English papers lead campaign to 'ditch the directive'

Published: 08 February 2010
Printer-friendly versionSend to friend

English newspapers today (8 February) took command of a campaign to completely write off a proposed EU regulation which would limit the activity of hedge funds, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), saying it will hurt the London-based financial sector.

Background

On 29 April, the European Commission proposed a new set of rules for hedge funds and private equity firms, requiring mandatory registration and disclosure of their activities to regulators, while at the same time easing their access to European markets in the long term. 

The main regulatory component of the proposed legislation is an obligation for EU-based managers of so-called 'alternative investment funds' to register and disclose their activities, in order to improve supervision and avoid systemic risks. 

The obligations are not applied to the funds themselves, but only to their managers, who are considered responsible for key decisions. However, critics said that the exemption of funds from the proposed new regulation would leave hedge funds and private equity free to develop their investment policies, despite the fact that their risk-prone attitudes were strongly criticised during the financial crisis.

More on this topic

London-based conservative newspaper the Daily Telegraph and its free rival, City AM, launched campaigns against the EU's proposed regulation of alternative invetsment funds.

The Telegraph has coined its campaign 'Ditch the Directive'.

Both newspapers enjoy healthy penetration rates in London's City as they focus on financial news. City AM, founded in 2005, litters London's business districts as it is handed out on the streets and in underground stations.

According to public relations managers, the City is "noticeably more worried" about the pending regulation.

US, UK join lobbying forces

The Bank of England last week reportedly also pitched into the City's row against the AIFMD.

Even the US Treasury has allegedly weighed into the row between hedge funds and the European Union over proposed rule changes, which the Treasury says could damage the £849bn sector.

The US is the prime destination for investments by EU alternative funds, and according to the Telegraph reports, 80% of fund mangers are located in the UK.

In Brussels, the draft law has taken centre stage since its inception, with some MEPs blaming the lobby for putting a "marginal" issue ahead of other pending regulation for new macro and micro-prudential supervisors.

The central bank sponsored the Financial Markets Law Committee (FMLC) to conduct a study on the draft directive, which concluded that "fundamental issues" would create legal uncertainty and systemic failure.

The draft directive, which is more than 100 pages long, would, according to the industry, limit the activity of EU funds with funds outside the bloc.

First published in April 2009, the AIFMD would essentially allow funds managed from outside the EU to sell products to European investors but only if the regulation of those funds was equivalent to that seen in Europe.

MEP for London Syed Kamall, has been leading a Brussels-based campaign against the draft law and has also held regular briefings in the City of London on the law's potential curtailment of the sector.

"We should all be concerned at the way the AIFM directive will undermine investment returns - most of our pensions are invested in hedge funds, private equity and other 'alternatives' that will be affected. We will end up with smaller pension funds and an aging workforce," Kamall told EurActiv.

1,300 amendments to delay process

EU Internal Market Commissioner Charlie McCreevy had been widely credited for pushing the highly contested directive through the EU executive.

However, now the matter lies with the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament.

Early drafts have shown that the two institutions have very different ideas on how stringent the regulations should be.

The Council has been credited for loosening up some of the draft's bolts under the auspices of the preceding Swedish Presidency and the Parliament has been blamed for limiting the funds' activities such that it would hurt growth in the EU.

The European Parliament is currently wrestling with a record total of 1,300 amendments to the proposed directive.

The rapporteur for the AIFMD, MEP Jean Paul Gauzes, submitted a draft report to MEPs on the law in December.

Next Steps

  • 15 March: Jean Paul Gauzes discusses report on AIFMD with Parliament's economic and monetary affairs committee.
  • 12 April: Parliament's economic and monetary affairs committee to vote on AIFMD.
  • July: MEPs to cast their vote on AIFMD.