, Strasbourg, 2 July 2013 (Photo: European Parliament)
Background: 

Following general election held in April 2010, Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said that voters had carried out a "revolution" by giving his party Fidesz two-thirds of the seats in parliament to rebuild Hungary after a near financial collapse.

Fidesz is affiliated with the centre-right European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament.

A new Hungarian constitution was adopted in April 2011 without much debate. It was severely criticised by civil liberties groups and the Socialist and Liberal European political families, for being contrary to EU norms and values and for strengthening the Fidesz one-party rule.

However, the EU commissioner responsible for institutional relations, Maroš Šefčovič, said in July 2011 that the new Hungarian constitution does not raise issues of compatibility with European Union law. 

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Central Europe News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Central Europe Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising