EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

Ungarns Verfassung als „Trojanisches Pferd für autoritäres System“

Druckversion
Send by email
Veröffentlicht 18. April 2011

Die neue ungarische Verfassung, die heute (18. April) in Budapest verabschiedet werden soll, wird von Bürgerrechtsgruppen heftig kritisiert. Guy Verhofstadt, Chef der Liberalen im Europäischen Parlament, nannte sie ein „Trojanisches Pferd für ein autoritäreres politisches System in Ungarn, das auf der Beibehaltung der Einparteienherrschaft basiert“.

The new constitution "threatens European values," Verhofstadt warned in a joint statement with Amnesty International, the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, the Helsinki Committee and other international and national human rights organisations.

The statement, sent on Friday (15 April), represents the latest criticism from Verhofstadt's liberal ALDE group reagrding the new Hungarian constitution, which according to its critics is the brainchild of the ruling Fidesz-KNDP supermajority in the Hungarian parliament.

At a hearing in the European Parliament last month, MEP Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE; UK) had already challenged the draft constitution on a range of issues.

The Socialist & Democrats group in the European Parliament has remained remarkably silent on the issue. S&D sources told EurActiv that its leader Martin Schulz wanted no controversy with the Parliament's largest group, the European People's Party (EPP), in a bid to secure his appointment as Parliament president in 2012. Fidesz is a member of the EPP.

This time, the ALDE group lists details of the constitution which it says give rise to concern: discrimination which is not expressly prohibited on the grounds of sexual orientation, ethnicity, age and genetic features; the notions of marriage and family which are defined to exclude single-parent families, cohabiting and same-sex couples; and the protection of the life of the foetus from the time of conception, which it says is tantamount to a ban on abortion.

Verhofstadt also voices concern over the prominence that the constitution gives to values such as faith, the community and the nation before the individual, the primary role of traditional families in society and the importance of Christianity in preserving Hungarian nationhood.

The ALDE statement also warns that the new constitution seriously limits the powers of the Constitutional Court, that the administrative autonomy of the judiciary is infringed, and that human rights bodies are abolished and merged.

Counter-statement

The Hungarian MEPs from Fidesz issued a counter-statement, insisting that Verhofstadt's position was "partial, based on false information" and contained "serious misinterpretations". The new constitution does not ban abortion and does not trigger irredentism, Fidesz MEPs insist.

Not without irony, Fidesz says that Verhofstdat should better have a critical look at his own country, Belgium.

Verhosdadt was for many years prime minister of a country where constitutional rights are much narrower than those set out in the new Hungarian constitution, Fidesz MEPs write.

Verhofstadt:: European values are at stake
Hintergrund : 

Hungary's opposition socialist leader, Attila Mesterhazy, has called the new constitution "a Fidesz party constitution," referring to the name of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's party, which is affiliated to the European People's Party.

Only about a quarter of the MPs bothered to participate in the debate on the constitutional draft.

Last week, Orbán said in Brussels the new constitution was "a fine document" and rejected the view that his country could have avoided controversy by pushing the text through after its stint at the EU helm.

A few days ago, Slovakia published an official statement warning that Bratislava would reject "any attempt to interfere with its sovereignty, including the implementation of collective rights of persons identifying as ethnic minorities".

Mehr über dieses Thema

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Central Europe News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Central Europe Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising