In a bid to stem the negative effects of downgrades, such as those sweeping the euro zone, the European Commission has proposed sweeping changes to sovereign debt ratings.
But an industry consultation shows little appetite for change. Though most respondents - ranging from banks to regulators and national finance ministries - agree there is a need for greater transparency, they also agree that some measures could serve to make matters much worse.
Currently, financial markets are heavily reliant on an oligopoly of three American-rooted credit rating agencies: Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch Ratings.
These agencies have recently raised eyebrows with some of their recent downgrades of the sovereign debt of eurozone members, spurring EU policymakers to ask questions about the accuracy of the big three's judgements.
The Commission is currently working on a second regulation for credit rating agencies which could ask raters to treat sovereign debt differently to corporate finance and to inform governments three days in advance of a downgrade. The regulation could also task an EU body with taking over the job of grading sovereign debt.
Industry and governments alike appear to agree that credit ratings agencies are the best judge of sovereign debt and that if ratings are off target, then national data and statistics given to the agencies are to blame.




