Climate Action Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said that the €14 billion sum was a 20% increase on the previous package, demonstrating the EU’s commitment to paying its fair share of long-term climate finance.
But there was one note of caution. “The EU and other advanced economies will face serious fiscal constraints in the years to come,” she said.
“Therefore, climate finance cannot only be public money alone. We need innovative sources of financing, in particular, in the private sector and carbon markets,” she said.
The announcement comes amidst deadlock in Durban on the make up and launch of a $100 billion (€74.5 billion) a year Green Climate Fund in 2020.
One draft text circulating in the South African city of Durban on 6 December reportedly proposed raising money for the fund through a tariff on carbon dioxide emissions in the global maritime sector.
But delegates professed scepticism about a breakthrough deal of this nature.
Global climate finance
On 6 December, the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) also reported that $22.9 billion - or 15% - of their members' official development assistance went towards climate aid to the developing world in 2010.
A third of that money was spent on helping poor nations adapt to the effects of climate change, such as droughts and floods.
The rest - $17.6 billion – was spent on climate mitigation measures to help curb growing emissions of greenhouse gases in the emerging economies. This figure was up 69% on 2009, the OECD said.
“Going forward, we urge donors to step up bringing in both mitigation and adaptation considerations into their development policies,” the OECD’s secretary-general Angel Gurria said in the statement.
COMMENTS
There are many ways to raise money:
border carbon tax rejected by the EU but none the less quite practical
financial transactions tax - rejected by tory-scum and the Uk finance sector - but again quite practical
internal carbon taxes - quite practical - given the efforts by companies to understand their carbon footprints
taxing fuel on energy content easy to implement
What is lacking is political will even within the EU.
Another way would be to stop subsidising the Oil and Fuel Companies by the €600 Billion a year and divert this to better uses.
Does Shell, BP, ENEL, Total-Elf, Exon-Mobil really need subsidies to sell Oil?
Is it really necessary to subsidise the major Gas companies in their developments to sell the Fossil Fuel "Natural" Gas to us the consumer.
The EU needs to get a handle on these subsidies as We the Public are only seeing Our Money being pushed down the throats of the Share-Holders and not to our benefit.
My suggestion is to re-enact these subsidies towards the ultimate goal of doing what Denmark and Malta and other countries are doing and that is to make them 50% free from importing Fossil Fuels for energy use, and in that developing the wind, tidal, solar, photo-voltaic, hot rock, systems that we are seeing spring up around the world.
EurActiv reserves its right to remove comments regarded as offensive, racist, or homophobic as well as hate-speech in general. Spamming or posts with an obvious commercial character will be removed as well. Thank you for your understanding.