EurActiv Logo
 
4 December 2009
Breaking News:

Commission proposes reform of comitology procedures 

Published: Friday 13 December 2002   

On 11 December, the Commission proposed an overhaul of implementation committee procedures, or comitology, to clarify its executive duties and place the Parliament and Council on the same footing in the oversight of the Commission.

Background:



Most EU regulation in not enacted as legislation by the Council and Parliament but as implementation measures under the executive duties of the Commission. Such regulation can be adopted when the Council has conferred executive powers on the Commission and after an implementation committee, composed of policy experts from the Member States, has given its opinion on or approved the Commission's proposed measures. The committee procedures are commonly referred to as "comitology."

In July 1987, the Council adopted what is known as the 'Comitology Decision,' defining specific committee variants and procedures for the exercise of the implementing powers conferred on the Commission. The 1987 procedures were replaced by a June 1999 Comitology Decision.

The three types of committees - advisory, management and regulatory committees - work according to different procedures and have varying levels of legislative control over the Commission. The type of committee assigned normally depends on the policy area being regulated:

  • advisory committees: issue opinions to the Commission which must take "utmost account of them" in its implementing measures. This procedure is generally used when the measures under consideration are not very sensitive politically;
  • management committees: where the measures adopted by the Commission are not consistent with the committee's opinion (delivered by qualified majority), the Commission must communicate them to the Council which can take a different decision (by qualified majority). This procedure is used in particular for measures relating to the management of the Common Agricultural Policy, fisheries and the main Community programmes;
  • regulatory committees: the Commission can adopt implementing measures only after obtaining the approval of the committee (voting by qualified majority). In the absence of an approval, the proposed measure is referred to the Council which takes a decision by qualified majority. However, if the Council does not take a decision, the Commission can adopt the measure provided that the Council does not object by a qualified majority. This procedure is used for measures relating to protection of the health or safety of persons, animals and plants and for measures amending non-essential provisions of the basic legislative instruments.

In the White Paper on European Governance and again in the December 2002 Communication on Institutional Architecture, the Commission called for reform of the comitology procedures. The Commission argued that the objective of refocusing the institutions as well as increasing efficiency justify reducing, if not eliminating, the use of existing management and regulatory procedures. It also calls for the "rebalancing and strengthening the possibility for Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers," at least in the areas subject to co-decision.

 

Other related news:



In the Report on European Governance published on 11 December, the Commission proposes to amend the 1999 Comitology Decision:



  • revising the existing regulatory procedure, for implementing measures under enabling legislation adopted by co-decision, by introducing two distinct phases: an "executive phase" which is similar to advisory committee procedures; and a "control phase" where, the Commission's draft measures are considered by both the Parliament and Council;
  • complementing the regulatory procedure with an "urgency procedure" allowing the Commission to adopt implementing measures before the legislators' controls take place.
This change in comitology procedures is intended to be transitional in nature, pending a new system of delegation of implementing powers based on the revision of the treaties.

 

Next steps:

 

  • The proposals to modify Council Decision 1999/468/EC are to be considered by the Council and Parliament
  • The Commission al so intends to provide further inputs on reform of the delegation of implementing powers of the treaties under the Convention and the IGC.

 

Links

Advertising
Advertising