EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Europe’s airline CEOs blast “crazy” carbon pricing scheme

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 25 May 2012, updated 09 July 2012

Europe’s airline executives launched a new salvo against the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) yesterday (24 May), just weeks before an international working group is due to make new proposals aimed at resolving the dispute over pricing air carbon emissions.

CEO’s from 13 of Europe’s top airlines lined up at a press conference in the Brussels airport's Sheraton Hotel to savage the ETS as “crazy” at a time when economic growth was imperative.  

“Europe can’t afford a trade war at a time like this,” said Willie Walsh, CEO for the International Airlines Group, British Airways parent group. “The Commission has to move quickly to defuse the tensions that exist and which are rising on a daily basis.”

CEO’s from 13 of Europe’s top airlines lined up at a press conference in the Brussels airport's Sheraton Hotel to savage the ETS as “crazy” at a time when economic growth was imperative.  

“Europe can’t afford a trade war at a time like this,” said Willie Walsh, CEO for the International Airlines Group, British Airways parent group. “The Commission has to move quickly to defuse the tensions that exist and which are rising on a daily basis.”

Walsh said that he had expressed the industry’s “anger and frustration” at what he called the EU’s “arrogant approach” in unilaterally imposing the ETS on the world, at a meeting with the EU’s vice-president and transport commissioner, Siim Kallas.

All but 10 airlines have signed up to the ETS, which obliges companies using European air space to buy some allowances to offset each tonne of their carbon emissions, although 85% of them have been given away free.

But “you should not confuse compliance with agreement,” Walsh warned. Opposition to the ETS was “widespread” and “growing” he said, due to fears of uncontrolled trade retaliation which would hit the air industry before other sectors, he said.

“The world is becoming a global village,” Bernard Gustin, the head of Brussels Airlines told EurActiv. “Lets be sure Europe is not the fool of the village.”

Air industry split

Despite the strong words from the 34 carriers represented by the Association of European Airlines [AEA], Europe’s aviation industry is split on carbon pricing.

Short-haul carriers that may charge offsets of as little as 30 cents a flight are more supportive of ETS than long-haul companies, which the EU says may pass on  price hikes of between €2 and €12.

“All this talk of trade wars is actually offering considerable leverage to those who are opposing [the ETS],” one airline industry source told EurActiv. “Why would you talk it up like that?”

“Its strong background music and I don’t think it is helpful,” the source added.

What environmentalists see as a near-paranoia among long-haul carriers over a perceived competitive disadvantage in the cut-throat air industry has been heightened by a Chinese decision to ban its air companies from participating in the ETS. 

China says the ETS infringes on its national sovereignty.

Airbus has claimed that Beijing blocked purchases of its aircraft in a retaliatory move, and India says that it could follow suit in barring its airlines from participating in the ETS.

In response, the EU has threatened sanctions against airlines that fail to comply with the ETS by mid-June, while also pledging to amend its legislation if a global deal can be agreed in talks at the International Civil Air Organisation (ICAO).

Possible solutions

In mid-June, an ICAO working group is also expected to propose one of four Market-Based Mechanisms currently under consideration as a possible solution to the dispute, at a November ICAO Council meeting.   

Insiders say that the China and India are currently blocking the talks, arguing that the UNFCCC principle of ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’ should reduce their proportional contribution to mitigating climate change.

But progress has been made and China has shown what one source in Brussels called “signals of flexibility [that are] worth exploring further”. 

The EU believes that with political will, a deal could be possible after the presidential elections in November.

Earlier this week, it was reported that two private Chinese companies linked to Beijing’s federal government had begun drawing up rules for an equivalent carbon trading scheme to regulate the country’s air emissions.

In a further sign that tensions over the issue were subsiding, the EU called for China to play a “stronger role” in the ICAO talks.

“It is a strange time to be having this [AEA] conference,” John Hanlon, the secretary general of the European Low Fares Airline Association (ELFAA) told EurActiv. “It’s almost as if they’re shooting across the boughs of ICAO.”

The ETS was “the best thing we’ve come up with until now,” Hanlon continued, “but it would be even better if we could address [aviation emissions] on a global scale.”

Positions: 

''Let's get the proportions right,” the EU’s spokesman Isaac Valero Ladron told EurActiv in an emailed statement. “In this debate the aviation industry at times seems to imply we are talking about enormous sums of money per ticket. And the truth is that the increase less than the cost of a cup of coffee at the airport.”

“Instead of criticising the system,” he continued, “it would be wiser to spend all this time and energy in helping the EU get the long-awaited global agreement in ICAO. As we have repeatedly said, the day we get this global deal, we would be happy to amend our legislation''

Bill Hemmings of the environmental group Transport & Environment agreed. “The EU has said they will change the aviation ETS if ICAO comes up with a global solution,” he told EurActiv. “What’s needed now is less shrill voices and more level heads pulling together to ensure ICAO delivers by the end of the year.”

Next steps: 
  • Mid-June: ICAO working group due to propose solution to ETS dispute
  • Mid-June: EU has threatened eight Chinese and two Indian airlines with sanctions for non-compliance with the ETS.
  • November: An ICAO Council is expected to consider the working group proposals
  • March 2013: International airlines must begin buying ETS credits for use in European airspace.
Arthur Neslen

COMMENTS

  • A customer speaks: hey Willie - I don't mind paying the surcharge - I do not fly often but when I do it is usually long distance. Airlines should be in ETS and the only reason the EU implemented it is because that sponsor of luxury hotels ICAO failed to reach any agreement after years of meetings (and luxury hotel sponsorship). Many of the ICAO members are doorknobs when it comes to any meaningful action on climate change. This raises the question, Wille, are you one of the doorknobs - cause you sure sound like one.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    25/05/2012
  • The EU is the laughing stock of the developing world: financially bust, yet still with the arrogance of a former power base, trying to call the shots on 'climate change' of all things. Climate change tax will defeat the ridiculous EU, and Connie is the epitome of the crusader trying to solve this non-problem. Climate will do what it will, regardless of EU or Connie. China and India etc should tell Connie and EU to shove carbon taxes where the sun doesn't shine. Time to dump Airbus stocks and buy Boeing. Faith in the failing EU and its ridiculously retarded policies is at an all-low.

    See what Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace now thinks of the CO2/Green groups:
    http://www.environmentaltrends.org/single/article/sensible-environmentalism.html
    http://www.greenspirit.com/logbook.cfm?msid=83

    By :
    J
    - Posted on :
    26/05/2012
  • At least China and India have some clout and can influence the EU Commission, unlike the rest of us poor EU citizens. The ETS is another example - there are many - of political will trying to overide reality, common semnse, and even the laws of physics (harmonising EU electricity supply, remember?)

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    28/05/2012
  • @J
    your comment is quite offensive. i assume you live in europe and take clean air for granted. i suggest you make a detour in downtown shanghai, in delhi or johannesburg and get a taste of pollution. then take another detour to vanuatu and the maldives to talk to people directly affected by raising levels of the sea.
    then you'll remove the inverted comas from "climate change" and you will start appreciating these "retarded" policies

    By :
    zeno
    - Posted on :
    29/05/2012
  • I suggest that "J" is perhaps an American given the use of "retarded". I have no doubt that "J" is a great supporter of property rights - I wonder if that extends to property in danger of dissappearing under the water due to emissions in the USA (amongst other places) - or is this question a bit tricky?

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    29/05/2012
  • @zeno:
    First, thank you for your reply.
    Secondly, as you seem to have poor knowledge of punctuation (lack of capitalisation), I will assume that English is not your first language. Either that, or you did not do very well at school.
    Now, I will answer your points, one by one.

    As you correctly pointed out, European (& USA) air is generally much cleaner than the places you mentioned. That is because we have strict environmental standards, developed over many years. Research "London smog 1952" if you doubt this. Here's a page for you to read on this subject:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Smog

    The pollution you mention though, has nothing to do with CO2. CO2 is not a pollutant, although the CAGW-believers will tell you that it is. Ask the plant world if CO2 is a pollutant. CO2 is required by photosynthesis, and more CO2 makes plants grow faster and with less water - good news for a growing world population that requires more food.

    So if you want to blame somebody for China's, India's and South Africa's bad air quality, then why not blame those countries' governments for having poor environmental standards? Blaming the USA for other people's pollution is bizarre, so I request that you explain your issue more clearly.

    Regarding sea level, you cannot be serious, and are apparently repeating some misinformation from some environmental website.

    If you want to learn about sea level, then why not read some reports from some of the world's authorities on sea level, rather than from a Greenpeace 'How to answer climate sceptics' cribsheet?

    I will help you by providing a link to a report from one of the world's leading authorities on sea level - Dr Nils-Axel Mörner:
    'Kiribati sea level story – Dr Nils-Axel Mörner responds exclusively':
    http://autonomousmind.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/kiribati-sea-level-story-dr-nils-axel-morner-responds-exclusively/

    I hope you enjoy reading the links provided above, and I look forward to hearing from you when you have done your research.

    If you do bother to reply to my post here, then please provide links to your assertions, rather than pure unspported opinion.

    Thanks again, and good day to you.

    By :
    J
    - Posted on :
    31/05/2012
  • @Mike Parr:
    Rather than guessing or assuming, perhaps you'd like to focus on scientific facts, as just posted in reply to 'zeno'?

    For your information, your guesses were wrong.

    I use strong words because I have studied this subject extensively over many years, and so know both sides of the CAGW story, and I am not impressed by the misinformation put forward by CAGW believers.

    By :
    J
    - Posted on :
    31/05/2012
  • Well, no surprises, the uninformed dare not reply when faced with the facts. Where are you, you cowards?

    By :
    J
    - Posted on :
    31/05/2012
Background: 

In an effort to tackle aviation's small but fast-growing contribution to climate change, the European Commission issued a legislative proposal in December 2006 to bring it into the EU's Emission Trading System (ETS).

This involved imposing a cap on carbon dioxide emissions for all planes arriving or departing from EU airports, while allowing airlines to buy and sell 'pollution credits' on the bloc's carbon market, and so reward low carbon-emitting aviation.

The legislation took effect on 1 January 2012. But non-EU governments and airlines have threatened legal action or trade retaliation unless they are granted exemptions. China's official aviation body, the China Air Transport Association (CATA), says that the ETS would cost its airlines $123 million in the scheme's first year, and more than triple that by 2020. The country also claims special dispensation as a developing country.

EU officials say that China has a higher GDP than Greece or Portugal and question why its businessmen should be exempted from paying the same carbon taxes that others do.

The EU also allows ETS exemptions for governments that take equivalent measures to curb aviation emissions. But Brussels has not said what these might be. China's aviation regulator has already asked all airline carriers to cut their energy and carbon intensity by 22% by 2050.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising