EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

Kommission vor Umstrukturierung der Rating-Agenturen gewarnt

Veröffentlicht 06. April 2011 - Aktualisiert 07. April 2011
DruckversionSend by email

Während umfassende Herabstufungen der Staatsverschuldung verschiedener Länder sowohl Investoren als auch Regierungen beunruhigt haben, warnen diese vor Veränderungen der Art, wie Rating-Agenturen die Bilanzen der Regierungen einstufen, durch die Europäische Kommission.

In a bid to stem the negative effects of downgrades, such as those sweeping the euro zone, the European Commission has proposed sweeping changes to sovereign debt ratings.

But an industry consultation shows little appetite for change. Though most respondents - ranging from banks to regulators and national finance ministries - agree there is a need for greater transparency, they also agree that some measures could serve to make matters much worse.

Currently, financial markets are heavily reliant on an oligopoly of three American-rooted credit rating agencies: Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch Ratings.

These agencies have recently raised eyebrows with some of their recent downgrades of the sovereign debt of eurozone members, spurring EU policymakers to ask questions about the accuracy of the big three's judgements.

The Commission is currently working on a second regulation for credit rating agencies which could ask raters to treat sovereign debt differently to corporate finance and to inform governments three days in advance of a downgrade. The regulation could also task an EU body with taking over the job of grading sovereign debt.

Industry and governments alike appear to agree that credit ratings agencies are the best judge of sovereign debt and that if ratings are off target, then national data and statistics given to the agencies are to blame.

Stellungnahmen: 

Though the consultation asks if banks would not be better off with an additional internal analysis of sovereign debt, banking and insurance groups like ING and AXA caution against putting internal ratings on an equal footing with rating agencies' expertise.

"It should not be assumed that all firms will produce internal ratings that are superior to those from established specialised rating agencies, especially when CRAs are under regulatory pressure to improve their performance," reads a paper by AXA, the French banking and insurance group.

In addition, Dutch bank ING points out that not all institutions have such a large team of specialists as a rating agency to perform a full analysis on each sovereign.

AXA also blames national governments for any inaccuracies in sovereign ratings, saying the quality and transparency of government statistics should also be improved, especially in the European Union.

The European Banking Federation agrees it would not support treating sovereign issuers any differently to corporate debt holders.

A proposal to give countries a three-day early warning prior to a downgrade is also attacked as a way to give agencies and governments time to cut a better deal.

A joint response by the UK Treasury and Financial Services Authority agrees and adds that a more frequent review of sovereign debt – as outlined in the Commission proposal - would put even more "undue weight" on these ratings.

The UK also questions whether other financial institutions currently have the ability to produce "a robust internal assessment of sovereign debt without some reference to CRA ratings".

Unsurprisingly to many observers, a large majority of responses from the public and the private sector completely oppose any European Central Bank or national central banks' involvement in rating sovereign debt, another idea that has been doing the rounds in Brussels policy circles for some time.  

Bruegel, Brussels' biggest policy think-tank, also warns against a heavy regulatory hand as it would ramp up existing barriers to entry and costs, negating the Commission's intention of injecting new blood into the market.

"A lot of this talk sounds like a willingness to shoot the messenger," warned Nicolas Veron from Bruegel.

"We cannot make credit rating agencies liable for the quality of their opinion but we can make them liable for the quality of their process," he continued, advocating greater transparency but less regulation.

Hintergrund : 

Credit rating agencies entered the EU's firing line when agency Standard & Poor's decided to downgrade Greek debt to "junk" status, spreading widespread gloom across EU markets.

Credit rating agencies have been widely blamed for their role in the financial crisis which has been sweeping the world since 2007.

They stand accused of over-evaluating borrowers' capacity to pay back their household loans in the so-called sub-prime crisis. They were also accused of potential conflicts of interest, because they are paid as consultants by the very banks whose debt they rate.

Last year, EU Internal Market Commissioner Michel Barnier said he would formulate a proposal to put credit rating agencies under the thumb of an EU agency, blaming the uncertainty in financial markets on the downgraded ratings of Greek and Portuguese debt.

consultation was launched in November 2010 and the EU executive is expected to formalise a proposal before the end of the year.

Mehr über dieses Thema

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Advertising

Advertising