EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Hungary introduces 'fat tax' to boost nation's health

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 13 July 2011, updated 15 April 2013

Food considered to be unhealthy, including crisps, soft drinks and chocolate bars, are now subject to a new tax in Hungary. The new law, introduced on 11 July, is aimed at "improving the health of the nation".

Initially called 'the hamburger tax', the measure was dubbed 'crisps tax' or 'fat tax' after the Hungarian government decided that it would not affect fast food restaurants.

The plan is to impose a 10 forint (3.7 eurocent) levy on products that contain "too much" salt, sugar, or fat, while increasing the tax on liquor and soft drinks by 10%, according to the Global Post news website.

The proceeds, estimated to be worth up to 30 billion forint (111 million euro), would pay for state-funded health care, which has a deficit of about 100 billion forints (371 million euro). Hungary is among the most severely indebted countries in Eastern Europe.

The bill will be put to parliament this summer and in all likelihood will easily pass, said Gabor Csiba, the author of the bill, who is president of the Strategic Alliance for Hungarian Hospitals and a member of the ruling Fidesz party.

Fidesz has an absolute majority in parliament and was able to pass a series of controversial bills including a media law, a new constitution which is now being scrutinised by the Council of Europe, and a retroactive 'crisis' law which prompted European firms to file a complaint with the European Commission.

If Hungary does proceed with its 'fat tax', as seems likely, it would be the first country in the world to do so.

The US state of Washington levies a $0.02 tax on every bottle of soda. Romania had considered a more ambitious taxation scheme to raise 700 million euros a year, but shelved the idea in March, deciding that it would have been inappropriate at a time when food prices were rising dramatically.

In Romania, the average family spends nearly 40% of household income on food, almost seven times the share in the United States. Only 8% of Romanians are considered obese.

FoodDrinkEurope, a trade group representing the European food and drinks industry, says the proposed tax is "discriminatory" because it targets specific types of food and tends to hit low-income groups hardest.

It says such taxes are cumbersome to collect, economically damaging and have no proven potential to improve eating habits. Danish obesity rates, it says, have risen despite having a tax on candy since 1922.

According to DPA agency, Hungarians – heavy smokers and drinkers whose traditional diet is rich in pork, fat and salt – have one the lowest life expectancies in the European Union. However, the new law does not cover traditional Hungarian cuisine, like deep-fried goose fat.

COMMENTS

  • This is a fantastic idea, but is too watered down if it is not a blanket policy. It needs to include traditional cuisines, like deep-fried goose fat, and the fast food restaurants. I could only hope for such a policy here in America--we need it.
    By :
    Chicagoan
    - Posted on :
    13/07/2011
  • It is a pity that all have to be punished for those that eat in excess. I am sure that in Hungary, there are some slim people who still like to eat some chocolate and who need the salt because they take part in regular aerobic excerise. It would be much fairer, though probably considered highly un-PC, to get the height, weight and waist measurements of those visiting their doctors. In this way the obese could be separated from those who are normal, pregnant or who have a medical problem that causes excessive weight gain. The obese could then be given advice and three months to reduce their weight. If they did not achieve this, then they would have to pay an extra tax, or pay for their medical treatment in full i.e. if they were healthy, they would pay nothing extra, but if they required medical treatment for anything that could be attributed to their obesity then they would pay the full fees as if they were private patients. Besides, taxing chocolate would reduce sales and hurt the growers far more than the obese over-eaters. They would simply binge on whatever carbohydrate was at hand.
    By :
    Alison Tottenham
    - Posted on :
    14/07/2011
  • Alberto Alemanno highlighted us this forthcoming publication: Fat Taxes in the European Union between Fiscal Austerity and the Fight Against Obesity ABSTRACT: To discourage unhealthy eating and limit the population’s intake of fatty foods, an increasing number of countries across the the European Union is considering levying taxes on unhealthy food. This essay provides a brief analysis of the genesis, rationale and legal implications of these national ‘fat tax’ schemes by focusing in particular on the measures recently implemented in Denmark and Hungary. It focuses in particular on the legality of these product-specific taxes under EU and WTO law and explores whether the EU might validly consider to adopt a EU-wide fat tax in the light of the considerable geographic variation of obesity prevalence in the EU and its limited competence in both the health and tax areas. Those issues are particularly sensitive in the aftermath of the Political Declaration on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) adopted by the UN General Assembly on September 18, 2011. Alemanno, Alberto and Carreno, Ignacio, Fat Taxes in the European Union between Fiscal Austerity and the Fight Against Obesity (October 18, 2011). European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4/2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945804
    By :
    dominique
    - Posted on :
    21/10/2011
  • The paper is available for free download:
    http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945804

    By :
    Alberto Alemanno
    - Posted on :
    21/10/2011

Advertising