EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Study says EU moving too slowly on noise pollution

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 12 April 2012, updated 15 April 2013

Ambitious vehicle noise reduction proposals would enable eight million people to sleep soundly, cut noise annoyance by 39% and save €326 billion over 20 years, a Dutch research group says in a new report.

The cumulative effect, says the organisation that commissioned the report, is that “the benefits of cutting noise outweigh the costs by more than 30 times.”   

The European Parliament’s environment, transport and internal market committees are currently considering a draft EU regulation tightening automobile noise emission limits that was produced last December.

But the study by the TNO consultancy effectively argues that this does not go far enough, or fast enough. The study was commissioned by the Netherlands' environment ministry and the pressure group Transport and Environment (T&E),

“To speed up the benefits of noise reduction, you need bring forward the timetable for implementation,”  Nina Penshaw, a T&E spokeswoman, told EurActiv.

“You could ask industry to reach an overall noise reduction equivalent to taking half of today’s traffic off the road,” she said.

Health problem

Road traffic noise is Europe’s most ubiquitous environmental health problem, with more than 44% of the population – 210 million people – estimated to regularly suffer volumes above 55 decibels.

At this level, voices must be raised to become audible and medical risks increase correspondingly, according to the World Health Organization.

Traffic noise can raise blood pressure, increase stress hormone levels and trigger cardiovascular problems, hypertension and mental illness. It can also cause insomnia, poor work performance and annoyance.

One recent study by CE Delft found that 50,000 people died prematurely and 200,000 suffered from cardiovascular disease each year in the EU because of traffic noise.

Reducing noise levels would save €89 billion in health costs by 2030, shave €8 billion off insulation expenses and add €229 billion to the property values, the TNO report says.

In 2012, Brussels proposed legislation with milestones in 2014 and 2017 to reduce noise levels for new cars and vans by 4 decibels and for new lorries and buses by 3 decibels.

The aim is to reduce the amount of people ‘highly annoyed’ by noise pollution by a quarter. But the new standards would not affect older auto models and because the sale of non-compliant noisy vehicles would not be restricted until 2019, the legislation’s benefits may only be fully felt after 2030.

‘Five step plan’

As a result, a coalition including T&E, the European Environmental Bureau and Environment Alliance are taking up the TNO alternative proposal with a call to the European Commission to implement a five step plan by:

  • Bringing the proposed new legislation’s milestones forward to 2013 and 2015;
  • Introducing a new milestone in 2020 for a further 2 decibel noise cut;
  • Preventing vehicles from distorting noise tests by using ‘ultra-quiet tyres’;
  • Requiring vehicle manufacturers to provide consumers with noise information;
  • Enforcing stricter limits for peak noise levels at 90 decibels.

An EU spokeswoman told EurActiv that “the Commission has set the ball rolling towards the revision of the Noise Directive, and expects this to be concluded during the course of the current mandate.”

The European Parliament’s environment, transport and internal market committees are due to vote on the regulation this summer.

Next steps: 
  • Summer 2012: the European Parliament's environment, internal market and transport committees are due to vote on the proposed legislation to regulate sound levels of motor vehicles
EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • If the EU or Brussels wish to reduce Noise Pollution, it will be better to stop all the black economy in all the EU countries. The incomes has to be controled even to these workers. They avoid VAT and TAX, and spend their illegal earnings in under the table for protection!!!. I have an average of Euro 10 extra on medications per month due to the noise by these workers and dog barking. Now the music noise is also being kept very high, this is disturbing me. The Maltse parlalment has not yet PASSED this LAW in force. So Brussels is being taken for a ride. You either work that we are equal for enforce more ''FINES'' . Regards

    By :
    H Galea
    - Posted on :
    13/04/2012
  • The 5 steps are political.

    What engineering measures except er… ultra-quiet tyres do they propose?

    How would these measures impact fuel consumption?

    And last but not least, who paid for the report?

    By :
    Sam Lowry
    - Posted on :
    15/04/2012
  • Why should this be a centralized bureaucratic decision ? Why not leave the self regulation to the localities which feel a problem ? As Alan Greenspan said long ago : beneath every pile of regulations lies a gun .

    By :
    Bob Armstrong
    - Posted on :
    16/04/2012
  • @Sam Lowry: T&E (a federation of European environmental ngos) paid for the report, together with the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment. There are a number of engineering measures available on the engine, exhaust system, drive train, vehicle body as well as tyres - which will help reduce fuel consumption, CO2 and air pollution emissions as well.

    For more details, see transportenvironment.org/noise.

    @Bob Armstrong: At the moment it is local authorities (= taxpayers) who have to pay for noise walls (costing €millions per km), insulation, traffic diversion, etc, etc, whereas taking action on the vehicles themselves via noise standards is 100x more cost-effective.

    By :
    nrenshaw
    - Posted on :
    17/04/2012
Background: 

Noise above a volume threshold of 60 decibels affects not just the wellbeing but also the physical health of citizens, according to the European Environment Agency. The World Health Organisation described it as second only to air pollution as a public health hazard, and said that one million ‘healthy life years’ were lost each 12 months in Europe as a result of traffic-related noise.

Early EU noise regulations were based on internal market objectives. These were mainly focusing on setting harmonised noise limits for motor vehicles, household appliances and other noise-generating products. But as more information about the health impacts of noise emerged, more extensive measures were suggested.

In 2002 the EU adopted the Environmental Noise Directive setting out a community-based approach to the management and evaluation of ambient noise. On 1 June 2011, the Commission published its first implementation report on that directive and in December of that year, a proposal to regulate the sound level of motor vehicles.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising