EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Big banks still prefer dirty energy investments, research shows

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 01 December 2011

Major multilateral development banks have invested 64% more money in fossil fuel projects than in clean energy technologies over the last four years, according to research published on a new database.

Shift the Subsidies’, an interactive database financed by Oil Change International, says it has collated all known institutional loans, grants, and financial guarantees to the energy sector since 2008.

It has found that that while over $40 billion has been made available to fossil fuel energy development, clean energy projects received $25.5 billion.    

The news will hit EU hopes at the Durban Climate Summit that development banks and carbon markets will provide the majority of the $100 billion a year needed to finance and implement the Green Climate Fund agreed a year ago.

Jonathan Pershing, the American deputy special envoy on climate change, said on 28 November at the South African summit that Washington’s contributions to the climate fund agreed at the Copenhagen Summit in 2009 included financing from multilateral banks.

“If the U.S. is going to claim credit for fast-start finance commitments for clean energy projects, it's only fair that they be docked for their fossil fuel finance from the same institutions” said Steve Kretzmann, the director of Oil Change International.

“Unfortunately, as this new database shows, the US and all developed nations continue to support fossil fuels significantly more than clean energy”.

Carbon price crash

Other forms of clean energy investment are also suffering from an uncertainty over the future role of carbon credits, which has already fuelled a record price collapse in the carbon market.

Between 2008 and 2010, new investment in the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), which allows rich nations to offset their carbon emissions by funding emissions-reduction projects in the developing world, fell by 80% to $1.5 billion.

“I fear that will be smaller again” this year, said Ben Caldecott, head of European policy at Climate Change Capital, a London-based investment management and advisory group.

On Tuesday (29 November), shares in firms set up to curb pollution plummeted, while the price of some certified emissions reductions credits (CERs) fell 20% in just one week to below €5 a tonne.

CERs have lost over half of their value in 2011 as the end of the first binding emissions reduction commitments under the Kyoto Protocol draws closer.  

“I don’t think many in the private sector expect much in the way of progress on the big issues at Durban, including a new set of Kyoto targets,” Henry Derwent, president of the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA), told EurActiv.

Derwent was hopeful that progress could be made on “small issues” such as the architecture of the Green Climate Fund, and the design of new market-based mechanisms such as REDD.

“But it would be good if we were closer to agreeing something that would limit or at least work out the size the gap in terms of formal targets we are likely to be facing after 2012,” he said.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • PWR has just returned from a storage conference in Berlin. Yesterday the final speaker noted that in 2010 global RES investments were $210bn up from $30bn in 2005. Given the above, somebody, somewhere has their figures wrong.

    In Europe, from memory, RES investments in terms of GW are running at 60% vs fossil fuel at 40%. The trend, a least in Europe is firmly in favour of RES. Of course in America they do things differently, shale gas anybody?

    With respect to CERs, and CDM, one does hope that CER certificates are printed on soft absorbent paper – that way they will always have a secondary use. What has become clear through numerous papers and research (by universities not by NGOs with an axe to grind) is that CDMs are one of the more interesting confidence tricks that do nothing to reduce emissions but do transfer money from the EU to crooked Indian and Chinese business men (not to mention generating income for various organisation (often Euro) in the CDM food chain. The sooner CDM is flushed down the toilet of history the better. And with respect to Caldecott and his “fears” why would one be frightened at the closure of a confidence trick? – unless of course one is one of the beneficiaries.

    As far as other UN mechanisms go, REDD for example, I notice the axes continue to swing with gay abandon in Indonesia (palm oil anybody?). As a report from Interpol and the World Bank noted (2010), mechanisms to reduce de-forestation are wide open to hijack by organised crime. By they way readers who wonder who is really to blame only need to walk towards the nearest mirror.

    And finally to Durban. Quoting Mr Johannes Remmel, Environment Minister of Nord Rhein Westphalia who spoke at the Berlin storage conference, with respect to Durban he called it “ a stag night out for diplomats” or “a waste of time”. Other memorable quotes “if climate change was a bank we would have fixed it by now”. He also noted that there needs to be a new contract with society with respect to CO2 reduction. Gosh a politico speaking truth to the public – he gets my vote.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    01/12/2011
  • In today's "economic climate" banks/investors are afraid to take much of a chance. But if everyone took that approach, we would never have any innovation. New forms of clean energy is coming, with or without major government or banking support. For my money, the most exciting is Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion, creating endless, clean power, from the temperature difference in ocean water. And the byproducts are clean drinking water, and aquaculture to grow more food. There isn't a single power source anyone is even dreaming up with those kinds of benefits. OTEC plants are on their way to the Bahamas, and other Caribbean nations are lining up to be next. Check out The ON Project for more news and info. OTEC is about to change the lives of millions of people, and if banks don't want to cash in, it will be their loss.

    http://www.theonproject.org/?utm_source=euractiv&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=mscomment

    By :
    Mike Straub
    - Posted on :
    02/12/2011
Background: 

The Copenhagen Accord, agreed at in the Danish capital in December 2009, included a pledge by developed countries to raise $100 billion per year by 2020 to help poor countries fight climate change and adapt to its consequences.

Meeting the following year in Cancún, the 190 nations involved in the UN talks made progress on the establishment of a Green Climate Fund to deliver climate cash to developing countries.

The fund will be governed by a board of 24 members, on which developed and developing countries will be equally represented.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising