EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

MEPs push for strong EU role in climate talks

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 17 November 2011, updated 14 December 2012

The European Parliament called yesterday (16 November) for the EU to have a leading role in the forthcoming UN climate change conference in Durban and to push for the extension of the Kyoto protocol unless a new legally binding deal is agreed.

With the international negotiations on climate change balancing on a thin rope, the MEPs sent a clear message to the EU's summit negotiators and reiterated the EU pledge to cut emissions 20% by 2020.

"We must address loopholes and redefine commitments made in Copenhagen and Cancun," said Jo Leinen, chairman of the parliamentary committee on environment. "Existing official pledges amount to only half of what is needed to limit the temperature increase to 2°C. And this temperature is the red line to keep climate change under control." 

The resolution made special mention of the need to further reduce carbon emissions beyond 20%, saying it would create economic benefit through 'green jobs' and 'green growth'.

The resolution was supported by the five main political groups in Parliament and was approved on a vote of 532 to 76, with 43 abstentions.

The MEPs want the EU to speak with one voice at the South African summit and to have clear proposals for future measures that other countries will follow as well. 

At the same time they invited EU to clarify its commitment to the Kyoto Protocol and confirm its capability to pass on the second phase of the implementation measures. 

Special mention was made to the so-called 'gigatonne gap', or the difference between the current international commitments and the target of average global warming reduction to 2°C set by the UN. 

Positions: 

"The EP has today sent a clear message that EU needs to stop prevaricating and instead finally commit to continuing with the Kyoto Protocol beyond 2012. With the UN climate talks in a state of protracted limbo, a clear commitment from the EU to Kyoto beyond 2012 would give a new impetus to the talks and the need for a comprehensive binding international climate agreement" , said MEP Bas Eickhout, representative of  the Green party on the European Parliament delegation to the Durban conference.

Danish MEP Dan Jørgensen, S&D spokesperson on climate change, said: "We have many proposals on how to finance these projects. The financial crisis is no excuse to let our developing partners down. "Industrialized countries have a moral obligation to help less developed countries in building capacity to mitigate and adapt to the negative climatic effects we have unleashed."

"We must boost climate diplomacy to get the critical mass needed to bridge the gap between the expiration date of Kyoto Protocol I by the end of 2012 and the signature of the new protocol. All our energies should be focused on trying to gain support from emerging countries and from the US to progress on the way to a comprehensive legally binding agreement to be achieved by 2015," said Jo Leinen, chairman of the parliamentary committee on Environment.

"As we speak, glaciers are melting. We urgently need to find new measures to close the remaining 'gigatonne gap' between our greenhouse gas 'budget' for 2020 and our actual emission pathways", he said.

Next steps: 
  • 28 Nov.-9 Dec. 2011: UN climate conference in Durban, South Africa.
EurActiv.com
Background: 

The 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which entered into force in 2005, commits its 183 signatories to reducing their collective greenhouse gas emissions by 5.2% by 2012 from 1990 levels.

To this end, it established a carbon market – the Clean Development Mechanism – under which emissions credits could be allocated and traded. Under Kyoto, the EU as a whole was required to make an 8% reduction in its greenhouse gas emissions, and the bloc pioneered the implementation of an Emissions Trading Scheme.

Developing countries on the whole support Kyoto because it allocates binding targets for emissions reductions, and applies only to industrialised nations. These countries, say the emerging economies, have been responsible for the vast majority of CO2 in the atmosphere.

But countries such as the United States, which withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol under President George W. Bush, disagree. They point to studies which suggest that the developing world is now responsible for the majority of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, and argue that this ratio is only projected to increase.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising