EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

Analyse: Wenn Doha stirbt, was dann?

Veröffentlicht 27. Oktober 2006 - Aktualisiert 29. Januar 2010
Druckoptimierte VersionEinem Freund senden

Der Präsident der Afrikanischen Entwicklungsbank, Donald Kaberuka, geht in diesem Artikel in Europe's World auf die möglichen Kosten einer gescheiterten Doha-Entwicklungsrunde für Afrika ein.

Kaberuka begins by asserting that, since World War II, a direct link has been evident between liberal trading regimes and strong economic growth. However, African countries have largely been excluded from this phenomenon, seeing instead their share of world trade falling from around 5% in the 1980s to just under 2% today.

The Doha Round aimed to reverse this trend by mainstreaming development into trade negotiations as well as front-loading the concerns of developing countries. These consisted chiefly of market-access issues in agriculture and special and differential treatment (SDT), including technical assistance and trade-capacity building.

The author states that a successful trade round could contribute some $350 billion to developing countries’ economies by 2015, adding that, if all global trade barriers were eliminated, around 500 million people could be lifted out of poverty by 2020. On the other hand, he emphasises that, in the event of a failed round, the likely increase in bilateral trade deals would on the whole be detrimental to smaller and poorer countries which would find themselves forced to make many more concessions under a regime of bilateralism than they would under the WTO’s multilateralism.

The article concludes by calling for a “renewed and re-invigorated commitment” in order to achieve a successful outcome to Doha. Whereas aid and debt relief can provide a “temporary palliative”, the author believes it is trade and investment that can do most to end global poverty.  

Advertising