EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Poland keeps vetoing its own future

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 15 March 2012, updated 19 March 2012

By stubbornly rejecting the EU’s shared vision to move towards a green energy future, Poland is vetoing modernisation of its own economy and further isolating itself, argues Julia Michalak from Climate Action Network Europe.

Julia Michalak is a policy officer specialising in EU climate policy in Central and Eastern Europe at Climate Action Network Europe.

"It didn’t come as a surprise that Poland used another veto at the last environment ministers meeting on 9 March. This time around it couldn’t accept the milestones for cost-effective emission reductions by 2050. In June 2011 it rejected the Council conclusions because of the call for a 25% green house gas (GHG) emissions cuts by 2020. Currently the primary goal of the Polish government seems to be blocking the EU’s climate agenda and vetoing all climate targets, regardless of the timeline or level of ambition.

From the beginning of Poland’s membership of the EU in 2004, one of Donald Tusk’s main goals was to avoid a two-speed Europe. This rhetoric completely vanished when Poland went against the entire EU as 26 countries endorsed the EU’s plan for emission reductions by 2050. It was bad news for Europe but even worse news for Poland. Failing to modernise an outmoded energy system because of the lack of incentives for green investments is now a real prospect for Poland. It’s also bad news for Polish society.

Contrary to what Polish officials are claiming, a recent survey from the Institute for Sustainable Development shows that Poles support more climate efforts. The number of citizens supporting renewable energy is constantly growing and majority of Poles would like the government to invest in green economic development. Recent Eurobarometer polls show almost 70% of Polish society believes that fighting climate change and using energy more efficiently can boost the economy and stimulate job growth in the EU.

Warsaw’s distrust in the climate debate is derived from a deeply rooted historical legacy of suspicion. Polish vetoes are reminiscent of the 17th-century liberum veto, a tool allowing any attendee of Parliament to terminate a Parliamentary session in the case of no unanimous consent (which ultimately contributed to the twilight of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth).

The general belief that the golden rule of foreign policy is “if you need a helping hand, it's at the end of your arm” is evident in the current political debates. Today, when discussing the challenge of climate change, politicians in Warsaw are saying that the Polish coal-based economy is under ruthless attack. The main goal of EU’s climate policy, they claim, is to create a market for the Danish and German renewable technologies and Poland is the only one bravely going against EU’s madness about reducing emissions. But this rhetoric of distrust and merely looking backward, are ill advised in a united Europe.

To modernise the power sector, create attractive green jobs and enhance the country’s energy security, the Polish government has to go beyond the myths standing behind their suspicion of the EU’s green future. What Poland needs is not another veto, but a vision of how to overcome its coal dependency. Only then can it build up a competitive and strong green economy of the future. There is enough Polish wind, enough Polish potential for energy savings and enough Polish skilled hands to make it happen."

COMMENTS

  • EU and other western countries hide behind their reduction of CO2, the truth is that the technology involved behind these reductions looks clean as the final product but their production on the other hand is a significant cause for the increased levels of CO2 being produced, toxins released into the environment and land destruction. The EU, US, and Japan have this week actually gone to the World Trade Organization this week to Sue China into eliminating its restrictions on exports of rare earth metals. China supplies 95% of the world demand! China says the restrictions are in place to limit the environmental devastation. The US in California has rare earth deposits but they refuse to mine them because its too environmentally destructive. So they force China to do it. Then blame them for CO2 emissions. Its hypocrisy at its best. The entire world gets China to produce their products then wash their hands of the guilt associated with mining, and refining of metals. These rare metals are used in modern batteries, and every electronic device in production today. Did i also mention magnets. With out these components there is no wind power, solar power, nuclear power.

    Poland as a developing nation has made a huge effort to curb carbon dioxide emissions, cutting them from 465 million tons in 1990 to 377 million in 2009. We would easily meet the EU goal of curbing emissions by 20 percent from 1990 levels by 2020. As a whole the 27-EU nations produce 10.9% of the worlds co2 emissions in 2008 while China produced 21%. Poland produced 0.9% of the world total in 2008.

    Looking at China, their 1990 levels were 3770.5 million. In 2008 they rose to 9916 million. China being the largest producer of CO2 in the world and having increased their CO2 production by 263% in 2008 since 1990 levels makes Polands refusal to sacrifice its industry for a slight decrease in emissions unreasonable.

    Countries like Germany that are pushing for higher standards are also the key producers of renewable energy technology. So this also contributes as for them its an economic gain.

    Then again looking at all those stats we must consider yet more stats. Are we being fair comparing China's emissions to those of Poland, Eu or even US. Not necessarily when you consider the differences in population and shear size. I think its worth looking at the CO2 emissions per person, aka per capita. The US rants 10th, Canada 11th, Russia 18th, Germany 27th, Poland is tied with the 27-EU nations at 39th place. So were is China. Well its down at 57 place. right after France and Switzerland. Meaning that the Chinese are producing less emissions than the majority of the so called green countries.

    I have always disagreed with the idea of reductions associated with past historical emissions for a given country. This mechanism ensures continued economic supremacy of those who have dominated historically. We should be looking at the Per Capita emissions. The countries that in the past have sacrificed environmental considerations should now be held to stricter standards. also the amount of CO2 production nationally should be redistributed outwardly based on who consumes the products they produce. Because Oil producers should not be the ones paying the price of the pollution being caused. they should be paid by the consumers who use it.

    By :
    adam
    - Posted on :
    16/03/2012
  • Did you know, that Poland has already reduced its CO2 emission 45% since 1989? And how much did France or Germany reduced? They have even increased...

    Please also check the fact that never ever anyone has proved that CO2 emited by human has ANY impact on environment. One volcano erruption has produce more gases than entire humanity within 100 years. What else, taxing industry for emiting CO2 will DESTROY European growth, because production will be FARE MORE expensive than e.g in China or in India - they for sure ARE NOT GOING TO REDUCE CO2 emisssion. So lowering emission in Europe will have no influence in decreasing CO2 emission in the world (there are other 5 continents which are not going to tax extra their industries and destroy economic growth)

    So basicly: Please dont tell me that taxing industry for using air means "modernisation" - Julia Michalak dont have any idea about economy. Thank you for reading.

    [ Most of EU policy are simple rubbish]

    By :
    Student
    - Posted on :
    20/03/2012
  • It's true that the Polish economy's 1989 transition from communism to a free market economy resulted in a significant drop in emissions. But this decrease had nothing to do with any climate agenda, as it was the case for all post-communist, future EU Member States. The emissions reductions were reached thanks to the collapse of heavy industry, not because of laws or regulations aiming to cut greenhouse gases. The Polish energy mix has remained the same for the past 20 years, so there is clearly still huge room for improvement.

    By :
    Vanessa
    - Posted on :
    21/03/2012

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising