EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Germany's Eurovision debacle 'obviously political', commentators say

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 21 May 2013

Germans lamented their unexpectedly poor showing at the Eurovision Song Contest, blaming Chancellor Angela Merkel's tough stance in the eurozone crisis for their failure to win any points from 34 of the 39 countries voting.

Denmark's Emmelie de Forest won the event, watched by around 125 million people across Europe, with 281 points while German act Cascada was 21st out of 26 countries, getting just 18 points from Austria, Israel, Spain, Albania and Switzerland.

"There's obviously a political situation to keep in mind - I don't want to say 'this was 18 points for Angela Merkel'," said Germany's ARD TV network coordinator Thomas Schreiber. "But we all have to be aware that it wasn't just Cascada up there on stage [being judged] but all of Germany."

Merkel is popular in Germany for her firm position during the eurozone crisis. But she is loathed in parts of Europe for her insisting on painful austerity measures in countries such as Greece, Spain and Italy in exchange for rescue packages.

"It's unexplainable," said ARD expert commentator Peter Urban on Sunday after Cascada singer Natalie Horler was 21st even though German media had touted her as a favourite. More than 8 million Germans watched, a 44% market share.

"Is it that people just don't like us?" Urban was asked on ZDF TV. "There's some truth to that," he said.

"There will be two German soccer teams in the Champions League final next week and maybe people didn't want Germany to win Eurovision too."

Germany won the contest in 2010 at a time when Germans were fretting about the eurozone's future, a fresh round of budget cuts and the cost of the Greek rescue.

>> Read: Eurovision brings German joy amid euro doubts

EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • The German entry was bad and deserved to be lowest in the rankings.

    By :
    Bo
    - Posted on :
    21/05/2013
  • This is ridiculous. It was a dull song (a very typical Eurovision song actually), that's why it didn't get points.

    Stop blaming others and chose a better candidate e.g. like Lena ('Satellite') was a few years back.

    By :
    MihaiP
    - Posted on :
    21/05/2013
  • Eurovision contest what is so important when there are Real items of important to talk about

    By :
    Michael Kadin
    - Posted on :
    21/05/2013
  • Eurovision is a total joke. Everybody knows it. In our house, we predict which countries are going to vote for each other and are correct more than 50% of the time.
    Eurovision is the highlight of the year for some countries.
    In reality, the acts that win rarely achieve anything of note internationally. They are novelties.

    Denmark's winning entry was totally tedious.

    Germany: don't take it personally.

    By :
    Will Atkinson
    - Posted on :
    21/05/2013
  • There may be some truth in this. However, the German song sounded almost exactly like the winning entry last year (except the word 'Euphoria' was replaced with 'Glorious'). It is pretty much like cheating (or at the very least shows a lack of any originality), which is why I didn't vote for Germany.

    By :
    Adam
    - Posted on :
    21/05/2013
  • It's such a silly cliche saying 'they don't like us'. Half of the music charts are by UK artists so the reasoning 'they don't like us' is not true, the reason is as simple as this; the songs that the UK send are atrocious and a waste of TV license money. And why on earth are the UK, France and Germany always guaranteed a place in the final even when consistently sending bad songs? THAT is upsetting to many. Add that France insist on French being spoken. So silly. The UK public don't even have a say in what song they send to the final, it's like a dictatorship, no democracy.

    By :
    Andre Hellstrom
    - Posted on :
    22/05/2013
Emmelie de Forest, from Denmark, is the 2013 Eurovision Song Contest winner (Photo: Sander Hesterman, EBU)
Background: 

When the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) was formed in 1950 by 23 broadcasting organisations from Europe and the Mediterranean, it came up with the idea of an international song contest whereby countries, represented by their respective public broadcasters, would participate in one television show, to be broadcast simultaneously in all nations represented.

The first Eurovision Song Contest – one of the longest running television shows in the world – took place in May 1956 in Switzerland. Only seven countries participated at that time: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Switzerland.

More and more countries joined the contest up to early 1990s when many Central and Eastern European and Balkan states joined at once, followed by further eastward expansion of the contest to include states from the Caucasus in the 21st century.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 3

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

European Project "Open Discovery Space"
thetris - THEmatic Transnational church Route development with the Involvement of local Society

Advertising