Policy Sections
Mini Sections
EU Anti-Fraud Commissioner Siim Kallas has sought to clarify guidelines on preventing potential conflicts of interest which touch on the independence and impartiality of officials working in the EU executive. But the guidelines, seen by EurActiv, have already been criticised as "far too weak" by ALTER-EU, a lobbying transparency group.
The guidelines are based on the conclusions of a working party on ethics in the EU executive, set up by Administration and Anti-Fraud Commissioner Kallas following an 'Ethics Day' in 2006.
They were adopted by the College of Commissioners on Wednesday (5 March) and are set to be published on Kallas's website soon.
The Communication, seen by EurActiv, calls on the EU executive to:
The ethics website would "incorporate and supersede all other existing […] documents or sites" and offer guidance to Commission officials on "all aspects of conflicts of interest which touch on independence and impartiality in the workplace," according to the draft.
"Meeting the highest standards of professional ethics is of paramount importance with respect to the accomplishment of the institution's tasks and its credibility and reputation," stresses the introduction to Kallas's communication. It adds that "this initiative seeks to refresh awareness and provide better guidance on professional ethics in the Commission".
But the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU
) believes "the new Communication on ethics is far too weak". It laments the Commission's failure to come up with "clear policies" and "concrete measures" to address conflicts of interest among public office holders and cases of "revolving doors", whereby former Commission staff leave the EU executive to work as lobbyists.
Moreover, "the Commission is downplaying ethics rules as internal matters, but the issues at stake are of major public concern," claimed Christine Pohl of Friends of the Earth Europe.
Last month, the Commission strongly refuted an ALTER-EU claim that the lobbyists register would be 'useless' without the names of individual lobbyists or 'meaningful' financial disclosure, calling the criticism 'unfair' (see EurActiv 14/02/08).