EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Scientists link global warming to England’s rainiest year on record

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 04 January 2013, updated 07 January 2013

Senior climate scientists are linking global warming to the UK Met Office's announcement yesterday (3 January) that 2012 was England’s rainiest year since records began. 

The weather service's numbers showed that due to slightly more seasonal figures in Wales and Scotland, the UK as a whole experienced its second wettest summer recorded.

But four of the UK’s Top Five wettest years have now occurred since 2000, a statistic in line with the expectations of climatologists who model the effects of a warming world.

“It is not just Britain but many other parts of northern Europe and north America that are getting wetter and there is a climate change component to it,” Kevin Trenberth told EurActiv over a phone line from the US National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado.

Trenberth has won several awards for his scientific research, including the Nobel Peace Prize which he was co-awarded in 2007 for his work as lead author on the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s fourth risk assessment report.

“The overall pattern has been that middle to high latitudes [have] an increase in precipitation that goes with a warming climate, and the fact that the air can hold more moisture so the hydrological cycle speeds up,” he said.

Increased moisture in the air can also fuel super storms like Hurricane Sandy, in the view of Trenberth and many other scientists, even if such effects can be difficult to predict. 

“A global intensification of intense rainfall events is a very robust expectation with climate change,” said Gabriele Hegerl, an expert in the influence of climate change on precipitation at Edinburgh University.  

Hegerl, who is also an IPCC author, told EurActiv that the phenomenon had already been observed on a global basis.

Although there was some uncertainty about the increased variability in downpours and floods, recorded increases in heavy precipitation “can be attributed to greenhouse gases and anthropomorphic climate change,” she said.

8,000 homes and businesses flooded

According to the Met Office’s figures, at least 8,000 British homes and businesses were flooded in 2012, a year which saw 1337.3 mm of rain overall, just 6.6 mm shy of the record set in 2000.

The Met Office said that its preliminary research suggested that the character of this rainfall was changing too, with severe downpours becoming more frequent over time.

“The trend towards more extreme rainfall events is one we are seeing around the world, in countries such as India and China, and now potentially here in the UK,” said Professor Julia Slingo, the chief scientist at the Met Office.

“Much more research is needed to understand more about the causes and potential implications,” she added. In the 30-year periods between 1961-1990 and 1981-2010, annual UK rainfall increased by around 5%. 

Climate modeling suggests that this trend will increase across the planet, although rainfall levels will vary widely.

Sudden and severe downpours

Greenhouse gases can stabilise the atmosphere as well as warming and moistening it, leading to more sudden and severe downpours from clouds heavy with water.

“If you draw a line around the globe starting with the UK, this whole region is expected to become wetter,” Hegerl said, “the wet regions become wetter and the dry regions drier.”

“We’re foreseeing a range of changes that will make the Mediterranean particularly vulnerable to becoming more dry,” she added.

As well as Europe’s dry region moving north, when the North Atlantic Oscillation – which brings rain to Scandinavia and northern Europe – is high, winter storm systems tend to move into northern Europe and not the Mediterranean.   

Yet despite the increasing evidence of changing and often extreme weather patterns, scientists say they are increasingly concerned at a lack of urgency among policy makers in tackling the problem. 

“It seems like the policy has been to grin and bear it and suffer the consequences,” Trenberth said. “Certainly there is no planning to mitigate these events and reduce the odds of their happening again in the future.”

“It is very disappointing and extremely short-sighted,” he said.  

Next steps: 
  • 2015: World leaders slated to agree on a globally binding deal to replace the Kyoto Protocol
  • 2020: New globally binding UNFCCC agreement expected to come into effect
Arthur Neslen

COMMENTS

  • I spoke to these "scientists" at the met office ... who aren't actually scientists but modellers. Yes, there is a single trend in all the global statistics that the heaviest rainfall in the heaviest rainstorms has increased ... but they agreed that could be down to changes in instrumentation.

    And they agreed that globally rainfall has not increased.

    Which really makes this a highly cynical bit of PR which would have equally produced the same nonsense about a dry year proclaiming it is the inevitable consequence of Mayan-type doomsday climate 0prophecies.

    By :
    Mike Haseler
    - Posted on :
    04/01/2013
  • Can you quote your source for claiming that Trenberth won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007?

    By :
    Agouts
    - Posted on :
    04/01/2013
  • Mike Haseler - one good source for increased global precipitation in the last century is the IPCC's 2007 risk assessment. See: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch9s9-5-4-2.html Agouts - one good source for Trenberth being co-awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his work as lead author of the IPCC's risk assesment reports is the Royal Meteorological Society's website. See: http://www.rmets.org/weather-and-climate/climate/energy-climate/dr-kevin-trenberth. Another is the Nobel Peace Prize website. See: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2007/.
    By :
    arthur
    - Posted on :
    04/01/2013
  • Unless you are in the debt-ridden higher academia-corporate aristocracy working for the new European imperialist movement, you simply have no interest in the propaganda of environmental taxation - climate fears or some other Club of Rome round table idealism. Many have an interest in averting people away from it in fact. A borderless - idealistic global economy and UN style governing body to own, moderate, regulate and control all of earth's resources because it decides it's the expert. Those that are needing the moderation, regulation and controls are the ones in charge of the EU debt abomination and those due to suffer from this absolute power can't vote and are witheld the conscice/ relevant detailed information. The collectivist nonsense from the EU has only created a reversal to the mindset of earth-community globalisation, international standards and laws. The best work done in communities in need are done by volunteers and I'm sure that will remain to be the case. Without a connect to the contextual local level and local/ community environmental controls it won't sell. High powered lobby groups targeting toxic trading regimes around a basis of human rights are welcomed. Guidance and flexibility from the suggestions discussed from the most influential think tanks is welcomed but anti-competitive oligarchal and new imperialist rule-setting is unlikely to be tolerated by the existing economic structure without true transparency and in a flexible democratic framework. Super powers, super corporations and super monopolies need a rational and reasonable reality check for the resulting disparity and more power needs to be taken back by the smaller communities suffering from the resulting lack of ownership of their own resources. Just a rant but am sick of the inertia carried by the global warming/ climate change - aid corruption and money laundering around NGOs. Audit everything before any new ideas materialise.

    By :
    Jeremy Allan
    - Posted on :
    07/01/2013
  • Agout - how about not being so lazy and typing his name and nobel prize into google? Or is that too difficult for you?

    Mike Haseler - define scientist? Just because someone uses a computer to test his hypothesis, doesn't make him any less of a scientist!

    By :
    Wensdazechyld
    - Posted on :
    10/01/2013
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Background: 

After the failure of a 2009 summit in Copenhagen to agree a worldwide accord, almost 200 nations have given themselves until 2015 to work out a global deal to cut greenhouse gas emissions that will enter into force in 2020.

Amid an economic slowdown, many countries at the last UN meeting on climate change in Qatar in December expressed reluctance to make quick shifts away from fossil fuels towards cleaner energies such as wind or solar power.

There is no global price on carbon, only regional markets - in a European Union trading system, for instance, where industrial emitters must pay off they exceed their CO2 quotas, 2013 prices are about €6.7 a tonne.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising