EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

Emissionshandelssystem (ETS): EU will Kürzung der Kredite für industrielle Gasprojekte

Veröffentlicht 26. August 2010 - Aktualisiert 31. August 2010
Druckoptimierte VersionEinem Freund senden

Die EU-Klimakommissarin sagte gestern (25. August), dass die Europäische Kommission Vorschläge vorbereitete, um ab 2012 die Benutzung von Emissionsgutschriften durch industrielle Gasprojekte im „Cap-and-Trade“-System einzuschränken.

Under the EU emissions trading scheme (EU ETS), firms can meet a part of their emission reduction obligations by buying international offsets generated under the UN's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) through cheaper emission reductions in developing countries.

But some projects destroying a potent greenhouse gas HFC-23, a bi-product of manufacturing the refrigerant gas HCFC-22, have recently come under fire, as environmental NGOs have alleged that they are playing the system by boosting their production with the sole purpose of cashing in on more credits.

"I have asked my services to prepare a proposal for a measure to introduce further quality restrictions on the use of credits from industrial gas projects in the post-2012 EU ETS," EU Climate Action Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said in a statement.

The announcement comes as the UN last week said it was reviewing requests from five Chinese HFC projects for millions of offset credits (EurActiv 23/08/10).

The EU executive is now preparing an impact assessment, Hedegaard said, inviting input from carbon market participants and others involved to help design the restrictions.

The move responds to demands from carbon trading companies, which have been urging clarity on what credits will be acceptable under the world's biggest carbon-trading scheme after 2012.

The Commission has been using its position as the biggest market for international offsets to push other countries into an agreement on overhauling the CDM as part of a new climate treaty, but Hedegaard now conceded that it is time to "strike the right balance between leverage and clarity".

"The CDM has been successful in some aspects but has also given rise to criticism, e.g. with regard to environmental integrity. As a first step towards a more advanced carbon market, the CDM therefore needs a major overhaul," the commissioner stressed.

The Commission's proposal will be published before the high-level climate conference in Cancún, set to take place between 29 November and 10 December, but it will only be formally adopted next year, a spokeswoman for the EU executive told EurActiv.

The International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) wrote to Hedegaard earlier this week asking for certainty over how the EU will treat international offsets after 2012, when the revised ETS enters into force.

"If  new  regulatory  risks  impact  investments  already  made,  new  investors  will  not  come  in or support new mechanisms. This principle is key to building private sector confidence in any offset mechanism, and to stimulating and incentivising abatement projects," it wrote.

The advocate of carbon-trading companies called on the EU to ensure that if restrictions on the types of project that qualify are introduced, these are not retroactive and are based on objective criteria and stakeholder consultation.

Stellungnahmen: 

The World Bank issued a Q&A dismissing evidence by green NGO CDM Watch that HFC-23 incineration projects are in fact leading to more of the global warming gas being produced to exert more credits from the CDM.

"The analysis conducted by CDM Watch is based on a narrow and simplistic approach drawing from selected parameters extracted from PDD and monitoring reports. Key parameters have been discarded from the analysis, such as operating conditions and technical capacity," the Bank said. "There is not sufficient evidence to support the allegations."

But environmentalists said the World Bank was only trying to justify its investment in HFC-23 projects. They pointed out that the CDM Executive Board of the CDM was still investigating the issue and had suspended issuance credits from six of the projects, including one from the World Bank.

"We find it astonishing that the World Bank concludes there is not sufficient evidence to support our allegations, while the investigation by the Methodology Panel is still ongoing. There is a clear conflict of interest here," said Eva Filzmoser of CDM Watch.

"The World Bank's position is both scientifically and morally indefensible," added Clare Perry, senior campaigner for the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA). "It should stop trying to subvert the CDM investigation and allow the UN to do a job they are far better qualified for than the World Bank."

Hintergrund : 

Under the Kyoto Protocol, industrialised countries can meet part of their climate targets by investing in carbon reduction projects in developing countries.

The arrangement, called the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), operates on the condition that projects generating credits have to ensure "additionality", or the principle that the reductions they achieve would not have occurred without the incentive of foreign finance.

The CDM has attracted criticism, however, as the additionality criterion has been abused. Credits granted for projects that should not have qualified in the first place have allowed developed countries to dodge their climate commitments, critics say.

In January 2009, the European Commission presented a proposal for a global agreement to replace the Kyoto Protocol (EurActiv 26/01/09). The blueprint proposed an overhaul of the CDM to ensure that only projects delivering additional reductions and targeting more costly cuts receive credits.

Mehr über dieses Thema

More in this section

Advertising