ThemenRubriken
MiniRubriken
Head of Section, responsible for high-performance computing and data handling
Senior Manager, European Electricity Policy
Senior Manager, European Regulation
EU Affairs - Online Media Sales Manager
Senior Media Officer / Head of Press relations Team
Policy advisor Economics and Finance
Consultant (Scientist) - EU FP7 Project 'SafeWind'
Psychiatrist, Public Health Expert or Clinical Psychologist
Energy Engineers and Economists (fixed-term contract)
Stellenangebot registrierenDie meisten Vorschläge dafür, wie nach dem irischen „Nein“ zum Lissabon-Vertrag fortgefahren werden kann, würden beachtliche politische Kosten mit sich bringen, obwohl sie rechtlich durchführbar wären. Dies behaupten Daniel Gros und Sebastian Kurpas vom Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) und schlagen stattdessen ihren eigenen Weg aus der Sackgasse vor.
Their June paper addresses the following options, arguing that none of them satisfy political concerns:
To overcome the obstacles in all of the above, Gros and Kurpas propose their own 'Plan B' to resolve the impasse. Member states would "ratify the consolidated treaties as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon". This consolidated text would contain "exactly the same substance" as the Lisbon Treaty. Once all 26 member states have ratified it, it would be submitted to Ireland, which could be presented with protocols or opt-outs on sensitive issues such as tax policy, neutrality and abortion, the authors explain.
The paper concludes that a second Irish referendum could ask the question: "Does Ireland wish to join the EU 26 with the Lisbon Treaty in force?". This would effectively confront the Irish with two alternatives: 'in' or 'out'.