ThemenRubriken
MiniRubriken
EPIA Business Development Unit Intern – Paid Internship
Interim Public Affairs Manager
Network and CrossLingual Projects Director
Account Executive in Public Affairs - Financial Services Practice
Policy advisor International Affairs
Writer/Web Editor - Native English
Consultant (Scientist) to work on the NERC-funded project "VALOR"
Stellenangebot registrierenDie meisten Vorschläge dafür, wie nach dem irischen „Nein“ zum Lissabon-Vertrag fortgefahren werden kann, würden beachtliche politische Kosten mit sich bringen, obwohl sie rechtlich durchführbar wären. Dies behaupten Daniel Gros und Sebastian Kurpas vom Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) und schlagen stattdessen ihren eigenen Weg aus der Sackgasse vor.
Their June paper addresses the following options, arguing that none of them satisfy political concerns:
To overcome the obstacles in all of the above, Gros and Kurpas propose their own 'Plan B' to resolve the impasse. Member states would "ratify the consolidated treaties as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon". This consolidated text would contain "exactly the same substance" as the Lisbon Treaty. Once all 26 member states have ratified it, it would be submitted to Ireland, which could be presented with protocols or opt-outs on sensitive issues such as tax policy, neutrality and abortion, the authors explain.
The paper concludes that a second Irish referendum could ask the question: "Does Ireland wish to join the EU 26 with the Lisbon Treaty in force?". This would effectively confront the Irish with two alternatives: 'in' or 'out'.