EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Hedegaard: Hurricane Sandy 'in line with' climate predictions

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 07 November 2012, updated 14 December 2012

EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard has put Hurricane Sandy in the same bracket as a series of extreme weather events predicted by climate scientists.

Speaking in Brussels yesterday (6 November), Hedegaard was careful to add a caveat that scientists would need to establish specific causes for the unprecedented hurricane that devastated New York.

“It’s always tricky to say that one storm is due to climate change,” she said.

“But it is a coincidence, isn’t it, that so many weather events that we are studying around the planet seem to be so much in line with what scientists had warned us would happen.”

One climate scientist told EurActiv that he believed sea surface warming caused by climate change had influenced the hurricane’s strength.

The disaster also moved the independent New York mayor, Michael Bloomberg, to endorse the incumbent president Barack Obama, along with his news agency’s magazine, which ran a classic cover that simply stated: “It’s global warming, stupid”.  

Up to 40,000 New Yorkers are still homeless after the hybrid tropical cyclone-winter storm made landfall, bringing storm surges and devastating winds in its wake.

More than 110 Americans died in the hurricane and some experts say that its final financial costs could top $40 billion (€31.7 billion).

“Those are the sports of consequences that we’re going to see more and more of in the future,” Hedegaard said.

The costs of climate inaction would be more expensive than investment now, she added. “While we’re busy handling the financial crisis we must not forget that we still have a climate crisis coming up.”

Hedegaard cited the record Arctic sea ice melt, as well as other storms, droughts and forest fires.   

“That is often difficult for finance ministers to understand,” she said. “The kind of costs from hurricane sandy and the drought [are] the costs you never design politically, that you never want to pay, but they are just the ones that land on your table.”

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • The great dane of the EU-commission is barking up the wrong tree, again!
    Level headed analysts have concluded nothing out of the ordinary with Sandy. Except for one thing, it hit a densely populated area with a lot of high value property. A lot of stupid people with money want to live near the sea.
    When people lived with, by and of the sea, they knew her strength. They set up their houses some distance from the shore and only had the buildings necessary for their work on the shore.

    By :
    Mats Jangdal
    - Posted on :
    07/11/2012
  • Commissioner Hedegaard could have gained some respect if she had waited for scientists to study the facts and analyse the causes of Hurricane Sandy. Instead she blows her mouth off again and discredits her office.

    By :
    James D
    - Posted on :
    07/11/2012
  • Well, at least they have not said "man-made" climate change - YET!! The climate is always changing, isn't it? Does not the planet respond to differing conditions, traumatic or not? I understand, for example, that the Sahara was once a fertile, green plain and now, it is just a mighty desert. Perhaps that was climate change brought on by dinosaur methane (the mind boggles when comparing saurine to bovine levels of production!)or maybe there were a few Neanderthals (close relations of the climate change scaremongerers) whose camp fires were the cause? Can't wait for the next load of bollocks about climate and why we all should go back to living in caves.

    By :
    Don Latuske
    - Posted on :
    07/11/2012
  • Don,
    I agree and argue just like you that change is the only ever constant in nature.

    But the according to the article above Hedegaard clearly states: "The costs of climate inaction would be more expensive than investment now, she added."

    This means that she truly believes that we can tailor climate to our benefit. Since the only measurement proposed is to reduce CO2 output, this is her only "tool" to activate for shielding mankind from Sandys to come.

    She also refers to the models, but they have consistently been wrong and on top of that misinterpreted!

    All in all, throwing any amount of money on the "climate problem" is money washed away at sea, vanished into thin air.

    By :
    Mats Jangdal
    - Posted on :
    07/11/2012
  • There was a hurricane of the same magnitude in the same area as Sandy in 1821. Of course there was no EU in those days, but there were plenty of scientifically ignorant folk around, as well as plain old fashioned idiots and self opinionated buffoons to take the place of the EC. Nothing much changed then.

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    07/11/2012
  • Congratulations, Eutopia. you have a minister of wind and rain... she managed to say that it's difficut to say it, but said it anyway. What a joke.

    It's foolish. It was a milder and weaker year than most for hurricanes, and NOTHING compared to the 1950s.

    By :
    Joe
    - Posted on :
    07/11/2012
  • Given that the eco-crapitalists constantly warn of climate catastrophe , how could any storm not "be so much in line with" with their predictions .

    The fact that there was a much more widely destructive autumn storm in 1938 ( see the WPA footage on YouTube ) and a storm surge which must have been about twice as high drowning Lower Manhattan in 1821 are only noise , perhaps caused by too little CO2 .

    By :
    Bob Armstrong
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
Background: 

Extreme weather events are rare, which means that statistics are not always available to analyse them. But the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s extreme weather report found it probable that the incidence of heat waves and floods had increased in recent years, although there are strong regional variations.

A rise in extreme coastal high water related to increases in mean sea level was also rated at between 66%-90% probability.

IPCC scientists also expressed confidence that droughts were becoming more intense and longer, particularly in southern Europe and West Africa, but in central North America and northwestern Australia the reverse seemed to be happening.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising