EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU leaders fail to hammer out climate funding details

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 30 October 2009, updated 14 December 2012

EU leaders have agreed on the need to provide €100 billion a year to fund climate efforts in developing countries, but failed to commit the EU to any specific sums, delaying their decision until after December's UN conference in Copenhagen.

Between €22-€50 billion a year would have to come from international public financing, but how much the EU would fork out will depend on "comparable commitments" from other countries, EU leaders said at the conclusion of a two-day summit on 30 October.

An agreement on the EU's 'fair share' of the lump sum stalled on disagreements about how the financial burden will be shared within the EU. The heads of state and government agreed to set up a working group "to take account of each country's financing capabilities," French President Nicolas Sarkozy said after the summit.

Moreover, the leaders agreed that €5-€7 billion per year will have to be made available as fast-track funding between 2010 and 2012 before the entry into force of the new climate treaty. But the EU's share will only be determined after Copenhagen, the conclusions state.

Here, the Swedish Presidency, backed by the UK, Denmark and others, had to bow to the demands of a group of nine Eastern European member states led by Poland and Hungary, who were worried that they would end up paying more than they could afford and wanted to make any contributions to upfront funds voluntary.

The Swedish Presidency submitted new proposals this morning after reaching an agreement proved impossible on Thursday (29 October). The less prosperous member states refused to sign up to any agreement that would oblige them to pay more than their wealthier neigbours (EurActiv 30/10/09).

Ambitious long-term emission cut target

The leaders endorsed the long-term target of reducing the collective developed country emissions by 80-95% below 1990 levels by 2050 as agreed by environment ministers last week.

EU leaders talked up the agreement as a huge breakthrough in negotiations that have been dragging on for months.

"The EU has a very strong position, now that the countdown to Copenhagen has started. It's a decision that enables the EU to continue taking lead in the negotiations, a position that encourages others to deliver," said Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt.

European Commission President José Manuel Barroso argued that the EU had kept its leadership role. "Regarding climate change, this was an important breakthrough, which brings new momentum," he said.

But the leaders stressed that the agreement was entirely conditional on action by other developed countries. The EU is now looking to see what the US, Australia, Japan and Canada will bring to the table.

"That does not mean being naïve – our offer is not a blank cheque: we are ready to act if our partners deliver. If we want developing countries to come to the table with serious commitments, then we need developed countries to put money on the table for adaptation to climate change and to help finance developing countries' mitigation efforts," Barroso stated. "We need to put our money where our mouth is."

No decision on 'hot air'

However, the summit did not move on the issue of surplus emission allowances left over from the Kyoto Protocol. The conclusions simply state that unused Assigned Amount Units (AAUs), as the pollution permits are called, are likely to accrue and must be addressed "in a non-discriminatory manner, treating European and non-European countries equally".

The bulk of unused credits in Europe are in the hands of Eastern member states, which made clear statements during the summit that they would not part with their allowances. Germany, on the other hand, has been leading calls for all unused credits to be cancelled after Kyoto.

The Swedish Presidency is now likely to call an additional meeting of EU environment ministers to find common ground on how to handle the surplus credits.

Looking outside of Europe

Amid bickering among EU member states about internal burden sharing, some EU countries are now starting to look for alliances outside of Europe to ensure an ambitious outcome at the Copenhagen climate conference in December.

Sarkozy said that he and German Chancellor Angela Merkel were working together with Brazil to put forward a proposal for Copenhagen.

"We think it is very important that Europe mobilises the whole of poor countries and notably Africa on the same position as us," Sarkozy said. He envisioned a common axis between Europe, the emerging economies of Brazil and Mexico and developing countries to counter China, the US and India.

Positions: 

The Greens criticised EU leaders for passing up a chance to revitilise the UN climate talks.

"The EU's preoccupation with finding a weighting mechanism to ease the burden on its economically weaker member states is apparently not matched by a genuine commitment to achieve a fair agreement on a global scale. Fair solutions must be found for the likes of China, India and Brazil, not only for Poland," said Rebecca Harms, president of the Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament. "At this summit, EU leaders have regrettably focused more on cooling expectations for Copenhagen than on tackling the warming of the planet," she added. 

NGOs were disappointed with the conclusions on climate funding.

Oxfam expressed concerns that there are no guarantees that the money will be new and not diverted from existing aid commitments. It said that the top-end of the range, €50 billion per year, does not cover even half of what developing countries really need to combat climate change. 

"Right now, the EU is treating a climate change deal like a novice on E-Bay. It has made an opening bid for climate justice that is nowhere near enough and with a fatal flaw. It's no sale, Europe, and you only have a short time left to bid again before the auction closes on a safe and fair deal in Copenhagen," said Elise Ford, head of Oxfam International's Brussels office.

WWF  regretted that the summit went with vague wording on the essential issues blocking the international negotiations. 

"It is especially frustrating that no clear European financial offer to developing countries has been agreed, and that the increase in CO2 emission reduction targets is made conditional upon comparable efforts by other developed countries," said Jason Anderson, head of EU climate and energy policy at WWF.

Greenpeace said all is not lost as 27 of the world's richest nations had backed global climate funding for developing countries. 

"The Copenhagen train is still running, but the world desperately needs some climate leadership to stop the wheels from jumping off the track. Regardless of whether climate legislation is passed in the US ahead of Copenhagen, President Obama should step up and break the deadlock in negotiations," said Joris den BlankenGreenpeace EU's climate policy director.

Friends of the Earth Europe said that the prospect of reaching a just climate agreement was no closer after the EU summit. 

"Europe has failed once again to say how much it is prepared to contribute for climate finance. Heads of state only cited global figures which are completely inadequate, as are the targets they have set for cutting emissions. In every way the EU is shirking its historical responsibilities and blocking progress towards the just and fair agreement the world needs in Copenhagen," said Sonja Meister, climate campaign coordinator for Friends of the Earth Europe.

The European Climate Foundation  pointed out that the EU had now laid out global requirements on financing, both long-term and fast-track. "Our analysis shows that carbon markets are unlikely to be able to contribute more than 5-10% of the required funding in the 2010-2020 period, and therefore hard commitments on direct funding from all developed countries will be required if the parties to the Copenhagen summit are to achieve the goal of limiting global warming to the EU target  of 2°C," said Jules Kortenhorst, CEO of the European Climate Foundation

Background: 

The global community is currently engaged in negotiations to agree a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. But the talks have stalled as developed countries have not put forward concrete offers for financial aid to help poor nations with their efforts to cut emissions and adapt to the consequences of climate change. 

In an attempt to break the deadlock, the European Commission presented on 10 September a blueprint for international climate funding (EurActiv 11/09/09). It suggested that the EU's share of climate mitigation and adaptation aid for developing countries could be in the range of 2-15 billion euros a year.

But so far the EU has been unable to decide a common position, as its poorer member states are concerned that they will end up paying more than they can afford. A finance ministers' meeting on 20 October failed to produce conclusions on disagreements about fast-track financing between 2010 and 2013, as a coalition led by Poland argued that all such contributions should be voluntary (EurActiv 21/10/09).

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising