Policy Sections
Mini Sections
Head of Unit - Corporate Services M/F (Grade AD 10)
Permanent representative in Madrid
Principal, Border Management Staff College (P5)
Stagiaire / Trainee - for the leading EU policy media
Junior Scientific and Technical Advisor
Assistant Communications & Public Affairs Departments
Head of Section, responsible for high-performance computing and data handling
Post an EU jobOne of the EU's most compelling political struggles is unfolding in the UK, where the Conservative party is facing an internal battle on whether the party should split from its European Parliament group, the EPP-ED, after June's European elections.
The UK Conservative (Tory) party, though traditionally opposed to closer European political integration, has always harboured a wide spectrum of opinion within its ranks, ranging from those who are actively pro-Europe to those who are vocally Eurosceptic. Indeed, the European question has been one of the most divisive issues in the party's modern history.
The relationship of the Tories to the European Parliament is even more complex. The Tories were the main player in the formation of the conservative European Democratic (ED) group in 1979. Indeed, that group was the third largest in the European Parliament during the early 1980s.
However, when a number of their group partners defected to the larger centre-right European People's Party (EPP), the ED was weakened. As a result, the UK Conservatives joined the EPP's group in 1992, while maintaining the independence of the EPP pan-European party. The Tories' "inside-yet-outside" status was reinforced in 1999, when the EPP group was renamed the EPP-ED.
When current Conservative leader David Cameron was elected in 2005, he pledged to withdraw his party from the EPP-ED coalition completely, eventually reaching a compromise to do so after the 2009 European elections. However, it is believed a majority of Tory MEPs would prefer to remain within the coalition, where they hold a significant number of important positions. Nevertheless, all Tory MEPs have signed a pledge to abide by Cameron's final decision, which will be delivered after the June 2009 vote.
A loveless marriage heading for divorce?
The Tories' relationship to Europe has always been complex, with persistent internal disagreement as to what their position towards, and position within, the EU should be.
The party's affiliation to the EPP, in particular, has been a constant headache for the party leadership. The EPP group is dominated by the Christian right and is generally a strong proponent of European integration, a cause of great consternation to many Tories, who traditionally take a Eurosceptic view. Ideologically, this so-called 'loveless marriage' does not, on the face of it, make a great deal of sense.
As a result, Tory leader David Cameron has pledged to disband the EPP-ED alliance after June's elections, and set up a new group.
If they go: Potential scenarios
Should the Tories leave, a number of options have been mentioned for their post-EPP future in Europe. Cameron's original plan, to form a mainstream ED-style conservative opposition group with Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolánek's ODS party, attracted the attention of Poland's Law and Justice party (PIS) and France's Rally For France party (RPF).
However, as recently as December 2008, Tory MEPs
claimed there was "no evidence to suggest that this new group's architecture is fully formed in terms of firm pledges by other parties to join us in 2009". A new parliamentary group can only be formed if it has MEPs from at least seven EU member states.
A second option would simply see the Conservatives move outside the group structure and join the "non-affiliated" MEPs. This option is anathema to most Tory MEPs, though, as many in the party adhere to the dictum that 'unattached status means no status
'.
A third and quite recent potential scenario is that ED would form a confederation with the Union for Europe of the Nations Group (UEN), a group which Tory MEP Charles Tannock claims that "by and large, identifies with many of the same values as Conservatives".
However, this option would only be possible if, as is currently being suggested in Brussels, Irish Fianna Fail MEPs leave the UEN to join the liberal ALDE group (Fianna Fail and the Tories will not sit in the same group for a number of historical reasons).
'Preferential treatment': Why a majority of Tory MEPs want to stay
Despite the hypothetical benefits of being ideologically unbridled from the EPP after the elections, it is widely understood that most Tory MEPs do not favour such a move, precisely because being a member of the Parliament's largest group gives them a strong platform in Europe, and a disproportionate number of influential positions.
A Conservative source within the Parliament, who did not wish to be named, told EurActiv that "there is no question that a majority of our MEPs would prefer to remain within the group" due the "preferential treatment we are given". "Half of the members are coordinators and we maintain a separate whip on the most important issues."
In other words, Tory MEPs fear that leaving the EPP-ED could potentially diminish their influence and reduce their power in the European Parliament.
