Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior associate at Carnegie Europe and editor-in-chief of Strategic Europe. She is also a columnist for the International Herald Tribune. The following commentary was originally published here.
During the 2008 global financial crisis and the early stages of the euro crisis, the French and German leaders often seemed indifferent to the enormity of the problems affecting the global economy. When they met, which was regularly, they paid only lip service to the purpose of the special Franco-German relationship that had been fundamental in making the European Union what it is.
Apart from having completely different personalities - Merkel is methodical and focused, Sarkozy spontaneous and sometimes flighty - they disagreed over many issues, from security and foreign to defence and macroeconomic policies. Analysts often worried that the Franco-German relationship had run its course - to Europe’s detriment.
But over the past year, as it became clear that the euro crisis would not be overcome without Berlin and Paris agreeing to huge rescue operations to salvage Greece and the other debt-ridden eurozone countries, both leaders began to turn to the relationship. They realised that without closer cooperation, the euro could collapse and, by implication, the entire European experiment.
Europe’s path to further integration has always divided these two extraordinarily different, neighbouring countries. No French president has deviated from the Gaullist notion of Europe in which France is the dominant country among EU member states. The powers of the European Commission would be kept in check precisely to avoid weakening the member states. François Hollande, the Socialist party’s candidate, is bound to uphold those views as fervently as Sarkozy.
And despite coming from different political parties, Sarkozy and Hollande share a suspicion of globalisation. Both are reluctant to acknowledge the benefits it has afforded French companies whose reputation on world markets is second to none. Both too use the cover of protectionism to postpone much-needed reforms.
Merkel, in contrast, has been loath to play the protectionist card. German business would not allow it, especially since the German economy depends overwhelmingly on exports for jobs and growth.
If she kept with tradition, Merkel should also be following in the footsteps of her predecessors, especially Helmut Kohl, and making Europe an ever-closer Union. For the sake of European integration, Kohl gave up Germany’s beloved Deutsche Mark in favour of the euro currency. For the sake of European unification, he became a passionate supporter of enlargement. For the sake of Europe’s future, he called last year on Germany to support the rescue package for Greece.
All of Germany’s postwar chancellors were deeply committed to the méthode communautaire for strengthening political and economic integration. A French word, ironically, that means strengthening the European Commission and the European Parliament at the expense of the member states (including their national parliaments).
Merkel, however, shares none of these instincts. In her youth in communist East Germany she had no experience of Europe or of the significance of the Franco-German relationship for nudging Europe towards more integration. She - and this is important for the future Franco-German relationship as much as for Europe - has veered away from the course of her predecessors.
It seems that Merkel, as she lacks that deep, emotional commitment to Europe that Kohl embodied, is not prepared to face down the euroskeptics in her own centre-right coalition. In that sense, Sarkozy must be quietly pleased to have a German chancellor who does not want the powers of the member states diluted. But Merkel may have to rethink her position on Europe.
If anything, say analysts, the euro crisis has shown why Germany, the bloc’s biggest economy, must push for a strong supranational euro-area authority within the EU. “In the absence of trust or a supranational institution, individual countries will negotiate based on narrowly defined national interest, despite the fact that the final result will be worse for everybody,” argues Guntram B. Wolff, an economist at the Bruegel think tank in Brussels.
It is hard to see Merkel or the next president of France quickly making concrete proposals for further steps towards European integration, particularly since Germany is headed to the polls in 2013. But if these two leaders do not grasp the need for a closer-knit Europe, any hope of the Franco-German relationship providing the catalyst for a stronger union will be doomed. And so will Europe.