EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Surprise carbon market 'backload' proposal on the cards

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 25 July 2012

The European Commission's proposal to fix the beleaguered Emissions Trading System (ETS) today (25 July) will include scenarios for ‘backloading’ a massive 400 million, 900 million, or 1.2 billion carbon allowances, EurActiv understands.

Little of substance had been expected to be announced in the proposal, aimed at raising the price of carbon, currently languishing at €7 a tonne, down from a high of €20 a tonne in 2008.

But sources say it will include three variable scenarios for the number of backloads, although  the final agreed number may be different.

This will then be introduced in phases over the next round of the ETS’s auctioning process, which begins in 2013.

“The Commission has successfully overcome internal hurdles and innovated formal processes to bring us to the verge of a backload around the right number,” said Sanjeev Kumar, a senior associate at the E3G environmental group.

The proposed backloads are expected to form part of a wide public consultation, which will then inform an ETS review. Hard legislative proposals will follow later on. 

The energy giant GDF Suez was said to have thrown its support behind the EU’s plans on the eve of the Commission's announcement.

Backloading

The EU’s cap-and-trade carbon market is massively over-supplied with carbon allowances due to generous free allocations, uncertainty over the future of EU climate funding, and the emissions-lowering effects of recession. 

As carbon prices have fallen, so has the ETS mechanism’s ability to incentivise low-carbon investments.

To give it a boost, the EU wants to ‘backload’ – or stagger – the numbers of carbon allowances released so that fewer are released initially and more later, when the economy may have picked up sufficiently to compensate for any price deflation this would cause.

But without details of the number of allowances that will be permanently removed from the system, some analysts fear that market jitters may continue.

Market analysts at Point Carbon estimate that the ETS currently contains 1.8 billion excess allowances. 

In this context, experts believe that even the removal of 800 million allowances may not raise the price of carbon much beyond €12 a tonne.

Bearish markets could test price floor

Earlier yesterday, analysts and observers of Europe’s €90 billion ETS expressed concerns about the carbon price plummeting if the EU’s proposals failed to reassure investors.

“If there is no long term plan to explain how this will unfold, I think the market is going to look for an excuse to react in a very bearish way,” one senior market observer told EurActiv. “They could test the price floor.”

The carbon price floor would effectively be zero, analysts say.

“If you move the market 12% in one day - the equivalent of 1500 points on the Dow -  you’re going to have a lot of people opening the window and jumping out,” the source said.

However, Stig Schjølset, the head of EU carbon analysis for Thomson Reuters Point Carbon, said that recent market tumbles – in response to rumours that the EU’s announcement would be delayed – had left little more room for the price to fall. 

“If anything I think there will be relief that the proposals are finally out and there will not necessarily be a huge market reaction,” he told EurActiv.

“The market will need some time to digest this before it is able to take a clear direction,” he added.  

Anticipated amendments

Financial sentiment may be lightened by some other aspects of the proposal that are expected to be outlined today. 

One anticipated amendment of the ETS directive would give the European Commission the authority to change the auctioning legislation to do this without fear of legal challenges stringing out the process. 

Another revision to the auctioning regulation will clarify that any action taken is intended to achieve an unspecified number of allowances being backloaded, over a certain time frame. 

The third part of the package, an annual ETS review containing policy options, which Climate Action Commissioner Connie Hedegaard announced in April, is now expected later this autumn.

Positions: 

"As an association we believe the strength of the EU's proposal will be in what it says about the long term structural reform process,"said Simone Ruiz, the EU policy director of the International Emissions Trading Association.

"We hope to see some substance. The report should outline a few options for a cap adjustment in the mid-term, for 2030 targets, and proposals to discuss extending the cap to other factors."

Next steps: 
  • July 25 2012: Results of ETS Review due to be announced
  • 2013: Third phase of EU ETS trading scheduled to begin, and continue until 2020
Arthur Neslen

COMMENTS

  • Once again, Euractiv has published a one-sided article on the EU’s climate policy, giving a voice only to those who are in favour of a set-aside or cancellation of allowances while the strong concerns of manufacturing industries, which represent the vast majority of companies and employment subject to the trading scheme, are given no opportunity to comment. Who would call this objective reporting?

    Gordon Moffat
    Director General
    EUROFER - The European Steel Association

    By :
    Gordon Moffat
    - Posted on :
    25/07/2012
  • I'd call Euractive reporting pretty objective. Certainly a useful counterbalance to the heavyweight loobying that industry sectors engage in.

    I note that at least one steel plant in Sheffield is going the district heating route in an effort to re-use energy that would otherwise go to waste. I’d suggest that the Euro steel industry could focus a bit more on getting its act together on energy efficiency and spend less time whining about ETS. Still, the former would require thought, investment and action. The latter is sooooo easy.

    In the case of manufacturing industry, it has at best a flabby response to energy efficiency action. A dual Franuhofer report from 2009 noted that without too much effort German manufacturing industry could reduce its electrical costs by 25%. But yeah - lets moan instead.

    And for the record, I worked at a Japanese TV manufacturing plant as the energy guy. Let me tell you, the Japanese can show the Euros a thing or two on energy efficiency - I had monthly "cost down" targets - I wonder how many Euro co's have the same?

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    25/07/2012
  • Back-loading and set-aside of allowances will not seriously affect heavy industries since they still possess huge piles of unused allowances from Phase II. The current oversupply of the ETS is largely due to a surplus of allowance being held back by industries, including steel. In addition, they will still be able to use these surplus permits after 2012 and will continue receiving free allowances after 2013. Short-term changes in ETS would not impact the amount of post-2012 free allowances for industry. Maybe that's why the steel industry is not mentioned in this article - because it will not be directly affected by the Commission’s back-loading proposal.

    Julia Michalak, Climate Action Network Europe

    By :
    Julia Michalak
    - Posted on :
    26/07/2012
  • Back-loading and set-aside of allowances will not seriously affect heavy industries since they still possess huge piles of unused allowances from Phase II. The current oversupply of the ETS is largely due to a surplus of allowance being held back by industries, including steel. In addition, they will still be able to use these surplus permits after 2012 and will continue receiving free allowances after 2013. Short-term changes in ETS would not impact the amount of post-2012 free allowances for industry. Maybe that's why the steel industry is not mentioned in this article - because it will not be directly affected by the Commission’s back-loading proposal.

    Julia Michalak, Climate Action Network Europe

    By :
    Julia Michalak
    - Posted on :
    26/07/2012
Background: 

With a turnover of some €90 billion in 2010, the EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the world's largest carbon market. Around 80% of it is traded in futures markets and 20% in spot markets.

The ETS aims to encourage companies to invest in low-polluting technologies by allocating or selling them allowances to cover their annual emissions. The most efficient companies can then sell unused allowances or bank them.

After a series of VAT "carousel" and "phishing" frauds in 2009, the European Commission proposed tighter security measures. But a number of member states declined to implement them because they said they could not afford to.

One Commission official pointed out that tens of thousands of euros spent on security could prevent millions of euros in losses.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Climate & Environment News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Climate & Environment Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising