EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU threatens to punish Norway for breaching EEA agreement

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 30 January 2013

Norway is failing to live up to its obligations as a member of the European Economic Area (EEA), including imposing extra taxes on EU products and not implementing more than 400 directives, according to an EU report to be published later this year.

In the Commission draft report, which looks into the functioning of the EEA, the Scandinavian country is being criticised for imposing tariffs on EU products from 2013 and "resisted EU efforts for ambitious liberalisation" of the EU's single market.

According to the draft, obtained by EurActiv, 427 acts whose compliance date in the EU has expired, also remained to be incorporated in Norway by October 2012.

"This situation might thus lead to competitive advantages for operators based in the EEA-EFTA countries, and more fundamentally risks undermining the legal certainty and homogeneity of the single market," the report reads.

"This problem is of great concern for the EU side and should be solved as a matter of urgency," the report states.

'Selfish Norway'

Moreover, the EU also dislikes the fact that Norway has rejected several directives coming from Brussels. The Norwegian government has for example warned it won’t implement the EU’s postal directive about competitiveness for letter mail weighting less than 50 grams.

Danish MEP Bendt Bendtsen (European People's Party), who has been closely following the trade issues with Norway, told EurActiv the problems started in 2012 when Norway raised the price of hydrangeas from the EU by 72%.

Eventually, the extra taxes spread to EU food products such as cheese and meat.

Bendtsen said Norway is acting "selfishly" and that the taxes were put on EU goods "deliberately" as the Norwegian Centre Party, which is part of the Norwegian government, has for a long time pushed for the extra taxes.

"Norway only wants the cream on the cake," the MEP said.

Threaten with punishment

The EU’s foreign service and the Commission, which have the formal responsibility for the relationship with Norway through the EEA agreement, have confirmed that there is an increasing disapproval with Norway.

“This development worries us. We don’t like the backlog on implementing directives, and this is a case we are trying to deal with now," Maja Kocijancic, spokesperson of Catherine Ashton, the European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, told Norwegian TV2.

She confirmed that the EU is looking into the possibilities for sanctions within the EEA agreement's frame.

Leader of the pro-EU organisation Europabevegelsen Paal Frisvold said Norway risks exclusion from the European marine and cargo market and could lose cooperation on mobile roaming prices, making them more expensive in Norway.

However, Bendtsen said that the right EU punishment would be to hit Norway's fishing industry, or to take the step even further: "The consequence should be kicking Norway out of the EEA," the MEP said.

Stupid situation

Norway's Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg said the country has a good relationship with the EU, but the fact that there are disagreements over individual directives is nothing new.

Erna Solberg, leader of the biggest opposition party, the Conservatives, said the Norwegian government doesn’t understand the EEA’s mutual obligations. She said Norway isn't active enough when it comes to its Europe policy and doesn’t use the opportunities in effecting the EU legislation enough.

“It is stupid that we have put ourselves in a situation where our closest partners obviously are frustrated with us,” Solberg said.

Potential impact on British EU debate

Bendtsen said the problems in the EU-Norway relations could eventually affect the ongoing British debate on whether to stay in or leave the EU.

Norway has previously been mentioned as a positive example of a non-EU member which still gets advantages and benefits of being part of the EU's single market.

However, in his EU speech last Wednesday, British Prime Minister David Cameron asked whether it was in Britain's best interest and desirable for Britain to be like Norway or Switzerland – with access to the single market, but outside the EU.

"While Norway is part of the single market – and pays for the principle - it has no say at all in setting its rules: it just has to implement its directives," Cameron said. 

Next steps: 
  • End 2013: EU to publish review of the functioning of the European Economic Area.
Henriette Jacobsen

COMMENTS

  • for more details on the EEA an the possibilities of sanctions see this CEPS paper on Turkish pre-accession.

    download available at:
    http://ceps.eu/book/who-remembers-turkey%E2%80%99s-pre-accession

    By :
    Javolen
    - Posted on :
    30/01/2013
  • Maybe they can also "kick out" Britain??

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    30/01/2013
  • The EU and fishing! What a can of worms. Steal all the fish you can from 3rd World countries (all with legal treaties, of course) and then cry foul when former fishermen become pirates and migrant traffickers. Then complain about Norwegian fishermen! This is why the EU is hated by so many. The only thing the EU ever learned from Britain is hypocrisy.

    By :
    David Stephenson
    - Posted on :
    30/01/2013
  • You have to think that Cameron has some of the best brains in Britain advising him, so he can't be uttelry misled or stupid, can he? In which case, his comments about having to implemengt EU directives with no influence is plain bollocks. Just like the lies that Heath expounded. I have just read elsewhere that Norway has refused to or delayed implementing some 400 directives. And, by the way, it does have influence on EU legislation through the EEA as well as world bodies under the umbrella of the UN (food standards for example). These issues are researched, reviewed and debated globally and the EU (as well as member states)contribute to the debate. By the time the EU puts forward a proposed directive, it is merely implementing what has been agreed globally, not necessarily its own, discreet legislation.

    By :
    Don Latuske
    - Posted on :
    30/01/2013
  • Usually we stand up for the small guy taking on the bullying big guy. I hope that Norway tells the EU where to stick its 400 directives, and long may Barroso and his pals find it hard to sit down when the 400 directives have been duly stuck where they belong.

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    30/01/2013
  • The EU has done nothing for Norway nor EU industries. The EU ha liberalized all markets and for this reason it has undermined jobs and industry. EU Electricity directives have so far only led to higher and more volatile power prices and this has undermined power intensive industries and led to carbon leakage. Paradoxically, EU Com argued that liberalized power markets would lead to competition and reduced power prices but this has not come to pass nor will it. The EU has allowed for massive consolidation in the power industry and hence were back to a near cartel hegeony situation.

    The EU ETS Directive has ed to enormous windfalls to the utility industry while this industry has not recycled much anything back into new power plants with lower emissions. The EU then pushed another RES directive to force more power onto the market and hence end consumers in Europe ha scorss subsidized the utility industry twice. Furthermore, more private enities are noe in the market and are reaping huge profits for end consumers and pofits that n the past went back into communities and states coffers.

    The EU has pushed CCS wich is good thing but made CCS an improbable outcomes as no investor would want to invest in CCS as theyll have to contend with volatile allowance prices, volatile power prices which in turn have reaised CAPEX and discount rates sky high for such risky investments. EU Electricity and climate policies are counterproductive to green and CCS investments. Look to Canada and the US which has CCS projects and renewables investments with guaranteed returns as they did not liberalize their power markets. The few stats that did, haven't seen much of anything as fas as investments in new power generation is concerned. Did it dawn on the EU that a power producers makes more money of there is a shortage of power then surplus ?
    The meager CO2 compensation will be eaten up by tariff increases as they are now pushing for billion sin new interconectors between EU countries that will lead to many Twh of line losses and further invite derivative traders to an increasingly volatile power exchange. The EU invites expensive private capital into these interconnects wich, du to the inherent huge technical and economic risks, will further raise tariffs and power costs.

    The EU liberalized gas markets long ago but gas prices are high, so high in fact that coal plants are more profitable to run, even with allowance requirements. This in turn ha increased EU emissions whereas the US has lowered its emission without ETS to near 1990 by simply allowing for a decent supply into its gas markets. The EU wanted third part acces to gas pipelines and what happesn, no one want to build one. The EU responds with this failed policy to force interconnectors into Europe. A good thing but again the policies have perverse consequences.

    EU now pushes for privatization of the rail system and this will again just raise costs to end consumers as huge beheamoths, consolidated, will control most all rails systems and hence prices for maintanace, operations and the likes.

    The lists goes on but paradoxically, all efforts are seemingly done improve thinsg for EU citizens but so far i have seen little but increased costs and perverse effects.

    Norway and other countries should rightly wait to implement Directives until Directives are proven to improve the situation. As its stands,too many have increased costs, shifted money flows to private hands and done little to reduce prices for consumers or cut GHG emissions

    By :
    G Man
    - Posted on :
    31/01/2013
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Background: 

Norway is not a member of the EU, but closely associated with the Union via its membership in the European Economic Area (EEA), in the context of being a European Free Trade Association (EFTA) member.

After the Norwegian voters voted against an EU membership in 1994, Norway subsequently joined the EEA, along with Iceland and Liechtenstein. Iceland is now on course to join the EU.

Norway's trade is dominated by the EU and Norway is the EU's 4th most important import partner.

Norway to EU trade amounted to €91.85 billion in 2008, primarily energy supplies (only 14.1% is manufactured products). The EU's exports to Norway amounted to €43.58 billion, primarily manufactured products.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Innovation & Enterprise Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising