EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Oettinger backs new 2030 targets for CO2, renewables

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 02 November 2012

Günther Oettinger, the EU’s energy commissioner, greeted the launch of a new coalition promoting renewables and gas power with a call to set fixed emissions reductions and clean energy targets for 2030.

“I think we need a new CO2 emissions reduction target,” he told a conference in Brussels on 31 October, which marked the launch of a new alliance between companies involved in renewable energies and natural gas production.

The targets, Oettinger said, would be “maybe more than 20% or 30% in 2030.”  

“I [also] think we need a new binding target for renewables because if we just have a new binding target for CO2 emissions reductions [then] nuclear is better,” he added.

Nuclear power might be welcome, Oettinger said, “but we need a clear outlook for renewable energy, so more obligations, and maybe more coordinated and harmonised European support schemes, not just 28 different national support schemes.”

An internal European Commission debate about a communication on targets for 2030 is due to begin in six weeks time, with mixed messages emerging from the EU executive as to its potential contents.

Jasmin Battista, a member of Oettinger’s cabinet, told a meeting in October that the commissioner would only favour a combined target for renewables and emissions reductions. But such a package would lack support from member states.

A week before, Jos Delbeke, the European Commission’s director general for climate, told a separate conference in Brussels that there would be no such climate and energy package until 2015 at the earliest.

ETS reform

A separate proposal for increased emissions reductions targets may also be included in the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) reform proposals in November, drawn up by its climate department, as a jolt to the flat-lining carbon price.

Shell, one of the companies supporting the new gas and renewable energy alliance,  supports the removal of around 1 billion allowances from the ETS, and a carbon price floor in the ETS from 2020 onwards, both of which might help to encourage investment in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. 

But Dick Benschop, Shell's Netherlands Gas Markets vice president, said overlapping EU targets would interfere with the EU’s policy objectives. “For us, it’s absolutely clear that the key 2030 target is for CO2,” he told EurActiv. “That’s what is driving climate change.”

Shell has yet to formulate a precise position but Benschop indicated that the energy giant, which for the first time this year expects to produce more natural gas than oil, expects a target in a range between 30% and 40%.

Positions: 

“We support Commissioner Oettinger in his statement in favour of a 2030 target for renewable energy. We need this target legally binding and in our view a 45% renewable target would create long term policy-stability for the energy sector”, said Justin Wilkes, policy director of the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA).

Next steps: 
  • End of 2012: EU to begin discussion on 2030 targets
  • Nov. 2012: EU expected to publish carbon market reform proposals which may contain emissions reductions recommendations
  • 2014: Commissioner Oettinger has called for a decision on new EU climate targets by the end of this year
  • 2020: Deadline for Eu to meet its climate target for 20% improvements in carbon emissions, renewable energy and energy efficiency
Arthur Neslen

COMMENTS

  • Günther Oettinger makes a good case for a har,omised approach across the European Union and its affiliated Countries and that is very much welcomed. What seems to be happening though is the splintering of the debate through the mega-energy giants posturing that they should be allowed to produce mor and more carbon dioxide provided they are then subsidised to the hilt to build CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) facilities paid for by us the Tax Payers. So-called Natural Gas is a Fossil Fuel with a polluting base equal to that of oil - and in some sources higher. This is diverting attention away from making energy from truly sustainable sources (renewable as well) so that the combined use of all the fossil fuels is reduced. Giving Shell or BP €4 to 7 Billion for CCS schemes is a nonsense when there is ample evidence to show that all they are proposing to do is shunt the Carbon Dioxide into the oil and gas wells in order to extract more of those resources and so increase the quantity/life expectancy of these reserves beyond their current "anticipated" life. These companies already make huge amounts and it is their products (as well as coal and brown coal and peat) that is the cause of tjhe issue. Encourage these companies to work to find a way whereby the energy output per barrel of oil at final use is 30% more efficient in producing energy and you solve the issues at source. There are more efficient mechanisms to produce Renewable Fuels and Renewable Energies than those currently in fashion but in reality the Energy Companies are not following those paths. The one exception we see is Saudi Arabia which has made major statements in recent time to develop a Photo-Voltaic energy charge to produce all of its needs in terms of electrical power from that source. They have also taken the lead to look at the latest developments here that will (by using the latest spray-applied micro-thin pant-finish applied PV systems reduce the investment costs to less than a third of the current plate films and the CSP plants that are currently in use.

    CCS is a toy and not a reality.

    By :
    Gerry Murphy
    - Posted on :
    02/11/2012
  • Once again the European Wind Energy Association,(EWEA) a powerful lobby group dominated by German and Danish industry, works to shape EU, and hence national, energy policy. European citizens don't realise what is going on behind the scenes as "legally binding targets" for renewable energy (mostly wind) are set which will have negligible impact on global climate change but massive impact on our local environment . We only realise what is happening when EWEA members arrive on our doorstep to degrade our landscapes and coastlines with vast, expensive wind farms authorised by "targets" incorporated into National Renewable Energy Action Plans, drawn up at EU insistence , without any democratic input in contravention of the UN's Aarhus Convention. It is noteworthy that increasing numbers of EU citizens and indeed their politicians are acquainting themselves with the facts about wind energy . They are increasingly mounting protests to protect local landscapes and wildlife against powerful EWEA members and the legally binding targets set by Commissioner Oettinger at their insitigation. The unqualified backing of the EU for large scale wind energy will be seen in years to come as a costly mistake, undermining EU economic recovery and degrading our natural heritage.

    By :
    James D
    - Posted on :
    05/11/2012
Background: 

The EU has set a legally binding goal to reduce its emissions by 20% from 1990 levels by 2020. Moreover, it has pledged to raise this to 30% if other countries make comparable commitments.

The EU agreed a new Renewable Energies Directive in December 2008, which turns into law its binding target to source 20% of the bloc's energy from renewable sources by 2020.

In October 2009, EU leaders endorsed a long-term target of reducing collective developed country emissions by 80-95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. This is in line with the recommendations of the UN's scientific arm - the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - for preventing catastrophic changes to the Earth's climate.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising