EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

EU-Gericht lehnt Arcelor-Anfechtung gegen ETS ab

Veröffentlicht 03. März 2010 - Aktualisiert 04. März 2010
Druckoptimierte VersionEinem Freund senden

Das EU-Gericht fällte gestern (2. März) ein Urteil zu Ungunsten des Stahlunternehmens Arcelor, das die Regeln des EU-Emissionshandelssystems (EU ETS) angefochten hatte. Zudem entschied das Gericht gegen die damit zusammenhängende Schadensersatzklage.

The Court ruled Arcelor's action as inadmissible on the grounds that only companies individually or directly concerned by EU acts can bring a legal challenge to them. It argued that Arcelor is "neither individually nor directly concerned by the directive," which applies generally to all operators that it covers, including those in pig iron or steel production.

The EU directive establishing an emissions trading scheme has since 2005 set an absolute cap on carbon emissions from specified power and industrial sectors (see EurActiv LinksDossier on the 'EU ETS'). It obliges the operators to pay for emission permits for their polluting activities.

Arcelor, the world's largest steel producer since its merger with Mittal in 2006, applied for the annulment of a number of articles under the EU ETS in 2004, arguing that applying these to pig iron or steel production violates several principles under Community law, including the property rights, the freedom to pursue economic activity and the principle of equal treatment.

Arcelor argued that the pig iron and steel producers in the EU face a "unique lock-in situation" as they are the only ETS sector that faces competition from sectors that are not covered by the directive: non-ferrous metals and plastics.

The General Court, previously called the Court of First Instance, also dismissed the steel giant's application for the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to pay for the damages that it has suffered as a result of the contested rules.

The court decision stated that Arcelor had not proved that the law had "committed a sufficiently serious breach" of the EU's legal principles to justify a liability by the Community.

This is the second case that Arcelor has lost against the ETS provisions.

In 2008, the Court of Justice decided that the law did not violate the principle of equal treatment by excluding the chemical and non-ferrous sectors from the first trading phase of the directive. The sectors were added to the scope of the new revised directive for the post-2012 trading period, adopted in 2009.

Advertising

Sponsors

Advertising

Advertising