EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

Was sollte Europa mit Staatsfonds tun?

Veröffentlicht 04. Oktober 2007 - Aktualisiert 23. Dezember 2011
Druckoptimierte VersionEinem Freund senden

Wenn es den Ländern der EU-27 nicht gelänge, eine Einigung zur Handhabung ausländischer Übernahmen zu erzielen, würden die Mitgliedstaaten selbst Maßnahmen durchführen müssen und riskieren, Hindernisse für den freien Kapitalverkehr zu schaffen, sowohl innerhalb als auch außerhalb der EU. Dies erklärte Philip Whyte in einem Papier für das Centre for European Reform.

The author raises the question of EU intervention on the issue of foreign takeovers, at a time when Germany is thinking of preventing sovereign funds from buying local companies in sensitive sectors and the Commission is currently considering how it should respond to such defensive acts. 

Whether it decides to outlaw such action, or establish it at EU level, the EU should ensure that the measures do not threaten the openness of the single market, outlines the author. 

He observes the changes that the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) has been undergoing. The new actors, such as Russia and China, are growing rapidly and their emergence matters because they originate from potential geopolitical rivals. These countries are less likely to play by the West's rules than the traditional major SWF actors - Norway, Singapore, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. 

The shift from private to public actors also raises a number of concerns. It is generally believed that privatised European companies could be bought by foreign governments, notes Whyte. However, even though SWFs would try to buy majority stakes in companies – which is not yet the case – it is not clear that host countries should necessarily prevent them from doing so, he adds. 

State-owned companies, for example, have been allowed to make cross-border takeover in the EU, says the author. 

However, another question arises when SWFs or other state-owned entities seek to buy companies in strategic sectors such as security or energy. The problem is that they may be tempted to buy firms in certain sectors for reasons other than boosting investment returns, the author says. The example of Russia, which used Gazprom as a foreign policy tool, confounded these concerns, he adds. 

According to the author, the German proposal to introduce a vetting procedure for foreign takeovers is not the right answer, as it would take too much time to get the 27 member states to agree on what its mandate should be. Moreover, it could become the target of protectionist lobbying by governments with an excessively broad understanding of what constitutes snational securitys. 

The EU should discuss alternative solutions that ease fears about foreign political control without succumbing to the temptation of protectionism, concludes the author. 

Advertising