EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

Nachhaltige Entwickung: Einleitung

Druckversion
Send by email
Veröffentlicht 20. August 2002, aktualisiert 14. Dezember 2012

Der Begriff der "nachhaltigen Entwicklung" wurde mit dem Brundtland-Bericht von 1987 in die politischen Diskurs aufgenommen. Der am meisten verbreiteten Definition zufolge gewährleistet eine nachhaltige Entwicklung, "dass die Bedürfnisse der heutigen Generation befriedigt werden, ohne die Möglichkeiten künftiger Generationen zur Befriedigung ihrer eigenen Bedürfnisse zu beeinträchtigen." In der EU-Debatte werden drei Dimensionen der nachhaltigen Entwicklung berücksichtigt: umweltbezogene, wirtschaftliche und soziale Nachhaltigkeit.

Auf einer einzigen Seite anzeigen

Debatte

Definition and concept

There are hundreds of definitions of the concept of "Sustainable Development". Since the 1987 Brundtland Report, several attempts at a more accurate and operational definition of sustainable development have only led to more ambiguity. The Washington State University Sustainable Development Sourcebook has an overview of the academic literature dealing with the definition of sustainable development

It is generally accepted that sustainable development deals with three dimensions: the environment, the economy and social equity.

History

The concept of "sustainability" linked to human development originated in the 1970s with books such as Goldsmith's "Blueprint for Survival" (1972) and the Club of Rome's "Limits to Growth" (1972). In the same year 1972, the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, in Stockholm put the spotlight on the reconciliation of environment and economic development.

In 1987, the term sustainable development entered into the political arena with the publication by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) of its report " Our Common Future" [more commonly known as "the Brundtland Report"].

In 1992, the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), or the "Earth Summit", in Rio de Janeiro, agreed on a Declaration setting out 27 principles supporting sustainable development. The Summit also agreed a plan of action, Agenda 21, and recommended that all countries produce national sustainable development strategies. A special UN Commission on Sustainable Development was created. Also in 1992, the EU adopted its Fifth Environmental Action Programme, called "Towards Sustainability".

In 1999, the Amsterdam Treaty enshrined sustainable development as one of the core task of the European Union (Article 2 of the EC Treaty).

In June 2001, the Gothenburg European Council adopted the Commission's Sustainable Development Strategy (for more see our special LinksDossier on the Union's strategy) 

From 26 August to 4 September 2002, the Johannesburg Summit reviewed the progress made on global sustainable development since the Rio Summit (see our LinksDossier on the Johannesburg Summit).

Criticism

Sustainable Development has become something of a "faith" to politicians, economists and environmentalists in the last 10 years. It seems hardly politically correct to dare to question its validity. Nonetheless, criticism has been voiced over the contradictions and implications of the concept.

Some less-developed countries see sustainable development as an ideology imposed by the wealthy industrialised countries to impose stricter conditions and rules on aid to developing countries. Other critics suggest that the concept does not give enough attention to the poor, who suffer most from environmental degradation.

A major critique of the concept has been that is does not question the ideology of economic growth. Some therefore see it as a new ideology of neo-liberalism.

For 'Deep Ecology' critics, the paradigm of sustainable development does not adequately challenge the consumer culture. Deep ecologists argue that the concept of sustainable development is too human-centric.

There are also critics who attack the sustainable development concept from a conservative, free market perspective. They argue that natural resources are abundant and man's ingenuity is so great that sustainable development policies are unnecessary and dangerous. They also maintain that the ideal of intergenerational equity is incoherent and flawed.

Externe Links

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Sustainable Development News videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Sustainable Development Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising