EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Energy bosses demand urgent carbon price action

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 15 December 2011

Leaders of some of Europe’s biggest energy companies have written to European Commission President José Manuel Barroso demanding urgent action to stop a complete collapse of the carbon price.

“The economic crisis has significantly impacted the effectiveness of the EU ETS as seen by today’s low level of trading and carbon price,” says the letter from the EU Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change (EUCLG), whose patron is Britain's Prince Charles.

“It is critical that the European Institutions take decisive action now,” the letter says, calling for a withholding of allowances in auctions for the 2008-2012 Phase III of the emissions trading scheme, or ETS, and a recalibration of the mechanism for the next phase.

While the corporate group has not taken a position on the amount of allowances that would need to be withheld, Trevor Sikorski, the head of carbon research at Barclays Capital has, estimated a surplus of over a billion EU and international carbon credits for the 2008-2012 period.

Yesterday (December 14) benchmark EU and UN carbon credits plunged to record lows of €6.53 a metric tonne, and €3.99 a metric tonne, respectively – a fall of some 60% on their value since June.

Carbon credit crunch

As a carbon credit crunch loomed, EUCLG Director Sandrine Dixson-Declève told EurActiv that a healthy carbon price would be closer to €30.

“Because investors do not necessarily want to take a risk on clean technology projects, the viability of these projects is definitely being undermined with such a low carbon price,” she said.

As a result of the carbon price crash, the EUCLG – which represents energy giants such as Shell, Alstom, Philips and Dong Energy – argues that the ETS is failing to create incentives to shift toward decarbonisation.

The letter notes other deflationary price signals that could be on the way, and says it is “therefore imperative that these potential impacts are taken into account and measures are put into place to ensure the viability of the EU ETS before it is too late.”

Cap and trade

Carbon credits were established under the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 as a cap-and-trade mechanism for allowing industrialised countries to offset their carbon dioxide emissions by investing in carbon-reduction projects in the developing world.

After five consecutive years of robust growth, spurred by implementation of Phase III of the EU’s trading scheme, the total value of the world’s carbon markets touched $142 billion (€109 billion) this year, and then hit the buffers, as the economic crisis bit.

Without a strong price for carbon - or equivalent measures - many industrialists fear that the current downward carbon price spiral could accelerate.

“We need to look at the impact of the economic situation on the proper functioning of the ETS as we are in a recession that we’re all expecting will triple dip,” Dixson-Declève said.  

As well as withholding allowances, she said that in Phase IV of the ETS, some companies would favour a reserve price option in permit auctions, to prevent carbon credits being sold at too low a level.

Next steps: 
  • 1 Jan. 2012: Aviation brought into the ETS
  • 1 Jan. 2012: California carbon market due to begin trading
  • 1 Jan. 2013: Phase IV of the ETS begins
  • 2015: Australia to launch Emissions Trading Scheme
  • 2015: UNFCC mandated to agree a new globally binding climate deal for implementation by 2020
  • 2020: EU member states obliged to have reduced carbon emissions 20% on 1990 levels, and increased the share of renewables in the energy mix by the same amount.
  • 2020: UNFCCC global climate deal to be activated
Arthur Neslen
Background: 

Under the Kyoto Protocol, industrialised countries can meet part of their climate targets by investing in carbon-reduction projects in developing countries.

The arrangement, called the Clean Development Mechanism, operates on the condition that projects generating credits have to ensure 'additionality', or the principle that the reductions they achieve would not have occurred without the incentive of foreign finance.

The mechanism has attracted criticism, however, as the additionality criterion has been abused. Credits granted for projects that should not have qualified in the first place have allowed developed countries to dodge their climate commitments, critics say.

In January 2009, the European Commission presented a proposal for a global agreement to replace the Kyoto Protocol. The blueprint proposed an overhaul of the mechanism to ensure that only projects delivering additional reductions and targeting more costly cuts receive credits.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising