EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

Korruption: schlechte Noten für Bulgarien und Rumänien

Veröffentlicht 28. September 2007 - Aktualisiert 29. Januar 2010
Druckoptimierte VersionEinem Freund senden

Während die europäischen Staaten allgemein zu den am wenigsten korrupten Ländern der Welt zählen, haben die beiden 'jüngsten' EU-Mitgliedstaaten laut Transparency International schlechte Noten bei der Bewertung der Korruption erhalten. Rumänien erscheint hierbei auf gleicher Höhe mit Ghana und Kolumbien.

High levels of corruption persist in Bulgaria and Romania, after their EU accession earlier in 2007, according to Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index published on 27 September. On the index, Bulgaria remains in 64th place, while Romania is 69th in the 180 countries rated, along with Ghana and Colombia. However, the report certifies "significant improvement" for Romania.

Bulgaria scores 4.1 points on a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 10 (not corrupt) along with EU accession candidates Croatia and Turkey, still ahead of Romania (3.7), but shortly behind Poland, which only gets a  4.2 grade. In contrast, Denmark (9.4), Finland (9.4) and Sweden (9.3) rank highest among European countries.

Nevertheless, Transparency International's European Director Miklos Marschall says that, overall, enlargement has had a positive effect on new member states. "EU membership had its benefits through external pressure. That is what you can see in Slovenia, Estonia, but also in relatively corrupt countries like Bulgaria and Romania."

The Commission's reports on justice reform and the fight against corruption published in June had proven that little progress has been made in Bulgaria and Romania since the end of 2006 and concluded that "progress in the judicial treatment of high-level corruption is insufficient" (see EurActiv 27/06/07).

Commission Spokesperson Mark Gray told EurActiv that the EU executive had made no new assessment of the situation since June, but was awaiting action plans from the two governments to be presented in mid-October to address the shortcomings pointed out by the previous reports.

The corruption index is based on the perceptions of experts and business people, instead of hard facts. But Marschall argues: "While perceptions can be influenced by many things, overall they give you a realistic picture."

The Commission is to give a detailed assessment of the two countries' progress in in January 2009.

Advertising