EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Extra climate meetings agreed as treaty remains elusive

Published 12 April 2010 - Updated 14 April 2010
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

The first UN climate meeting since Copenhagen agreed to hold extra talks before the high-level conference in Cancún at the end of the year, but hopes for a new climate treaty ran low.

Delegates from 175 countries met in Bonn over the weekend (9-11 April) to draw up a plan for a new legally-binding global climate treaty.

They agreed to beef up the negotiating calendar with two additional meetings. The new gatherings will both last at least a week and will be held during the second half of the year. They also gave the chair of the talks, Margaret Mukahanana-Sangarwe of Zimbabwe, a mandate to draw up a draft text for the next round of negotiations in Bonn between 31 May and 11 June.

But while the negotiators spent hours agreeing on the relatively simple matter of the number of meetings, they failed to draw up a timetable for achieving a final agreement and the milestones to get there.

The Bonn meeting brought to the surface underlying disagreements between developed and developing countries, which have become evident in the debate surrounding the role of the non-binding Copenhagen Accord agreed at the close of the Copenhagen climate conference in December.

The US would like to see the Copenhagen Accord, endorsed by two-thirds of the countries that attended the talks, form the basis for the new negotiations. But many developing countries, headed by China and India, argue that the negotiations need to be kept under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

The accord's main advantage for developing countries is that it includes a commitment from industrialised nations to provide climate funding for poor countries. But it does not include any country-specific emissions reduction targets. Analysis shows that the pledges currently on the table will fall far short of keeping global warming below the agreed 2°C.

The meeting's conclusions do not mention the Copenhagen Accord specifically, but leave open the possibility for the chair to draw upon the document when compiling the new negotiating text.

No treaty in sight

The lack of a specific roadmap means that the June talks in Bonn will have to continue to debate operational issues rather than moving on to debating the substance of any future treaty.

After the Bonn meeting, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) chief Yvo de Boer repeated his belief that it will not be possible to conclude a new agreement in Cancún (EurActiv 25/03/10).

Negotiations this year will need to "conclude on mitigation targets and action, a package on adaptation, a new technology mechanism, financial arrangements, ways to deal with deforestation and a capacity-building framework," he said.

Positions: 

A leaked document outlining the US government's strategy for the UN climate negotiations revealed the Obama administration's determination to see the Copenhagen Accord accepted as the basis of the negotiating text as a whole, rather than negotiating elements of it as developing countries would prefer, the Guardian reported.

"Create a clear understanding of the CA's [Copenhagen Accord's] standing and the importance of operationalising ALL elements," states the text under a list of key objectives.

Yvo de Boer, the UNFCCC executive secretary, told BBC News that the chances of seeing a new treaty this year are "very slim".

"I think that developing countries will want to see what the nature of an agreement is going to be before they will be willing to turn it into a legally-binding treaty, so that basically means a two-step process," he said.

Grenada's Ambassador Dessima Williams, who chairs the Association of Small Island States (Aosis), told BBC News that there are still hurdles to cross in terms of what a new global deal might look like.

"The question now is whether or not there will be a sense of ethical commitment [from high-emitting countries]," she said. "The situation of climate change is not as dramatic as an eathquake, but it is of equal proportion, [and] there's a greater burden of responsibility on the major emitters."

Jan Kowalzig of Oxfam Germany argued that the EU should compensate for the lack of a clear timetable for achieving a deal by making a unilateral commitment to increase its emissions reduction target to 30% by 2020, mobilising its share of fast-track funding, and putting a figure on its share of long-term funding.

"To unlock this deadlock, the EU should before the summit in Cancún put on the table a very clear understanding of what they are ready to provide in terms of financial support for developing countries," he said.

Next steps: 
  • 31 May - 11 June: Next session of climate talks in Bonn.
  • Second half of 2010: Two additional meetings.
  • 29 Nov.–10 Dec.: Cancún climate conference.
Background: 

The Copenhagen conference in December 2009 was designed to achieve a new agreement to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.

But after two weeks of extenuating talks, world leaders delivered an agreement that left Europeans disappointed, as it did not include binding commitments to cut greenhouse gas emissions (EurActiv 19/12/09).

The face-saving deal, dubbed the 'Copenhagen Accord', established a goal to keep global temperature rises below 2°C in order to avoid dangerous climate change.

The Copenhagen Accord prescribed that developed countries would provide close to $30 billion in so-called 'fast-start' aid for developing countries for 2010-2012, rising to $100 billion a year by 2020.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising