EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Delayed action raises costs of climate change, study says

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 03 January 2013

An agreement by almost 200 nations to curb rising greenhouse gas emissions from 2020 will be far more costly than taking action now to tackle climate change, a new report says.

Quick measures to cut emissions would give a far better chance of keeping global warming within an agreed UN limit of 2o Celsius above pre-industrial times to avert more floods, heatwaves, droughts and rising sea levels.

"If you delay action by 10, 20 years you significantly reduce the chances of meeting the 2o target," said Keywan Riahi, one of the authors of the report at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria.

"It was generally known that costs increase when you delay action. It was not clear how quickly they change," he told Reuters on Wednesday (2 January) of the findings in the science journal Nature Climate Change based on 500 computer-generated scenarios.

It said the timing of cuts in greenhouse gases was more important than other uncertainties - about things like how the climate system works, future energy demand, carbon prices or new energy technologies.

The study indicated that an immediate global price of €15 a tonne on emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main greenhouse gas, would give a roughly 60% chance of limiting warming to below 2o.

Wait until 2020 and the carbon price would have to be around €75 a tonne to retain that 60% chance, Riahi told Reuters of the study made with other experts in Switzerland, New Zealand, Australia and Germany.

And a delay of action until 2030 might put the 2o limit - which some of the more pessimistic scientists say is already unattainable - completely out of reach, whatever the carbon price.

"The window for effective action on climate change is closing quickly," wrote Steve Hatfield-Dodds of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia in a separate commentary in Nature.

Governments agreed to the 2o limit in 2010, viewing it as a threshold to avert dangerous climate change. Temperatures have already risen by 0.8o Celsius since wide use of fossil fuels began 200 years ago.

The report also showed that greener policies, such as more efficient public transport or better-insulated buildings, would raise the chances of meeting the 2o goal. 

And fighting climate change would be easier with certain new technologies, such as capturing and burying carbon emissions from power plants and factories. In some scenarios, the 2o goal could not be met unless carbon capture was adopted.

EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • Thanks for keeping us informed

    By :
    Antonio Sarmiento G
    - Posted on :
    03/01/2013
  • Curbing at source demands applying non CO2e emitting technology yet to be perfected. It is critical all parties recognize (a)300yrs of CO2e build-up heads towards global cooling (b)anthropogenic deserts add to change as upper atmosphere reflectors and houses half the worlds population.Combining immediate lowering CO2 and mass planting of that 2-6% of the worlds CO2 sequestering vegetation into deserts to grow soil food fodder (achievable within 1-3 yrs).Well planned can lower 8billion tonnes CO2 essential elements in just one continebt hence expiditing this now 18yrs of COP indecision and lack of leadership, into action. Income via global CO2 carbon trading to UNFCCC 100yr rule will fund such and aid poverty impacted peoples to rebuild their lives and communities. Such practices we have applied in PRC deserts since 2005 see Google. We need a serious change in COP decision makers leaders. CO2e reduction must combined developed nations offsetting CO2e into sinks in developing nations deserts. A great page 3 statement for emitters. Carbon trading under a Global UNFCCC model Trust will manage monies carbon with funds to advance clean energy such as stoichiometric hydrogen Browns gas. 2degree increase-famine even wars and fiscal cliffs avoided. Homo sapiens dont pay rent! Carbon trading passed down to consumers is less than 1 cent in dollar. Cheap homo sapien rent while ensuring food fodder security.No theory but actually in action Robert Vincin hand-on

    By :
    Robert Vincin
    - Posted on :
    04/01/2013
  • Messrs Antonio Sarmiento and Robert Vincin I believe have both written here before and we concur with the issues re-extolled here.

    We must not ignore this issue again and again! There are too amny doubters that continue to espouse the opposite view. It is too late after the event: to do retrospectively is a nonsense when the damage or issue scannot be rectified.

    Placing a bountry of €15-00 per tonne of tCO2eq is perhaps not high enough! However in choosing a sum - and I suggest an even higher one at €45-00 per tCO2eq - would have an immediate effect provided the auditers of such programmes do not procrastinate their awarding of same, or they are really targeted to those issues and Companies that would seriously benefit.

    It is no good playing the rules of the game so that the beneficiaries are told 12 months too late that they are awarded these tCO2eq benefits when they are needed up-front. A procedure of attenuating green-house gases for the Biomass-to Butanol/Ethanol facility in Malta by Applied Biofuels to prevent the dispersion of 3 Million tonnes of tCO2eq over the next 15 years from the 300,000 tonnes per year of wastes when that very funding (€45 Million now!) will kick-start the programme and also asist the Government immediately.

    Likewise the similar programme I read about in South Milford in Yorkshire UK is no good for the Country (UK) when the very issue is that this programme will also prevent 3 Million tonnes of tCO2eq being liberated to the atmosphere over the next 15 years from the 300,000 tonnes of wastes treated and converted to the biofuel Ethanol when financing ths facility for the company is needed now and the Uk needs it as well.

    Similarly the issues of repeating this in the similar programme being developed by the ABL programmes in Ciprus and Greece and Italy etec which are equally so stymied by funding when the availability of the Country to promote such benefits can be raised so early on in the system that they can be assessed and pre-apportioned to these benefits before-hand without waiting for the lengthy approvals systemthat have so be-dogged and hindered their developments.

    What is needed is a new approach where Countries like Malta or Greece or Italy and say even the UK or Irteland and more are given pre-assessed requirements to off-set the tCO2eq now and that these can be called off by rote so that developers in technology areas can access them and their benefits immediately right up front. It isn't necessary always to go through the NDA (National Designated Authority) system to administer this tortuously complex system t get funding. That system is and always was a contrived one that would only benefit the people who generate acres and acres of documents.

    The time is to get real and move this forward.

    The suggestion is that in this way a country might have a sum allotted and this might be say 1200 Million units of "pre-dewsignated" tCO2eq which would be applied to these waste programmes and in the event that two or three came up as in the ABL issues for Malta or in Greece the ramifications of the support funds would be given out through the relevant country (from the pooled sums available) so that these projects would then start without delays. And does it matter that the funds made available meet the whole development? No I think not! The reason for this is that they would be targeted to new and smaller companies (not the mega ones) and ones that really ahve a real chance to obvert these issues such as making Biofuels from Waste and Biomass (not the one that are based upon seriously "questionable environmental technologies" like incineration or CCS or biomass-burning energy issues) for this is not what was intended in this area.

    Wake up EU>

    By :
    Karel
    - Posted on :
    08/01/2013
  • Let's welcome this issue.

    We need this idea in Brescia and throughout Italy as it will be the way to stimulate Green Jobs in our Country as well as cross the EU.

    Let's ensure that this Malta idea with ABL there to make Biofuels gets the ready publicity it needs.

    There's notimng like good news in the EU and i know from my interviews with the founder Director for the Company in Malta that this is just the stepping stone to a whole group of projects that will be triggered across the Mediterranean area because it does not use those awful enzymes and GMO products that have caused problems across the world. I understand that the Malta project is now nearing a start of work being funded at last - WITHOUT ANY MALTESE GOVERNMENTAL OR EU HELP - and whilst there is that opportunity for these two organizations to still assist all fair play to the Company. This sitting off-the-fence by the Government and the EU although good in principle has been the one longest delay in starting the programme.

    Providing 300 construction jobs and 130 to 150 directly-employed personnel with an upstream and downstream employment of up to 600 more people is exactly what a Government Needs. I am now looking forward to hearing that ABL will come to Italy and repeat the same here.

    By :
    Victoria
    - Posted on :
    08/01/2013
Background: 

After the failure of a 2009 summit in Copenhagen to agree a worldwide accord, almost 200 nations have given themselves until 2015 to work out a global deal to cut greenhouse gas emissions that will enter into force in 2020.

Amid an economic slowdown, many countries at the last UN meeting on climate change in Qatar in December expressed reluctance to make quick shifts away from fossil fuels towards cleaner energies such as wind or solar power.

There is no global price on carbon, only regional markets - in a European Union trading system, for instance, where industrial emitters must pay off they exceed their CO2 quotas, 2013 prices are about €6.7 a tonne.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising