EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Nuclear phaseout costs may hurt Germany's green ambitions

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 29 August 2012

Germany may have to slow down its planned transformation to green energy, Environment Minister Peter Altmaier said in an effort to assuage worries that consumers will bear the brunt of the immense costs of the switch from nuclear.

A year before an election, fears of rising energy bills in Europe's biggest economy have become a major concern for Chancellor Angela Merkel's centre-right government which has ambitious targets for renewables to replace atomic power.

Thanks in part to a law that guarantees renewables above-market rates, Germany has seen a rapid expansion in solar panels and wind turbines. With about 25% of German power already derived from green sources, experts say it is well on track to hit its 2020 goal of 35%.

"If we keep up the current tempo, we will soon have a surplus of energy which will have to be reduced," Altmaier told the Financial Times Deutschland  on yesterday (28 August). "That would serve no one."

Altmaier said the rapid and expensive expansion of green power was causing high costs for consumers, who end up footing at least some of the bill, and putting strains on the grid. "These are costs that can be avoided with good planning."

The German unit of Swedish energy group Vattenfall said on Monday consumers may end up paying up to 30% more by 2020 to pay for the switch which will require investments of about €150 billion.

Some members of Merkel's government want a new law which would reduce the burden on consumers who have a fee added to their power bills to help fund the switch to renewables.

Economy Minister Philipp Rösler, leader of the pro-business Free Democrats (FDP) junior coalition partner, wants a major reform of the law before the 2013 election. Altmaier, a conservative, agrees a rethink is needed but not immediately.

"It is a very complex subject, so we need time," Altmaier told the newspaper, adding a major reform stood no chance of being passed by parliament for the time being.

'Unacceptable' comments

A senior opposition Social Democrat, Ulrich Kelber, criticised Altmaier's comments, saying: "It is completely unacceptable to slow the expansion of renewable energy."

Kelber said the government had failed to present a coherent plan to upgrade the power grid which would help expansion of offshore wind power, seen as a key renewable energy source.

The uproar over prices in Germany - which has the second-highest power prices in Europe - has intensified before a decision in October on whether to raise the fee paid by consumers.

Merkel has vowed to keep the 2012 charge to consumers at 3.6 cents a kilowatt hour stable in coming years. However, most experts believe the fee will rise to more than 5 cents in 2013.

Such a jump would mean most households would pay an extra €70 on an average annual power bill of €900. They already pay €150 for green power.

Fuelling resentment among some voters is an exemption granted to power-intensive industry, crucial for Germany's big manufacturing sector, which lobbied hard for relief, saying higher bills would put firms' competitiveness at risk.

If Merkel's government does decide to scale back the transformation due to concerns about the costs to the consumer, the offshore wind sector could be the main victim.

Progress in the sector, originally seen as one of the main sources for green power, has been slow due to higher than expected costs and regulatory questions which have deterred investors. Merkel's cabinet is expected today to approve a draft law designed to help the expansion of offshore wind parks.

Next steps: 
  • 29 Aug.: Chancellor Angela Merkel's cabinet is expected to approve a draft law designed to help the expansion of offshore wind farms.
EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • This German obsession with renewable energy will be its undoing. Anyone who knows anything about renewable energy, and who is honest, will tell you that renewable energy is intermittent. When it's cloudy or there is little wind, renewable energy sources perform very badly indeed, requiring reliable parallel backup energy sources to draw upon, and these need to be able to ramp up or down quickly to avoid brownouts or even blackouts. This makes the backup energy sources inefficient and expensive.

    The who renewable energy system is extremely badly thought-out.

    If the Germans & other renewable-energy-obsessed counties could shake off their irrational fear of other reliable sources of energy like shale gas and, later hopefully, things like LFTR (thorium), energy would be abundant and extremely cheap, making economies strong and durable once again.

    However, if you study UN Agenda 21, one can see that they want to cause industrial crash in developed economies, so the stupidity that is occurring with expensive, unreliable renewable energy appears to be part of the plan to crash our economies, perverse as this appears to sane, rational people. To understand their game, I strongly recommend curious people to read up on UN Agenda 21, the UN agenda for the 21st century. Here's a good place to start:
    http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/

    By :
    SplitTheBanks
    - Posted on :
    29/08/2012
  • I forgot to mention that you may think that you have never heard of UN Agenda 21, but you are probably mistaken, due to it being marketed under the misleading term of 'Sustainable Development' - a misnomer if ever there was one. There is nothing sustainable in crashing developed economies. Serfdom would be a better description of it.

    UN Agenda 21 is being coordinated from Germany by an organisation called ICLEI in Bonn. They try to make each local council within each country implement UN Agenda 21 aka 'Sustainable Development'. It is not a benign project, as you will discover once you read the documentation of UN Agenda 21.

    In a nutshell, population panickers like (1) Maurice Strong (marxist/communist), (2) Paul R. Ehrlich (The Population Bomb), and (3) Club of Rome, worry that population will exceed available resources including oil and food, so they create memes like Peak Oil and Overpopulation to try to solve the problems that they see, rather than applying human ingenuity to forge ahead in a strong, confident manner to help humanity adapt by developing strong & reliable energy sources, and learning to help developing nations pull themselves up into relative wealth and health through trade.

    So next time you hear about your energy prices going up and up and up, think of these sad people, whose inability to envision a prosperous and healthy future due to their false reasoning and ideologies, is forcing us all into a dystopian future.

    Somebody should have told them that if you want to prevent rapid birthrates continuing (due to high mortality, caused by lack of access to clean water, domestic fuel and food), then you need to think how you can remedy these problems.

    By :
    SplitTheBanks
    - Posted on :
    29/08/2012
  • Recommended reading:

    1. Václav Klaus: The arrogance of the global-warming alarmists is appalling:
    http://newnostradamusofthenorth.blogspot.be/2012/08/vaclav-klaus-arrogance-of-global.html

    2. UN Agenda 21 aka Sustainable Development &
    Promoting Sustainable Human Settlement Development:
    http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/
    http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_07.shtml

    3. http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/

    4. Maurice Strong, the man behind Agenda 21, by Dr. Eric Karlstrom, January, 2012
    http://www.naturalclimatechange.us/EK%20NWReligion%20Html/Part%20I.%20%20Is%20Crestone12_31_11.htm

    5. Behind The Green Mask, by Rosa Koire:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDtCb45Lqt0
    http://www.amazon.com/BEHIND-THE-GREEN-MASK-Agenda/dp/0615494544/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1346271375&sr=8-1&keywords=BEHIND+THE+GREEN+MASK

    By :
    SplitTheBanks
    - Posted on :
    29/08/2012
  • Reply to SpiltTheBanks: Great comments! Politicians & enviro-terrorists have been fooling people, but now that the real costs of their fear-mongering are coming out, people are starting to resist. Who did they THINK was going to pay for it? Consumers want their bills lower, so government can pay , but governments only spend the taxes that they collect form the consumers anyway. Let industry & big business pay: well then they will raise their prices or go bankrupt, so the consumers & taxpayers are stuck with the bill no matter how you spin it.

    Enormous costs to pay for an ineffective response to a crisis that doesn't exist! The West is doomed if this is the best we can do. I guess bankrupt governments, no industry and no jobs will reduce CO2 emissions from Europe-but I bet the people won't like it.

    Read more in Kids Before Trees: get it at https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/80505

    By :
    Geoff Sander
    - Posted on :
    01/09/2012
  • Thanks Geoff. I'll take a look at your 'Kids before Trees' text...

    Indeed, once people learn to think for themselves, turn the brainwashing TV off for a while, and learn to read from multiple differing information sources instead of only from a small number of politically-loaded newspapers/TV channels, they will start to see that things aren't quite what they seem ;-)

    By :
    SplitTheBanks
    - Posted on :
    03/09/2012
Background: 

In May 2011, Germany announced that it would shut all its nuclear reactors by 2022, following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan.

Eight of Germany's oldest 17 nuclear reactors were permanently shut soon afterwards and another six are slated to be taken offline by 2021.

The remaining three reactors, Germany's newest, will stay open for another year until 2022 as a safety buffer to ensure no disruption to power supply.

Just two months previously, Chancellor Merkel had taken an unpopular decision to extend the life of ageing nuclear stations in Germany. But facing widespread public hostility to the energy source after Fukushima, she back-tracked.

Before the phase-out decision, Germany got 23% of its power from nuclear plants.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising