EurActiv Logo
EU-Nachrichten & Politikdebatten
- durch Sprachenvielfalt -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

ALLE SEKTIONEN BROWSEN

Sehr geehrte Leserinnen und Leser!

Auf Grund des großen Erfolgs von EurActiv Deutschland findet die komplette deutschsprachige EU-Berichterstattung des EurActiv-Netzwerkes nun über Euractiv.de statt.

Die deutschsprachige Fassung von EurActiv.com wird nicht mehr aktualisiert, alle bisherigen übersetzten Texte bleiben aber im Archiv für Sie verfügbar.

Wir freuen uns, Sie künftig auf EurActiv.de begrüßen zu dürfen!

Europäische Forschungsgelder werden „unattraktiv“ für die Wissenschaft

Veröffentlicht 05. Februar 2009 - Aktualisiert 29. Januar 2010
DruckversionSend by email

Europäische Mittel die Forschung, laufen Gefahr  „unattraktiv“ für die Wissenschaft zu werden, wenn der Bewerbungsprozess nicht grundlegend überholt wird, warnte die Abgeordnete des Europäischen Parlamentes Dr. Inge Gräßle, aus der Fraktion der Europäischen Volkspartei, in einem Interview mit EurActiv.

She says the administrative burden placed on universities and businesses is making it costly and time-consuming to apply for European grants. 

"German research institutes are now saying they are no longer inclined to apply for European money because it's too expensive and too burdensome. They rely on Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) grants because it's easier to get them," the MEP states. 

Such preference for national funding, says Dr. Gräßle, runs counter to the European Commission's broader goal of fostering greater integration between Europe's researchers by creating a European Research Area (see EurActiv LinksDossier). 

"We are at a crucial point. European research cooperation is so important, so why isn't it quicker, less burdensome and less expensive? We put European research at stake if we can't resolve these questions." 

Research institutes can spend up to €100,000 applying for European grants even though the vast majority of funding requests end in failure. 

"At the moment, the success rate of researchers applying for European funding is around 13%. This means 87% of requests for financing are thrown in the waste paper basket by the Commission." 

The MEP proposes a two-stage procedure for applying for European funds. This would require applicants to send the Commission a more general description of the proposed project initially and, if the Commission finds it interesting, more detailed paperwork would then be submitted. 

Dr. Gräßle says much of the docmentation demanded by the Commission from research institutes that receive funding after projects are completed is stored in an airport hangar. 

"What's the point in demanding all of this paperwork if we don't communicate the results?," she asks. 

Dr Gräßle, German MEP for Baden-Württemberg, is a member of the Parliament's budgets and budgetary control committees, and has raised a series of criticisms of how the EU research budget is administered. However, she is deeply frustrated that improvements she suggested be made after PF6 were not taken on board by the European Commission. 

To read the interview in full, please click here.

Advertising