EurActiv Logo
 
5 September 2008
Breaking News:

Virtual 'Agora' to bridge gap between citizens and EU[fr][de

Published: Wednesday 7 November 2007   

The European Parliament is setting up an online public space intended to better involve EU citizens in discussions on the future of the EU. The two-day exercise spearheads an initiative to open more communication channels between European institutions and citizens. 

Background:

The White Paper on a European Communication PolicyPdf external , presented by the Commission in February 2006, aimed to tackle citizens' increasing lack of trust in the EU project. The paper complements the 'Plan DPdf external ' response to the institutional crisis caused by the 'No' votes against the draft EU Constitution in France and the Netherlands and the Commission's July 2005 Action Plan to improve communicating EuropePdf external

Due to the fact that it is directly elected, the European Parliament considers itself the EU institution "best qualified to take up the challenge of keeping open the channels of communication with European Union citizens".

More on this topic:

Other related news:

The European Parliament will open a two-day 'Citizens' Agoraexternal ' on 8 November, which uses the internet and social networking technologiesexternal to link citizens with MEPs. On the agenda website, citizens can take part in the drafting of working papers on a number of key questions. From 8-9 November, 500 civil society representatives will discuss these quesitons in the plenary room of the European Parliament in Brussels. 

While future agoras will deal with other issues, this first one will be on the future of Europe: the issue that revealed a high degree of alienation among many EU citizens when the French and the Dutch voted against the EU Constitutional Treaty in 2005. 

Coordinators at the European Parliament have posed a number of questions to which citizens are asked to respond. Overarching questions are: 

  • The European Union is to tackle new topics and new solidarities. How should it address them? (This concerns, for example, Europe's social dimension, climate protection and energy, immigration policy and the question of an integrated European diplomatic service).
  • The European Union is to establish new rights. How are these to be understood? (The Parliament suggests discussing matters such as the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and practical effects of the UK's opt-out from it, and the introduction of a right enabling the general public to petition the Commission).
  • The European Union is to acquire new tools. How should they be used? (Proposed topics include the way that the Commission president and commissioners are nominated, majority voting in the Council and  the Council's transparency).
  • The European Union wishes to enhance its geopolitical role. How should it envisage this new relationship with the rest of the world?
  • The European Union is to agree to an institutional compromise in order to break the deadlock in certain areas. How should the future stages of European integration be envisaged?

Records of the Agora's work will be sent to EU and national institutions and to all organisations involved.

Next steps:

8-9 Nov.: European Parliament Citizens' Agoraexternal on the future of Europe.

8 Nov.: Fondation EurActiv annual conference: 'EU Actors: how to interact with European capitals?'  

Links

Letters To The Editor
Law is not a tool box for politics to indulge in
<a href="http://www.eurac.edu" rel="nofollow">Gabriel N. Toggenburg, EURAC</a>
Not feasible: CEPS Plan B for saving the Lisbon Treaty
Jim Murray, Former Director, BEUC
Advertising
Advertising