Policy Sections
Mini Sections
Energy Outlooks produce forecasts for the future global energy situation, especially in terms of energy demand, energy mix and security of supply. This article compares some of the different energy scenarios that various Outlooks provide, with a focus on the estimated impact of climate change policies on the development of the global energy situation and CO2 emissions in the first third of this century.
Energy Outlooks forecast the future global energy situation, especially in terms of energy demand, energy mix and security of supply. A range of organisations issue regular projections that serve a variety of political and economic purposes and with different emphases and different methodologies. This variety means that the Outlooks are difficult to compare. However, by setting clear parameters, it is possible to make a meaningful comparison.
In this introduction, we have chosen to compare three different points of view: the EU Commission's 'European' approach, the International Energy Agency's 'international' approach, and the 'industry' approach represented by Royal Dutch Shell and ExxonMobil. Despite the diverging approaches these studies take, they all make projections with regard to the world energy situation for the next 30-50 years.
This article will compare the various scenarios set out by the Outlooks, focusing on the estimated impact of climate change policies on the development of the global energy situation and CO2 emissions in the first third of this century.
The Commission published its 'World energy, technology and climate policy outlook' (WETO) in 2003. It compares two different scenarios: a Reference Scenario ('business as usual') and a Carbon Abatement Scenario, looking at the impact that climate change policies can have. This assessment aims to help define priorities for the policies that can be put in place to improve the performance towards reducing CO2 emissions.
I. Reference Scenario: assumptions
Reference Scenario: results
II. Carbon Abatement Scenario: assumptions
Aim: to assess the impact of policies aimed at the global reduction of greenhouse gas emissions on the energy sector.
Carbon Abatement Scenario: results
|
Reference Scenario |
Carbon Abatement Case |
Difference |
|
|
Energy demand World (Gtoe) |
17.1 (+1.8 % per year) |
15.2 |
-11% |
|
Energy demand EU (Gtoe) |
2.0 (+0.4 % per year) |
1.7 |
-12 % |
|
Fossil fuels Total World (Gtoe) |
14.9 |
12.4 |
-17% |
|
- Oil (Gtoe) |
5.9 |
5.4 |
-8% |
|
- Coal (Gtoe) |
4.7 |
2.7 |
-42% |
|
- Gas (Gtoe) |
4.3 |
4.3 |
0% |
|
Nuclear (Gtoe) |
0.9 |
1.2 |
+36% |
|
Renewables (Gtoe) |
1.4 |
1.8 |
+35% |
|
Fossil fuels Total EU (Gtoe) |
1.66 |
1.31 |
-24% |
|
- Oil (Gtoe) |
0.73 |
0.64 |
-13% |
|
- Coal (Gtoe) |
0.39 |
0.15 |
-61% |
|
- Gas (Gtoe) |
0.55 |
0.53 |
-3% |
|
Nuclear (Gtoe) |
0.24 |
0.32 |
+35% |
|
Renewables (Gtoe) |
0.12 |
0.19 |
+56% |
|
CO2 Emissions World (GtCO2) |
44.5 |
35.3 |
-21% |
|
CO2 Emissions EU (GtCO2) |
4.7 |
3.5 |
-26% |
Gtoe: Giga tonne oil equivalent (= 42.7 Gigajoule)
Source: European Commission, WETO report
GtCO2: Giga tonne of CO2
The International Perspective
The OECD's International Energy Agency sets out the latest energy projections to 2030 in its report entitled 'World Energy Outlook', published in 2002. Again, a Reference Scenario is compared to an Alternative Policy Scenario. There is a strong focus on concerns about the security of energy supplies, investment in infrastructure, the environmental damage caused by energy production and use and the unequal access of the world's population to modern energy.
Reference Scenario
Alternative Policy Scenario
Both the Commission's and the IEA's Outlooks come to similar findings: new policies and cleaner technologies would achieve energy savings and promote less carbon-intensive fuels. The OECD report predicts that this would eventually stabilise greenhouse gas emissions in the OECD countries by 2030.
The Industry Perspective
The Shell study on 'Energy Needs, Choices and Possibilities - Scenarios to 2050', published in 2001, also devised two different scenarios, which are dependent on societal preferences rather than policy choices. The first scenario, entitled 'Dynamics as Usual', is based on a world where social priorities for clean, secure and ultimately sustainable energy shape the system. In the second scenario ' The Spirit of the Coming Age', superior ways of meeting energy needs are developed to meet consumer preferences regarding mobility, flexibility and convenience.
In both scenarios, Shell predicts an important role for natural gas as a 'bridge fuel' over at least the next two decades. The study also projects a rapid growth for renewable energy, and a potential for renewables to be the eventual primary source of energy.
The Shell scenarios explore "possible paths towards an affordable, sustainable energy system which has found solutions to environmental concerns", but they do not assess the concrete impact of policy measures on the way to this goal. However, the study suggests that for both scenarios, a stabilising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations below 550 ppmv would be clearly visible. There is no reference to CO2 emissions.
ExxonMobil also published a study entitled "The Outlook for Energy - a 2030 view". The key findings of this analysis of the world energy situation up to 2030 are:
To meet higher demand, ExxonMobil maintains that the application of new technology is the best way to meet the energy challenge. This means growing and developing the resource base as well as improving energy efficiency and reducing emissions. Moreover, the company sees increasing opportunities for new coal, nuclear and bio-fuels.