EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

Die EU und der Russland-Georgien-Krieg

Veröffentlicht 11. September 2008 - Aktualisiert 29. Januar 2010
Druckoptimierte VersionEinem Freund senden

Die jüngsten Ambitionen Russlands, seine Grenzen auszuweiten, die Nichteinhaltung internationalen Rechts sowie die überaus wichtige Energiefrage seien die geopolitischen Hauptthemen, die durch die „energische“ Machtdemonstration Russlands im Krieg mit Georgien im letzten August aufgekommen seien. Das schreiben Jean-Dominique Guliani und Michel Foucher für die Robert-Schuman-Stiftung. 

The authors are keen to stress that this conflict "directly involves" Europe as the unstable climate puts its "vital interests in balance". With Russia monitoring the Georgian region, the September paper urges the EU "to make contact again with Iran" to provide an alternative to Russia, as Iran is "the only supplier able to make Nabucco profitable". The paper calls on the EU to refrain from "talking of its fears about energy supplies" because it diverts attention away from the interdependence of Russia and the bloc and EU-Russian "common interests". 

Moscow's acknowledgement of South Ossetia and Abkhazia's independence has given it "total control of key routes" including the Black Sea's eastern coastline, states the paper. What Russia intends to do next regarding the Black Sea and Ukraine remains to be seen, but both feature "top of the list" for future action, say the authors. 

Georgia's decision to use force triggered the conflict, and brings into question the viability of the EU offering it membership, argues the paper. Resorting to force contradicts the EU's values, recall the authors. They argue that "precipitating membership", be it Georgia or Ukraine, would "simply draw the EU into one camp or another," claiming that "one does not just join to protect oneself from an enemy or to belong to one camp opposed to another". 

Those in favour of enlargement are unaware of its implications, the authors claim, posing the question: "Who in the European Union would be ready and who might reasonably commit to military action in Central Asia, the Caucasus or on the borders of Russia?" 

The paper argues that the EU "clearly needs to point out the rules of international law to Russia" and increase its presence in the immediate neighbourhood. It says the bloc should provide assistance in regions "where 'frozen conflicts' or potential battles might develop and degenerate after Georgia". 

The authors conclude by recommending that the EU should first protect its own interests and then stabilise its borders before finally promoting "the prosperity of the continent". "As long as the six-point agreement is not totally respected [...] Europe should freeze all ongoing cooperation discusssions" with Russia, they add. 

Advertising