EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Report: Europe could halve its greenhouse gas emissions by 2030

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 13 February 2013

EXCLUSIVE / By 2030, Europe could be generating more than 40% of its energy from renewables, using 38% less energy than in 2005 and emitting 50% less greenhouse gases than it did in 1990, a new WWF report shows. 

“Achieving such levels would put the EU on track to deliver a 100% renewably powered energy system by 2050 at the latest,” says the report, Re-energising Europe, prepared for WWF by the Ecofys consultancy.

The European Commission will soon begin an orientation debate about 2030 climate targets, in advance of a public consultation (Green Paper) later this spring and a follow-up policy paper (Communication) due by the end of the year.

But Jason Anderson, WWF’s head of EU climate and energy policy, said that such measures were unlikely to be successful in the absence of legal recourse.

“Time and again, indicative targets and voluntary agreements have failed and been replaced by binding targets,” he told EurActiv.

“The energy-savings target is non-binding and on course to be missed,” he added, “so let's start from the realisation that within the arsenal of policy measures the EU has, binding targets are useful.”

Applied globally, a ‘sustainable energy for all’ policy could also generate enormous cost savings by mid-century, Anderson said. “Achieving full access to energy worldwide using only renewable energy by 2050 would save $4 trillion by cutting fossil and nuclear energy costs.”

However, economists and academics have questioned whether universal energy access could ever be provided for the 1.3 billion people currently lacking it without raising CO2 emissions.

The modelling in the new report is extrapolated from a 2011 global study which found that limiting energy use in absolute terms was a crucial first step towards decarbonisation, followed by a scaling up of renewable generation technologies.

Energy savings

In the new paper, European energy savings are broken down by sector, with industry consuming 31% less energy, buildings making a 26% saving, and transport energy consumption falling by 11%, all by 2030.

The methods involved in the reductions would differ by sector. Transport emissions would be cut by fuel economy measures, improved air traffic management, and greater vehicle electrification and use of hybrids.

In industry, a 60-70% reduction in the intensity levels on 2000 levels would be achieved through increased recycling, stringent and ongoing ‘best available technology’ guidelines, and ambitious plant refurbishments.   

By contrast, with buildings, a 2.5% annual retrofit is proposed, along with increased heat recovery, insulation and ventilation systems, heat pumps, solar thermal systems and local renewable solutions where possible.  

Anderson said that countries such as Poland were making efforts on energy efficiency and it was thus “a bit perverse” that they were unenthusiastic about reducing CO2 emissions and improvements in the Emissions Trading System.

“With more ambition on greenhouse gas cuts for 2020 and beyond, supported by targets including a binding efficiency target, not only would countries like Poland see the benefit of reduced inefficiency, they could attract investment and use income for further measures,” he said.

'100% Renewable energy by 2050'

By 2030, the Ecofys report also projects that 65% of Europe’s electricity, 35% of its heat and 29% of its fuels could be powered by renewables. In total, this would power 41% of Europe’s energy needs.  

“These results represent a scenario result in which the final goal is 100% renewable energy by 2050,” says the report, which breaks down renewable energies into the same sectors as those for energy savings.

An apparently incongruous finding that electricity grids will not be able to accept an annual renewable electricity share above 45% – but still make up 65% of total electricity – is explained by a massive expansion of hydro-powered geothermal energy, concentrated solar power and bioenergy, according to the report's authors.

But the Ecofys scenario is careful to ascribe stringent sustainability criteria to bioenergy, which the EU currently counted as carbon neutral, despite increasing evidence that this may not be the case. Any expansion in its use could require a much larger biomass industry.

The model also assumes a phase-out of nuclear energy by 2040-2050, and no substantial deployment of carbon capture technologies by 2030.

Gas: An 'essential' balancer

Industry sceptics contend that increased renewable power generation risks power outages, without sufficient storage or backup for times when the sun is not shining, nor the wind blowing.

Anderson told EurActiv that gas “will be essential for balancing variable supply for the coming decades, certainly, but with reduced operating hours.”

But as a high-carbon energy source with a finite use, the utmost caution would be needed when using its unconventional gases, such as shale, he added.   

“The problem with including shale gas is that this simply unlocks another huge pool of carbon we can't possibly expect to burn and stay within safe limits to global warming,” he explained.

“As the IEA has said, most carbon is unburnable. So which bits get used and which don't?”