UK Labour MEP Richard Corbett told EurActiv that in the EPP, Tories "have far more influence generally – whether that be obtaining good positions or simply being part of one of the big two groups in the Parliament – than they would being isolated on the fringes".
Corbett claims that "the trouble is back home". "Pandering to the eurosceptic wing of his party when trying to be elected leader, Cameron promised to take them out of the EPP- now he’s lumbered with that pledge," he said.
'Cameron is boss, full stop,' says leader of Tory MEPs
Conservative representatives contacted by EurActiv for this article were on the whole very reluctant to speak out, perhaps indicating that the debate remains a highly sensitive internal issue for the party, and one which is far from resolved.
Despite a flurry of online activity analysing the current state of play, most Tory MEPs seem to be genuinely clueless as regards Cameron's final intentions. Charles Tannock MEP, for example, noted that "MEPs are kept very much in the dark about David Cameron's plans".
One Conservative in the Parliament told EurActiv that "apart from the highest echelons of the Conservative party leadership, no-one knows how negotiations are unfolding. Anyone who claims they know is merely speculating".
Speaking to EurActiv in an interview, Timothy Kirkhope MEP, who was elected leader of the Conservative delegation to the European Parliament for the second time in November 2008 and is widely believed to be against leaving the EPP-ED, said: "I do agree that we currently hold some enormously significant positions in the Parliament."
However, Kirkhope would not be drawn on where the high-level Tory negotiations are leading, saying only that he would abide by Cameron's decision: "The leader of my party is the leader of my party, full stop."
Kirkhope denied any rift with Cameron on the issue, claiming “I work quite closely with him” and “we get on very well, actually” though he acknowledged the diversity of opinion among MEPs: “people have opinions, and I’ve got no problem with people having opinions, but at the end of the day, there’s only one leader of the delegation and only one leader of the Conservative party.”
Controversial Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan described the dysfunctional Tory-EPP relationship thus: "In the past, we have suffered electorally – especially at the 2004 European election, when we got our worst share of the vote since 1832 – because we were thought to be dissembling. We fought Eurosceptic campaigns in Britain and then, when elected, we scuttled off and sat with the most integrationist group in the chamber."
Former MEP and current Tory MP Robert Goodwill said: "David Cameron must stick to his pledge to withdraw from the European People's Party and to found a new group opposed to the federalist agenda and committed to an open, free-market Europe."
He went on to note that "leaving the European People's Party will provide Conservatives with more resources, independent control over their finances, and a seat on the front row of the parliament. Conservatives will be better able to protect British interests".
On the opposing side of the argument, former MEP and current Tory MP David Curry claims that if the Tories leave the EPP, it would "damage British interests," adding that "business wants less regulation and better regulation. Does anyone seriously think that we would get this better from leading an unstable fringe group rather than being one of the biggest elements of the biggest group in the Parliament?"
Tory MEP Charles Tannock said: "Personally, I have never been opposed in principle to leaving the EPP-ED, provided we can develop a group that reflects our party's political interests and that enables Conservative MEPs to retain influence in the Parliament."
However, regarding the possibility of Tory MEPs being outside the group structure in the European Parliament completely, he said: "I have trouble understanding how sitting as unattached members would enhance our party's standing - and such a move would reduce our influence to zero. Conservatives would be barred from serving as chairmen or vice-chairmen of committeees, tabling or negotiating resolutions of the parliament, submitting amendments to legislation without collecting 40 signatures or authoring any significant reports."
UK MEP Roger Helmer, who left the EPP to sit as an independent, said: "David Cameron is committed to taking us all out before the next Euro election. Of course Cameron's commitment, on the basis of which he won the party's leadership election, was unconditional. But the tactic of the pro-EPP members has been clever. Yes, they say, we will follow the leader's direction (however reluctantly), but only when we have a new group to go to! Then they have worked hard to undermine any efforts to create a new group. Somehow this conditionality has seeped into the debate, so the new proposition is 'You can't leave the EPP because you can't form a new group'. We need to repeat loud and clear: Cameron's commitment was unconditional. We're leaving the EPP anyway."
Meanwhile, in a statement reflecting EPP concerns regarding the Tories' eventual actions, leading German EPP MEP Elmar Brok told EurActiv that he could "only hope that the British Conservatives will, in their concrete politics, pay attention to European Parliament's power within the legislative process and do not want to weaken the centre-right, because of issues purely internal to their party."