ThemenRubriken
MiniRubriken
Indem sie versuchen ihre Grenzen gegen Terrorbedrohungen, Verbrechen und illegale Einwanderung zu schützen, könnten die in kleinen Gruppen agierenden Mitgliedstaaten die Sicherheit aller in Gefahr bringen. Dies schreiben Thierry Balzacq, Didier Bigo, Sergio Carrera und Elspeth Guild in diesem Artikel des Centre for European Policy Studies.
CEPS Abstract
On 27 May 2005, seven Member States signed the Prüm Convention to step up cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism, cross-border crime and illegal migration. Named after the German city in which it was signed, the Treaty’s main advantage is that it enables the signatories to speed up the exchange of information. However, this paper argues that the Treaty produces negative externalities for the European Union’s area of freedom, security and justice by circumventing the EU framework. First, by keeping the Convention under a multilateral umbrella, the signatories create a hierarchy within the EU. Second, by reverting to an intergovernmental arena, the European Parliament is ignored precisely at a time when it is achieving an increasingly central role in law-making in this field. As a result, Prüm weakens the EU more than it strengthens it, and under many circumstances, it simply cannot provide the way forward to the establishment of a manageable area of freedom, security and justice.
To read the article in full please click here
.