Next steps: 
  • April 2013: Green Paper on 2030 targets expected
  • By end of 2013: Communication on 2030 targets expected
  • 2014: Review of progress towards meeting the 2020 energy efficiency target
  • 2020: Deadline for EU states to meet target for 20% improvements in energy efficiency, renewables and CO2 emissions
Arthur Neslen

COMMENTS

  • Another USA report for Europe. That puts it to 126 USA-financed reports on CO2 measures for Europe since 2008.

    By :
    Bedford
    - Posted on :
    13/02/2013
  • I have sais this all along in my Consultancy here in Italy so it is nothing new to the commentator before me.

    Importantly there are various sectors of the "loosely phrased" energy market that can be seriously targeted which would have a dramatic effect without inducing inflation.

    Take for example producing Renewable Fuels for Transport. It has been consistently reported in this forum (and in various others) and I have reported it also that we can produce over 50% of our transport fuels with Renewable Fuels by employing waste and importantly using Biomass found in these Waste areas including Municipal Solid Waste, Agricultural and Farming Waste, Industry and Commerce Waste, Food and Drinks Production, and from Waste Water Sludge, Animal Manures and others and it is there for the taking.

    I have recently read an authorative paper presented in the EU where it is reasonably stated that if we in the EU were to pool our efforts together and take these sources of Biomass and use a simple transformative process to make the Renewable Fuels (Biofuela) as Ethanol or Butanol then by using this simple procedure which is called Weak Acid Hydrolisis which incorporates an innovative piece of Engineering which makes it continuous, that by using all of these sources of Waste we could reduce the total use of Oil in the EU by such a margin that we could reduce oil use by 40% overall. This is a serious issue for in this thesis the issue is further heightened by the fact that it would produce these Biofuels in such quantities and at such investment (capital) costs that to build these Biofuel Plants would cost 25% of incineration plants used for Municipal Solid Waste and in the production process the sales value accorded to the quantities of Biofuels produced as Ethanol and/or Butanol would pay for the building of these plants within 4 to 5 years and that they would not need to over-charge treatment fees/costs to treat these wastes and would as aresult happily work at €30-00 per tonne during this initial 5 year period thereafter dispense with the treatment costs altogether.

    Buit euqlly important this Biofuels production procedure would be producing Renewable Fuels which would reduce Road Transport Fuel Costs to the General Public dramatically and in the example proposed which I have seen would sell at €1 per litre - a sum which would still give the EU Member States their fair share of fuel revenues comparable with those obtained from Oil. Imagine the public getting this degree of benefit by turning back the clocks 6 years to the comparative days when the fuel prices were that low.

    It is reported from various sources that this issue is of such a strategic benefit that the Governments of six of the EU will be raising this within the EU within the next month as it needs a stimulus package to help this through.

    Put this together in perspective, when we can produce over 50% of our Road Transport Fuel by Renewable Fuels made from Waste (including Municipal Solid Waste) this would make us much more less-reliant upoon oil and it would stimulate the economies of the EU at a stroke. This is not a pie-in-the-sky technology but real and it is here now. It is ready and waiting to go in Malta in Holland in the Uk (Northern Ireland and Yorkshire and Scotland) as well as in Italy, Greece, Israel and elsewhere with major facilities ready and waiting.

    EU if you do not believe this then think again for we can alert you to the precise locations if you wish and I recommend that the EU must seriously now consider allowing the EIB to invest in these projects as loan guarantee portfolios.

    By :
    Victoria
    - Posted on :
    13/02/2013
  • Well said in this report.

    We must not forget that the greatest impact is in the Biofuels though. The projects I have been on about over the past few years which has also commented upon here by Victoria in Malta and Holland and the UK are a must for rapid progression. This adds to the facts that we must only make our Biofuels from Non-Food Sources of Biomass. The Malta project was to make Ethanol but I am led to believe will now make Butanol for use is I understand awaiting start. The Dutch project is already starting. The UK projects in Northern Ireland and elsewhere were targeted for an early start but are still awaiting funding closure. Here-again the idea that making Ethanol was the original premise of the manufacturing is fraught with problems because the major Oil Companies and the major Blenders have tied up the market so much that Ethanol has a no sale benefit. They control the market so much that these companies are ruining the business. Butanol however can be sold directly to end-users and the smaller refiners.

    I for one would like to see cheaper fuels at the pumps and a €1-00 per litre here in Greece would certainly help the Greek Economy as much as I am also sure it would help others.

    By :
    Carol
    - Posted on :
    13/02/2013
  • YES to european Biofuel and waste-to-energy tech! NO to USA-financed reports, paid-for experts and phoney NGOs!

    By :
    Bedford
    - Posted on :
    14/02/2013
  • WWF cannot credibly claim to be an environmental NGO when they are apparently condoning massive offshore wind development in Uks sensitive near shore areas. . Our seas are already under threat from global warming and climate change. Protection not industrial development is what we need !

    By :
    James Doyle
    - Posted on :
    14/02/2013
  • By 2030, Europe could be generating more than 40% of its energy from renewables. An algal production facility located at the CCRES Research Farm will be operational by June. This is the first facility at Croatia that can produce large amounts of algal biomass.

    The facility is a 800 square-foot greenhouse that will accommodate two raceway pond systems, four large flat panel photobioreactors and one custom-made revolving attachment-based photobioreactor. The total production capacity will be 100-200 dried kilograms of algae biomass per year.

    CCRES Researchers will use the various production systems to quickly grow algal biomass for various research purposes including the production of renewable fuels, food or animal feed. “This greenhouse algal production system will be a test bed for different researchers to try out their algal production capability at a large scale,” said Zeljko Serdar, President of CCRES ALGAE TEAM.

    “The raceway pond systems are each 20 feet in length and both systems can hold approximately 1,000 liters of algae culture medium. Raceway pond systems are the most common method for large-scale algae cultivation. At first glance, the four flat panel photobioreactors appear to be large tanks,” said Ilam Shuhani, Chairman of the CCRES Supervisory Board and professor-in-charge of the greenhouse.

    By :
    CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
    - Posted on :
    15/02/2013
  • Algae are the fastest growing plant organisms in nature and have the ability to convert large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) into oxygen.

    Before algae evolved, the earth’s atmosphere had no oxygen but instead consisted of carbon dioxide and methane. Photosynthetic algae converted carbon dioxide into biomass and released oxygen into the atmosphere. Today, algae still produce 70% of the earth’s oxygen.

    Algae also form the base of the aquatic food chain. They produce carbohydrates, oils, protein, vitamins and organic minerals. Since they are aquatic, algae grow much faster than land plants as they do not have to expend energy growing roots and cellulose support structures like trunks, leaves and stems. Without the need for support structures, algae can triple or quadruple their biomass every day. This rapid growth means that one acre of algae can produce the same amount of protein in a year as 21 acres of soybeans or 49 acres of corn.

    The Biodiversity of Algae

    Algae are extremely diverse. Many species are single-celled microorganisms but some are multi-celled. Most species are photosynthetic like plants, others consume organic carbon compounds like sugars and starches. They are also chemically diverse with some strains high in protein, oil and carbohydrates.

    Algae’s biodiversity means that they have many potential uses. Algae are used in food, animal feed, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and biofuels. They can also be used for carbon sequestration and bioremediation of waste and waste water.

    CCRES Algae Production Facility

    Algae production starts with inoculation of a flask in the lab. A dense culture of algae cells is grown in the flask and then transferred to a seed fermentor. A dense cell culture is grown again and then transferred to a larger seed fermentor.

    When the algae are ready to be harvested, they are transferred to the centrifuges to remove most of the growth solution and then to the spray dryers where they are turned into powder.

    CCRES Algae is an impressive production facility but its value as a research facility may be even more important. It is equipped with a fully functional pilot plant.This system allows our research and quality teams to experiment with new strains and production methods before rolling them out for commercial production.

    By :
    CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
    - Posted on :
    15/02/2013
  • Very helpful summary of the report.
    However, I noticed that the WWF's report doesn't say there will be a 60-70% reduction in the intensity levels in industry. On page 13 the report only says "indusrties have intensity levels that are 60% to 70% of levels measured in 2000". In turn this means there could be only a reduction of 30 to 40%.

    Maybe you add that to the article.

    By :
    Fabian Ritters
    - Posted on :
    27/02/2013
  • The Malta Biofuels Project which is about to start construction will be the first of a series of new-breed projects making biofuels from biomass from waste. It will be followed again in Malta by another supported from Macro-Algae grown in lagoons on land in deserts, and this is going to be followed by a further ten such projects in the UK (Yorkshire Northern Ireland Scotland) Ireland Holland (Hardenbeg and Zwolle) Italy (in Sardinia and Sicily as well as the mainland) in Greece in Turkey in Israel and further projects elsewhere. This is a major development using the Genesyst process that is aslo being followed extensively in Eastern and SE Asia and to the Africas.
    Yes it can be done.

    By :
    Karel
    - Posted on :
    06/03/2013
  • There is no doubt that we can reduce the total Green House Gas emissions by 2050, for that Target is easily achievable. It should have been set higher at some thing like 70% though as achievable targets are always achieved

    The comments made about elevating the necessary elements in Renewable Energy and Fuels to maximise this effort are though meaningless without a Real PLan that can be backed with enforceable Legislation and the Carrot and Stick approach to Reward and Penalise the issues.

    So there are some ideas which we have been mulling around for some time which really ought to have been done before.

    1] Wind Turbines sited off-shore.
    The EU must insist to each member state that these structures must be also used to affix Sea Turbines between those that are in the deeper waters. The reason for this is obvious the electrical infrastructure is already there and the attachment of water turbines betwen these to capture tidal and sea depth changes is a relatively simple and inexpensive option.

    2] Adopt and Use the more efficiently designed Wind Turbines we now see being developed.
    The existing Wind Turbine manufacturers have had it too good for too long. These are hugely expensive and exceedingly inefficient. They are unecessarily subsidised to the hilt, and because of that are depriving innovation.
    The EU and its member states and its affiliates in the MEDA/MENA/EFTA areas alrteady know that the new breed of Wind Turbines are more than twice as efficient than those using bladed technologies. These new ones are alrteady recording "operational efficiencies" of over 65% (compared to the current blade varieties) and they do not create the same hazards. We suggest that the EU might be advised to support this development and we in our bit will respond also.

    3] And talking about Sea Turbines..let's really go for it around the NW Coastal Areas of Europe. Anywhere from the Straits of Europe (Ginraltar if you like) up past Portugal the Bay of Biscay around the British isles across the Baltic to the Coasts of Norway and Iceland the power available is immense.
    Stop talking Actions please. This would provide Thousands of New Green Jobs...and they would be of the Ship-Building Stle.

    4] The current manufacturers of Photo_Voltaic Cellular Technology have had it good for too long. These are unecessarily expensive and are also subsidised to the hilt. These are also depriving innovation.
    The EU and its member States and its affiltes already know that there is a SRAY-APPLICATION FOR PHOTO_voltaic systems available now which when applied will cost barely 20% of the current systems and that as they are of equal - if not better - efficiencies would be measurably more successful as these can be applied directly as retrofitted Photo_Voltaic Systems to all and every building structure and the likes and would also be a protective paint finish. Come on everyone, imagine painting the Eiffel Tower the Bundestaag the Forth Road Bridge the Acropilis or Barajas Airport or a Reservoir a Dam a Road Cutting the Corinth Canal walls with this material! Look at the benefits...80% cheaper than current Photo_Voltaic Systems.

    5] Thermal and Hydro-electric Power Imported from Iceland.
    This delivered to the mainland of Europe via the UK would eliminate the needs of any Nuclear Power Station build in the UK and also supply over 50% of the electricity needs of Germany Poland and Spain and Portugal in one! It has been talked about for so long that it makes you wonder what the issue is. €40 to 50 Billion spent wiseley instead of Carbon Capture and Storage. There is no competition.

    6] Hydro-Electric we all know about

    7] Hot Rocks same.

    What about the New Fuels.

    8] Biofuels from Waste -- already discussed before. Malta looks as though it will be generating 50 to 75% of all its road transport fuels from biomass within 4 years.
    What about the other Countries?

    Biofuels from Macro-algae -- already a connsideration from those grown at Sea, but wait a moment -- the most recent development now proven beyond doubt is to grow these in on-land shallow lagoons in desert regions near the sea or fed with brackish water and injected with CO2. These can produce up to 30 times as much biofuels per hectare equivalent than growing sugar cane and they do not use food crop growing lands. And they can use the effluents from power statioins as well as the CO2 from existing power stations oil refineries and steel mills and the like. in this manner by 2035 we could produce 75% of all the road transportation fuels and an equal quantity of air transport fuels by 2030.
    Let there be no doubt, this is simple technology.
    So EU Go for it.

    By :
    Paul Hu
    - Posted on :
    09/03/2013
Background: 

EU leaders have signed up to a mandatory target to satisfy 20% of Europe's energy demand from renewable sources by 2020.

The EU-wide 20% target was later translated into individual targets for each member state, laid down in a new Renewables Directive, adopted in April 2009. Support schemes remain a national prerogative under the revised directive.

The Commission's last progress report, published in January 2011, called for investment in renewable energy to be doubled to  €70 billion to meet the EU's 2020 target. 

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising