EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU court strikes Berlusconi’s media empire

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 29 July 2011, updated 01 August 2011

The European Court of Justice confirmed yesterday (28 July) that the Italian switchover from analogue to digital TV has been illegally subsidised, favouring the channels of Italy's Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. A mammoth reimbursement is now due by his Mediaset media empire.

The decision is likely to cause a heavy financial blow to Berlusconi's TV group Mediaset which will now be forced to reimburse to the Italian authorities a huge amount of illegal state aid.

Between 2004 and 2005, the government led by Silvio Berlusconi spent around €220 million to encourage the purchase or rent of digital terrestrial decoders by Italian citizens (see 'Background'). Thanks to the government subsidies, in 2004 Italian families could buy terrestrial decoders with a €150 discount per piece. The following year, the discount was lowered to €70.

Millions of decoders were sold, creating a new market for terrestrial pay TV services. Until then, pay TV in Italy was confined to satellite and cable offers, a sector controlled by the Australian media mogul Rupert Murdoch through his company Sky Italia.

It may have looked as if the subsidy was justified by the need to help Italians switch to the new digital technology, as advised by the European Commission. However, the subsidy to digital terrestrial TV unfairly altered competition, as Brussels stated as early as 2007.

As has been often the case in recent Italian politics, the entire operation was soon denounced as favouring Berlusconi's financial interests. Indeed, Mediaset has been the private company which most profited from the subsidy scheme. It quickly launched new pay TV services ahead of any competitor and quickly enrolled most of the newly created market's new consumers.

Berlusconi's brother Paolo also gained from selling decoders through one of his companies, although maintaining a relatively low market share, at around 5%.

Even if other Italian TV stations benefited from the subsidy scheme, namely Rai, La 7 and Fastweb, Mediaset's gain has reportedly been the largest by far. In fact, only Mediaset appealed the Commission decision.

In June 2010, the EU Court rejected Mediaset's appeal and yesterday's ruling definitively concludes the procedure at EU level.

However, the exact amount that Mediaset will have to reimburse is to be set by the Italian authorities, which should calculate the advantage brought to each terrestrial TV station in Italy. Interest will also have to be paid.

Tycoons battle

The ruling comes as Berlusconi's Mediaset had just been forced to pay a heavy fine for a corruption case dating back to the early 90s.

Just a week ago, Mediaset paid €560 million of damages to CIR, a media holding which controls the leftist newspaper La Repubblica and the magazine L'Espresso, among others. CIR's head is Carlo De Benedetti, a key player in the Italian media landscape.

The payment of the fine concluded a two decade-long trial for which a close Berlusconi aid, Cesare Previti, has been condemned to a 11-year prison sentence for having corrupted a judge who favoured Berlusconi's Mediaset in the purchase of a top Italian publishing company, Mondadori. Berlusconi avoided the trial thanks to the statute of limitations, owing to the fact that too much time had passed between the events and the beginning of the trial.

Meanwhile, Mediaset is fighting another battle against the tycoon of tycoons, Rupert Murdoch, who is trying to take advantage of the developments to access the terrestrial TV market in Italy, from which he has so far been excluded.

A competition procedure is currently ongoing to sell the freed radio frequencies, with the Commission keeping an eye to the operation, which has exacerbated many suspicions of wrongdoings.

COMMENTS

  • Another blatant example of the EU interfering in domestic affairs. How long before the ECJ rules that the UK cannot give subsidises to old people and people with learning disabilities. Another ECJ ruling on TV coverage in the UK actually increased the price of Premier League football for British consumers. The EU is an expensive way of making us less free.
    By :
    Luke
    - Posted on :
    29/07/2011
  • You may perfectly disagree with the ECJ's decision, however saying that it makes us less free seems just stupid in my opinion. You menton this interference in domestic affairs as if it was an abuse of power, while on contrary it is the very purpose of the ECJ. It is the very purpose of EU. And this was agreed by Italy as every other member state, who nobody ever forced to enter. Are you actually considering that the state's courts are making people less free because they might rule against a decision of the government ? That is on contrary a guarantee. And the ECJ is of the same nature.
    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    29/07/2011
  • I totally agree with your point, this is the very purpose of the ECJ (and the EU)and I personally welcome its decision.
    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    29/07/2011
  • In this context, the role of the ECJ is to guarantee a free competition between service providers. The Court has ruled that the italian government has unduely subsidized Mediaset at the expense of other providers. Such a subsidy is likely to weaken their competitive position and to give a free ride to mediaset to impose higher prices to the general public. In this type of ruling, the ECJ does what national competition authorities should have done on their own initiative and leaves it to the the italian authorities to set the exact amount of illegal subsidies that must be reimbursed by Mediaset. Jean-Guy GIRAUD
    By :
    Jean-Guy GIRAUD
    - Posted on :
    30/07/2011
  • Tell me Luke baby - you don't read that adult comic the Daily Mail do you? because your post certainly reflects that "oh so special" mind set.
    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    31/07/2011
  • we welcome this decision. Lucia Italy
    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    01/08/2011
  • Alistair Campbell recently described the Daily Mail as "the worst of British values masquerading as the best". This poisonous brand of nat/pop whingeing makes gullible people believe that even corrupt officials need protecting if they represent the "national" rather than the "federal".

    By :
    graybiker
    - Posted on :
    25/08/2011
Background: 

The European Commission is pushing all EU countries towards the so-called switchover from analogue to digital terrestrial broadcasting by 2012. This is expected to favour a more efficient usage of radio frequencies allowing a new range of services to spring up.

In 2004 and 2005, Silvio Berlusconi's government allocated €220 million to subsidise the purchase of digital decoders by Italian households with the official aim to favour the migration from analogue to digital television.

In the process, Berlusconi's Mediaset was able to exploit the newly created market of terrestrial pay TV services, directly challenging the offers of Rupert Murdoch's Sky Italia satellite TV.

In 2007, the Commission rejected the operation as illegal state aid and required Italy to reimburse the funds, of which Mediaset has been the main beneficiary. The European Court of Justice confirmed this decision with a ruling issued in June 2010.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 3

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising