EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Wind power buffeted by 'political uncertainty' but still growing

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 08 February 2013

Wind power accounted for over a quarter of all power capacity installed in the European Union last year, but turbulent times lie ahead, says a new report by the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA).

Some 11.6 gigawatts (GW) of wind capacity was hooked up in 2012, a 12% increase on the previous year, bringing Europe’s total wind capacity to 105.6 GW, according to EWEA’s annual 2012 statistics, published yesterday (7 February). 

The value of this investment could be as high as €17.2 billion, but the wind association sounded a warning about future prospects.

“The 2012 figures reflect orders made before the wave of political uncertainty that has swept across Europe since 2011, which is having a hugely negative impact on the wind energy sector,” said Christian Kjær, EWEA’s outgoing chief executive.

“We expect this instability to be far more apparent in 2013 and 2014 installation levels.”

Although wind accounted for 26% of new power builds in the EU, solar photovoltaic power made up 30% and gas 24% of the total.

In what may be a reflection of the strength of ‘NIMBY’ (‘not in my backyard’) arguments across the continent, offshore wind saw record growth in 2012, and the trend is predicted to continue to 2014. But onshore still represented 90% of all last year’s new installations.

Forecasting a “tough” year ahead, EWEA President Arthouros Zervos told the association’s conference in Vienna that sudden or retroactive changes to support schemes for wind energy were damaging the industry.

“The wind industry is suffering serious job losses, and will suffer more difficulties this year,” he said, adding that binding renewable targets for 2030 – EWEA favours a figure of 45% - would restore investor confidence.

Germany, the wind king

Germany remains the continent’s undisputed wind leader, the report shows, accounting for 21% of all new wind installations and 22% of existing capacity. Spain, the United Kingdom and Italy follow close behind.

But “it is expected that a number of large markets, such as Italy and Spain, and certain previously fast growing emerging markets, such as Bulgaria, may slow down significantly over the coming years,” the report says.

The budding clean energy industry is also facing a skills shortage of around 5,500 qualified staff per year.

“There is a real risk of a shortage of suitably skilled workers,” said Andrew Garrad, the chairman of GL Garrad Hassan, a renewable energy consultancy, singling out a particular shortfall of engineers in operations and maintenance.

Wind energy now powers 7% of Europe's electricity demand – up from 6.3% at the end of 2011 – and 15 member states now have more than 1GW of installed power.

Poland and Romania breeze their wind commitments

Newer states such as Poland and Romania both enjoyed record years, each contributing around 8% to the EU’s total spread. 

“Wind energy in Central and Eastern Europe, including Turkey, will substantially reduce the fossil fuel dependency of the power sectors,” Kjær said.

However, the continent is now almost 2GW behind its National Renewable Energy Action Plan forecasts, with 18 member states lagging – notably the Czech Republic, France, Greece, Hungary, Portugal and Slovakia.  

Europe’s long-term energy trend still leans in a low-carbon direction. Since 2000, 27.6% of all newly installed capacity has been wind power, 51.2% renewables, and 91.2% renewables and gas combined.

Just 7% of Europe’s new installations last year were coal-fired power plants. Over 69% were renewable.  

Next steps: 
  • Spring 2013: EU to publish Green Paper on 2030 targets
  • By end of 2013: EU to publish communication on 2030 targets
  • 2020: Deadline for renewable energy to make up 20% of the EU’s energy mix
Arthur Neslen

COMMENTS

  • Installed capacity figures are figments of imagination.
    Actual outputs are a mere fraction of what the proponents claim - and are often not available when most needed.
    The whole industry is a highly-subsidised scam on the taxpayers.

    By :
    Neville
    - Posted on :
    08/02/2013
  • Neville, very well said, you are absolutely correct. On top of the fact that all those windmills generate only half of what they are supposed to, they cost 2-4 times more to build than conventional power plants. Worse yet, emissions aren't really reduced because the coal-fired plants have to stay online so our lights don't go out when the wind stops blowing. The greenies don't tell us, but it takes days-not minutes, to start a large coal fired power plant. If they're down they aren't ready when the wind stops and then we are plunged into darkness. So, if operating windmills doesn't shutdown coal plants, how are emissions reduced? A giant, very expensive scam that not even Germany can afford forever.

    Read more in Kids Before Trees, get it at Smashwords or any online ebook store.

    By :
    Geoff Sander
    - Posted on :
    09/02/2013
  • Oh dear where to start.
    Neville: “Installed capacity figures are figments of imagination” – nope the name plate rating is often reached (I have half-hourly output figures from a number of wind farms). Capacity factors for on-shore are in the range 25% to 35% .
    “often not available when most needed” – when would that be Neville?
    “The whole industry is a highly-subsidised scam on the taxpayers.” Yep subsidised – nope not by taxpayers – by people that consume electricity.

    Geof Sanders: windmills mill things – which is why they are called “windmills”. Wind turbines tend not to be dual use (i.e. they generate electricity – rather than milling things). You seem confused between the two.

    Ditto with respect to the LCPD which is responsible for the closure of various coal stations. Favoured routes for power generation these days include CCGTs – which have somewhat higher efficiencies (55%++) than the coal stations. CCGTs also do not require days, they require at most hours – well within forecast errors for weather fronts (and thus wind strength).

    A business colleague once remarked that you should never educate idiots – so I’ll stop now.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    11/02/2013
  • Oh dear, Mike Parr, where to start: Insults! What a great idea! No use addressing the facts, insult the people you disagree with. Neville is right, wind "turbines" generate, on average, 50% or less of their nameplate capacity. Inexplicably, you disagree with Neville yet quote 25%-30% yourself? As for the "when", that refers to peak demand periods. You seem to be such an expert, I'm surprised you don't know about peak demand? Peak demand typically occurs in the morning and evening, during meal prep times. Electrical demand varies constantly, and you can't turn the wind on when you need more power. As for costs, if you think the "wind turbine" industry isn't subsidized by taxpayers, you'd better start to educate yourself before you start calling other people names!

    As for gas turbines, they burn natural gas, not coal, so shutting them in doesn't reduce CO2 emissions very much, does it? Or are you proposing that to backup the intermittent, unreliable power generated by "wind turbines", that already costs 4 times more than conventional power plants, we spend even more money to install an equivalent amount of gas turbine capacity for those days when the winds doesn't blow?

    Still up on your high horse Mike? You like looking on down on us regular people, don't you? Well, you sure educated me, now I know they're wind turbines, not wind mills, gee thanks. But they still cost way too much, and they don't reduce emissions very much. And since we're educating each other, my name is Geoff Sander, you try spelling that right next time, ok? Have a nice day Mike.

    By :
    Geoff Sander
    - Posted on :
    11/02/2013
Background: 

The EU has set itself a legally binding goal for 2020 of reducing its CO2 emissions by 20% and increasing the share of renewables in the energy mix by the same amount, both measured against 1990 levels.

A target of a 20% increase in energy efficiency has also been set but it is not legally enforceable. A low carbon roadmap in March 2011 outlined a plan for moving to a decarbonised economy by 2050.

This built on a long-term target first-endorsed by EU leaders in October 2009 for a long-term target of reducing CO2 emissions by 80-95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. This is in line with the recommendations of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for preventing catastrophic changes to the Earth's climate.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Supply Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising