EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

No 'Brexit' likely when it comes to development aid

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 22 January 2013

Whether or not Britain chooses to turn back the clock on its EU membership, the country is likely to remain an important player in Europe’s overseas development policies.

Prime Minister David Cameron is to lay out his vision of the nation’s future in the EU in a speech on Wednesday (23 January) after months of cross-Channel combat over how to manage Europe’s financial and economic challenges.

But Britain is unlikely to reduce or sever its ties to the Continent on overseas development aid. A divorce could cost Britain international influence, including with many of its former colonies, and leave the EU without one of its most committed proponents for helping poorer nations.

“The scale of the global challenges that we face today - whether it’s climate change [or] food insecurity - I think it would be naïve for any country to think that they can tackle these issues alone,” said Mikaela Gavas, a researcher at the Overseas Development Institute think tank in London. She added that a Britain would “stand to lose on the global reach of the EU” if it were to exit the bloc.

Britain, meanwhile, has had significant influence in shaping EU overseas policy. Under both Conservative and Labour governments, London has played a central role in reshaping aid policies and in pressing other advanced countries to target world poverty.

“A key priority for the UK [was] really about results and accountability and transparency and value for money,” Gavas told EurActiv in a telephone interview. “One of the reasons why that message got so clearly across to all the other European donors - and a number of them are really pushing it forward - is because the UK is a strong member of the club.”

“They wouldn’t have the same leverage if they weren’t a part of it. They wouldn’t have the vote, which is absolutely key,” said Gavas, who has worked for the UK aid agency and the European Parliament.

Tony Blair’s global role

Britain played a central role in development aid during Tony Blair’s decade as prime minister. Blair created a Commission for Africa, enlisting the Irish singer Bob Geldof and African leaders to lobby for a larger donor commitment to the world’s poorest countries. Blair was also prominent in pressing rich nations to commit to fund poverty-fighting under the UN Millennium Development Goals.

Despite Britain’s own banking and economic problems, London has sought to live up to its promises to keep the aid money flowing while other European capitals have cut or slowed aid spending, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development figures show.

Britain spends a higher percentage of its gross national income (0.56%) on aid than Germany (0.40%) and two other former colonial powers in Africa, Belgium (0.53%) and France (0.46%). Britain and Europe’s economic powerhouse Germany provided nearly the same amount of development aid in 2011 - €10.5 billion and €11 billion respectively. France was the EU’s third biggest donor, with €9.9 billion.

But even if British Conservatives and eurosceptics gain the upper hand and downgrade the country’s relationship with Europe, it could continue to participate in donor policy debates, as does non-EU member Switzerland.

Gavas also says London is likely to continue to play a role in the European Development Fund. The fund, which dates to 1959, provides overseas aids and grants and benefits many of the 54 Commonwealth countries, most of which are former British colonies.

A Britain outside of Europe “would stand to lose on the global reach of the EU, [and] the fact is that the EU reaches some very strategic and important countries for the UK which UK aid doesn’t,” Gavas said. These include a number of Commonwealth countries, the Caribbean, North Africa, the Middle East “and other areas that are important to the Foreign Office.”

Next steps: 
  • 23 Jan.: British Prime Minister David Cameron scheduled to deliver speech on Europe in London
Timothy Spence

COMMENTS

  • There are many problems with what is Aid and how it affects the developing countries. Although transparency could be both a hinderance and advancement, one also has to look into the correct supply chain manangement of the Aid itself, and how this is filtered through.

    The many challenges are knowing what Aid is immediate and what is not, for example when the Tsunmai struck in 2004, Aid was cancelled and the first Aid to arrive were Father Christmas Outfits, High heeled Shoes, and Viagra and these sort of things were piling up in warehouses instead of the actual immediate Aid being sent. It took about four years until May 2008 before Aid such as certain medicines, and foods were received and one is still not learning from previous lessons.

    Therefore the challenge is a more 'Supply Chain Management' Approach to Aid maybe using both the Charitable and Public/Private Sectors, also more 'Virtual Aid' of what the countries concerned have to offer, in the sense of the public being able to buy from local shops to enhance the economy of that country (for example: Mr X in Haiti sells soap or blankets link this somehow to the internet and let the public buy from his shop instead of a donation that takes longer to come through then money can filter into the country itself in order for them to be more self sufficient).

    By :
    Rosa Manson
    - Posted on :
    30/01/2013
EU aid helped pay for an eye clinic in Mexico
Background: 

The EU’s main donor nations have committed to providing 0.7% of gross national income to development assistance by 2015. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which compiles aid figures, says four – Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark and the Netherlands - have exceeded the target.

Europe's overseas aid commissioner recently urged rich nations not to renege on their commitments to help the world's poor people, even as EU capitals grapple with their own financing problems.

"A number of member states, for very understandable but for regrettable reasons, have scaled back their ambitions," Andris Piebalgs, the development commissioner, said in a speech on 17 December. "This will make meeting our 0.7% pledge more of a challenge."

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising