Policy Sections
Mini Sections
Julia De Clerck-Sachsse, from the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), offers advice on steps the Finnish presidency could take to move Europe forward despite some unclear conclusions from the June European Council.
The European Council has left some central questions concerning the future of the EU Constitution unanswered, according to Ms. De Clerck-Sachsse, a research fellow at the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) in Brussels.
For example, "Will ratification proceed? If yes, how, and what will be done in France and the Netherlands? And if not, then what are possible alternatives?" She points out that their decision to adopt a 'two-track approach', combining debate with clear results, is somewhat weakened by Chancellor Schüssel's comment that "there is no absolute consensus on how we should deliver."
The Finnish presidency thus finds itself without a real mandate in terms of dealing with the Constitution, according to Ms. De Clerck-Sachsse, so the issue will have to be left up to the coming German presidency. In the meantime, she notes that the Finnish presidency has backed off of the idea of the Constitution, instead referring to a 'Europe of projects' in their preliminary agenda. However, she feels continued debate and concrete results by the Finnish presidency could be "a significant step out of the crisis."
Though the Council conclusions contain few concrete initiatives, Ms. De Clerck-Sachsse has some suggestions on ways forward for the next six months.
For Ms. De Clerck-Sachsse, concrete policy initiatives should not completely replace a discussion of the Constitutional treaty.