Policy Sections
Mini Sections
Senior Manager, European Electricity Policy
Senior Manager, European Regulation
EU Affairs - Online Media Sales Manager
Senior Media Officer / Head of Press relations Team
Policy advisor Economics and Finance
Consultant (Scientist) - EU FP7 Project 'SafeWind'
Psychiatrist, Public Health Expert or Clinical Psychologist
Energy Engineers and Economists (fixed-term contract)
Post an EU jobInformation Society Commissioner Viviane Reding faces tough negotiations with member states over the introduction of a European regulator for electronic communications. The proposal is going to be part of the Commission's review of the telecoms regulatory framework, which is due in mid-October.
Almost ten years after the liberalisation of EU telecoms markets, the Commission's DG Information Society finds that "some important problems remain to be solved".
This concerns in particular "a lack of consistency in the way that common rules are applied throughout the enlarged EU", which "makes it difficult to roll out electronic communication services under the same conditions" and results in the internal market being "fragmented into 27 different regulatory systems". The Commission believes that these objectives "cannot be sufficiently achieved by member states alone".
DG Information Society argues that "creating a European Authority working in close co-operation with the national regulatory authorities (NRAs) and the Commission represents an effective means to address the problems". In a draft proposal for a regulation that EurActiv has seen and which is currently in the Commission's inter-service consultation procedure, the DG, led by Luxembourg Commissioner Viviane Reding, advocates "establishing the European Electronic Communications Market Authority".
According to the draft, the authority would be established as an agency based in Brussels. It would replace the European Regulators' Group (ERG) but would be working in close co-operation with national telecoms regulators as well as with the Commission. The new agency would serve three major purposes:
According to the draft, the authority's tasks will be to:
In addition, it will serve as a knowledge pool on telecoms regulation between member states, their NRAs and the Commission, including the publication of an annual report and keeping databases on cross-border issues such as radio-spectrum management and mobile roaming.
ETNO, representing the EU's formerly state-owned telecoms operators, said: "The regulatory framework should keep ensuring consistent regulatory objectives and principles across the European Union, while avoiding a one size-fits-all approach to remedies, given market specificities. Although some new services that are pan-European by nature may call for a more harmonised approach, no permanent additional layer of bureaucracy should be created, in line with the transitory character of the EU regulatory framework."
Ilsa Godlovitch, head of regulatory affairs at ECTA, the association of new-market-entrant telecoms operators, told EurActiv: "Competitive telecoms operators across Europe often find that the wheel is being invented several times over to solve similar problems. Therefore, we have always advocated closer co-operation between regulators, in order to spread best practices. In that respect, it is quite clear how helpful the European Regulators Group's taking a greater role over the past eighteen months has been. We would like to see that role still boosted, and any institutional mechanism to forward that - be it in the form of an agency or in some other form - would be welcome.
"Ideally, we would like to see a solution that involves the Commission and an enhanced body of European Regulators working more closely together. The most important role of such a body should be to provide on-the-ground experience to the Commission and to make sure that decisions take account of national circumstances. There is a danger, however, which needs to be avoided; namely, that you get a lowest common-denominator approach. The structure should serve to harmonise best practices and not the lowest common denominator."